From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Path: news.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: "Drew Adams" Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.bugs Subject: bug#8679: 24.0.50; wrong isearch highlighting for mismatch Date: Mon, 16 May 2011 15:13:16 -0700 Message-ID: References: <066C4D0D5E9344B6AA56A2F57400BE27@us.oracle.com> <874o4u48dg.fsf@mail.jurta.org> NNTP-Posting-Host: lo.gmane.org Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Trace: dough.gmane.org 1305584052 5963 80.91.229.12 (16 May 2011 22:14:12 GMT) X-Complaints-To: usenet@dough.gmane.org NNTP-Posting-Date: Mon, 16 May 2011 22:14:12 +0000 (UTC) Cc: 8679@debbugs.gnu.org To: "'Juri Linkov'" Original-X-From: bug-gnu-emacs-bounces+geb-bug-gnu-emacs=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Tue May 17 00:14:08 2011 Return-path: Envelope-to: geb-bug-gnu-emacs@m.gmane.org Original-Received: from lists.gnu.org ([140.186.70.17]) by lo.gmane.org with esmtp (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1QM63D-000350-Hs for geb-bug-gnu-emacs@m.gmane.org; Tue, 17 May 2011 00:14:07 +0200 Original-Received: from localhost ([::1]:47718 helo=lists.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1QM63D-0000fm-2Q for geb-bug-gnu-emacs@m.gmane.org; Mon, 16 May 2011 18:14:07 -0400 Original-Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([140.186.70.92]:42698) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1QM63A-0000fZ-Nt for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Mon, 16 May 2011 18:14:05 -0400 Original-Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1QM639-0002uK-2k for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Mon, 16 May 2011 18:14:04 -0400 Original-Received: from debbugs.gnu.org ([140.186.70.43]:33862) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1QM639-0002u7-19 for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Mon, 16 May 2011 18:14:03 -0400 Original-Received: from Debian-debbugs by debbugs.gnu.org with local (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1QM638-0002QU-7i; Mon, 16 May 2011 18:14:02 -0400 X-Loop: help-debbugs@gnu.org Resent-From: "Drew Adams" Original-Sender: debbugs-submit-bounces@debbugs.gnu.org Resent-To: owner@debbugs.gnu.org Resent-CC: bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org Resent-Date: Mon, 16 May 2011 22:14:02 +0000 Resent-Message-ID: Resent-Sender: help-debbugs@gnu.org X-GNU-PR-Message: followup 8679 X-GNU-PR-Package: emacs X-GNU-PR-Keywords: Original-Received: via spool by 8679-submit@debbugs.gnu.org id=B8679.13055840089275 (code B ref 8679); Mon, 16 May 2011 22:14:02 +0000 Original-Received: (at 8679) by debbugs.gnu.org; 16 May 2011 22:13:28 +0000 Original-Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1] helo=debbugs.gnu.org) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1QM62Z-0002PY-NW for submit@debbugs.gnu.org; Mon, 16 May 2011 18:13:27 -0400 Original-Received: from rcsinet10.oracle.com ([148.87.113.121]) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1QM62Y-0002PL-21 for 8679@debbugs.gnu.org; Mon, 16 May 2011 18:13:26 -0400 Original-Received: from acsinet22.oracle.com (acsinet22.oracle.com [141.146.126.238]) by rcsinet10.oracle.com (Switch-3.4.2/Switch-3.4.2) with ESMTP id p4GMDI5s009130 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA bits=256 verify=OK); Mon, 16 May 2011 22:13:19 GMT Original-Received: from acsmt358.oracle.com (acsmt358.oracle.com [141.146.40.158]) by acsinet22.oracle.com (8.14.4+Sun/8.14.4) with ESMTP id p4GMDHx6011597 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA bits=256 verify=NO); Mon, 16 May 2011 22:13:17 GMT Original-Received: from abhmt010.oracle.com (abhmt010.oracle.com [141.146.116.19]) by acsmt358.oracle.com (8.12.11.20060308/8.12.11) with ESMTP id p4GMDB7e018296; Mon, 16 May 2011 17:13:11 -0500 Original-Received: from dradamslap1 (/130.35.178.194) by default (Oracle Beehive Gateway v4.0) with ESMTP ; Mon, 16 May 2011 15:13:11 -0700 X-Mailer: Microsoft Office Outlook 11 Thread-Index: AcwUFJDpAfXypSGCTcGYsSboh8CucwAAFwrg X-MimeOLE: Produced By Microsoft MimeOLE V6.00.2900.6090 In-Reply-To: <874o4u48dg.fsf@mail.jurta.org> X-Source-IP: acsinet22.oracle.com [141.146.126.238] X-Auth-Type: Internal IP X-CT-RefId: str=0001.0A090209.4DD1A180.0008:SCFMA922111,ss=1,fgs=0 X-BeenThere: debbugs-submit@debbugs.gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.11 Precedence: list Resent-Date: Mon, 16 May 2011 18:14:02 -0400 X-detected-operating-system: by eggs.gnu.org: GNU/Linux 2.6 (newer, 3) X-Received-From: 140.186.70.43 X-BeenThere: bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org List-Id: "Bug reports for GNU Emacs, the Swiss army knife of text editors" List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: bug-gnu-emacs-bounces+geb-bug-gnu-emacs=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Original-Sender: bug-gnu-emacs-bounces+geb-bug-gnu-emacs=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Xref: news.gmane.org gmane.emacs.bugs:46502 Archived-At: > > Not sure there is an easy fix for this one. And it's not very > > important. But worth logging for future reference, at least. > > Currently it has exactly the same behavior as you asked in > http://thread.gmane.org/gmane.emacs.devel/74539/focus=74614 Not as I _asked_, but as I _stated_ was probably "as good as it gets". To which I added, "but I'm open, if someone has a better idea". I said "I don't know how to fix that." Actually, I forgot about that bug thread. ;-) This time I'm saying something similar, but the use case is different. What I said before is still true, but this report is about the behavior after `M-e', so the consideration about a buffer change doesn't really apply. IOW, both observations are relevant, I think. For this use case (same buffer where `M-e' was used), it might be good if after editing the matching part were not highlighted as a mismatch. Again, dunno whether that would be an easy fix - I doubt it, but maybe you have an idea. I have no good idea about this. Do you?