From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Path: news.gmane.io!.POSTED.blaine.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: Steve Purcell Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.bugs Subject: bug#48180: ruby-mode.el: fix font lock for puts and printf Date: Tue, 4 May 2021 08:31:53 +1200 Message-ID: References: <875yzz24bf.fsf@mail.linkov.net> Mime-Version: 1.0 (Mac OS X Mail 14.0 \(3654.80.0.2.43\)) Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Injection-Info: ciao.gmane.io; posting-host="blaine.gmane.org:116.202.254.214"; logging-data="11387"; mail-complaints-to="usenet@ciao.gmane.io" Cc: 48180@debbugs.gnu.org, Dmitry Gutov To: Juri Linkov Original-X-From: bug-gnu-emacs-bounces+geb-bug-gnu-emacs=m.gmane-mx.org@gnu.org Mon May 03 22:33:19 2021 Return-path: Envelope-to: geb-bug-gnu-emacs@m.gmane-mx.org Original-Received: from lists.gnu.org ([209.51.188.17]) by ciao.gmane.io with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.92) (envelope-from ) id 1ldfFm-0002tZ-NM for geb-bug-gnu-emacs@m.gmane-mx.org; Mon, 03 May 2021 22:33:18 +0200 Original-Received: from localhost ([::1]:32936 helo=lists1p.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1ldfFl-0007G1-Pi for geb-bug-gnu-emacs@m.gmane-mx.org; Mon, 03 May 2021 16:33:17 -0400 Original-Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:470:142:3::10]:60102) by lists.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1ldfFW-00070v-FU for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Mon, 03 May 2021 16:33:02 -0400 Original-Received: from debbugs.gnu.org ([209.51.188.43]:37011) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_128_GCM_SHA256:128) (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1ldfFW-0001J5-6n for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Mon, 03 May 2021 16:33:02 -0400 Original-Received: from Debian-debbugs by debbugs.gnu.org with local (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1ldfFW-0004za-0z for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Mon, 03 May 2021 16:33:02 -0400 X-Loop: help-debbugs@gnu.org Resent-From: Steve Purcell Original-Sender: "Debbugs-submit" Resent-CC: bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org Resent-Date: Mon, 03 May 2021 20:33:01 +0000 Resent-Message-ID: Resent-Sender: help-debbugs@gnu.org X-GNU-PR-Message: followup 48180 X-GNU-PR-Package: emacs X-GNU-PR-Keywords: fixed patch Original-Received: via spool by 48180-submit@debbugs.gnu.org id=B48180.162007392719171 (code B ref 48180); Mon, 03 May 2021 20:33:01 +0000 Original-Received: (at 48180) by debbugs.gnu.org; 3 May 2021 20:32:07 +0000 Original-Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1]:48554 helo=debbugs.gnu.org) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1ldfEd-0004z9-Lk for submit@debbugs.gnu.org; Mon, 03 May 2021 16:32:07 -0400 Original-Received: from mail.purcellpeople.com ([85.214.32.38]:44268) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1ldfEc-0004yk-3L for 48180@debbugs.gnu.org; Mon, 03 May 2021 16:32:06 -0400 Original-Received: from smtpclient.apple (122-57-10-138-adsl.sparkbb.co.nz [122.57.10.138]) by mail.purcellpeople.com (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id 52EEE6726E; Mon, 3 May 2021 22:31:57 +0200 (CEST) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=simple/simple; d=sanityinc.com; s=default; t=1620073919; bh=WkCqtiRrqxc+0x+hU1JQQAjqbkSUKJZ2yKEAp17Vd/Q=; h=Subject:From:In-Reply-To:Date:Cc:References:To:From; b=V3TCWNY3rIZRGCgKwcYv7QRparqCX63Yh0hV/pdpEaXvd4UpgLUQPaSSK0AVDI2Xl BbZJ3i3KT6sCx4sSAUxMXnsKi3BEoT7rUMFFEBiVLLh/LRth5QdwhUdRK3wveDeZ2G Z/n1XNguNRViieZVOTmUqeBLy09sf2L1p4jtvuMQ= In-Reply-To: <875yzz24bf.fsf@mail.linkov.net> X-Mailer: Apple Mail (2.3654.80.0.2.43) X-BeenThere: debbugs-submit@debbugs.gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.18 Precedence: list X-BeenThere: bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org List-Id: "Bug reports for GNU Emacs, the Swiss army knife of text editors" List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: bug-gnu-emacs-bounces+geb-bug-gnu-emacs=m.gmane-mx.org@gnu.org Original-Sender: "bug-gnu-emacs" Xref: news.gmane.io gmane.emacs.bugs:205560 Archived-At: On 4 May 2021, at 04:42, Juri Linkov wrote: >=20 >> Is that important? Like, is anybody likely to call either without = args? >> font-lock is not a precise facility (that anything depends on), so we = can >> afford to be wrong in 0.01% cases. >=20 > It always bothered me that in ruby-mode highlighting was broken for = printing > without arguments, but I had no time to investigate. Now finally this = is fixed. > Maybe some other printing like "p" could be fixed as well, but the > already fixed "puts" and "print" is an improvement. Yes, it=E2=80=99s actually pretty common to just use =E2=80=9Cputs=E2=80=9D= without args to print an empty line.