From: ndame via "Bug reports for GNU Emacs, the Swiss army knife of text editors" <bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org>
To: Drew Adams <drew.adams@oracle.com>
Cc: Michael Heerdegen <michael_heerdegen@web.de>,
"53507@debbugs.gnu.org" <53507@debbugs.gnu.org>,
"larsi@gnus.org" <larsi@gnus.org>,
"46092@debbugs.gnu.org" <46092@debbugs.gnu.org>
Subject: bug#53507: [External] : bug#53507: 27.1; syntax highlight in the eval-expression prompt
Date: Thu, 27 Jan 2022 09:28:31 +0000 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <EKP5z6hfixG4nUjT2SPPouaxCFvIa_2OTo2KoOno8A6uprpH8CYfe9683BWo82fgWzsIab-DIpUxrFE0Wjp3j9fy7oN2tIX2kSGRgXctiRg=@protonmail.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <CO6PR10MB5473E38AD455452F26176AA4F3219@CO6PR10MB5473.namprd10.prod.outlook.com>
> Personally, even when I use `M-:' mainly for a side effect, I'm often > interested in the resulting value as well. The` M-:' dialog could be
> improved in both ways.
I agree that when eval-expression outputs a non-trivial expression
then the output should be formatted properly and maybe it should
be popped to a buffer, because the echo area is not suitable
for examining a complex expression when it disappears with the
next command.
Why don't you open a separate bug about this?
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2022-01-27 9:28 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 18+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2022-01-24 17:23 bug#53507: 27.1; syntax highlight in the eval-expression prompt ndame via Bug reports for GNU Emacs, the Swiss army knife of text editors
2022-01-25 12:52 ` bug#46092: " Lars Ingebrigtsen
2022-01-25 13:17 ` ndame via Bug reports for GNU Emacs, the Swiss army knife of text editors
2022-01-25 13:23 ` bug#46092: " Lars Ingebrigtsen
2022-01-25 13:28 ` ndame via Bug reports for GNU Emacs, the Swiss army knife of text editors
2022-01-26 0:13 ` bug#46092: " Michael Heerdegen
2022-01-26 6:14 ` ndame via Bug reports for GNU Emacs, the Swiss army knife of text editors
2022-01-26 19:53 ` bug#46092: [External] : " Drew Adams
2022-01-26 23:39 ` Michael Heerdegen
2022-01-27 0:06 ` bug#53507: " Drew Adams
2022-01-27 3:08 ` bug#46092: " ndame via Bug reports for GNU Emacs, the Swiss army knife of text editors
2022-01-27 3:19 ` bug#53507: " Drew Adams
2022-01-27 9:28 ` ndame via Bug reports for GNU Emacs, the Swiss army knife of text editors [this message]
2022-01-27 23:44 ` bug#46092: " Drew Adams
2022-01-26 0:16 ` bug#53507: bug#46092: " Michael Heerdegen
2022-01-26 14:41 ` Lars Ingebrigtsen
2022-01-26 16:39 ` bug#53507: " Michael Heerdegen
2022-01-27 15:34 ` Lars Ingebrigtsen
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
List information: https://www.gnu.org/software/emacs/
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to='EKP5z6hfixG4nUjT2SPPouaxCFvIa_2OTo2KoOno8A6uprpH8CYfe9683BWo82fgWzsIab-DIpUxrFE0Wjp3j9fy7oN2tIX2kSGRgXctiRg=@protonmail.com' \
--to=bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org \
--cc=46092@debbugs.gnu.org \
--cc=53507@debbugs.gnu.org \
--cc=drew.adams@oracle.com \
--cc=larsi@gnus.org \
--cc=laszlomail@protonmail.com \
--cc=michael_heerdegen@web.de \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
Code repositories for project(s) associated with this public inbox
https://git.savannah.gnu.org/cgit/emacs.git
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for read-only IMAP folder(s) and NNTP newsgroup(s).