From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Path: news.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: "Shigeru Fukaya" Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.bugs Subject: bug#1334: 23.0.60; bug of bytecomp arithmetic operations Date: Sat, 15 Nov 2008 13:04:34 +0900 Message-ID: References: <874p29kioa.fsf@cyd.mit.edu> Reply-To: Shigeru Fukaya , 1334@emacsbugs.donarmstrong.com NNTP-Posting-Host: lo.gmane.org Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; format=flowed; charset="iso-8859-1"; reply-type=original Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Trace: ger.gmane.org 1226722226 6570 80.91.229.12 (15 Nov 2008 04:10:26 GMT) X-Complaints-To: usenet@ger.gmane.org NNTP-Posting-Date: Sat, 15 Nov 2008 04:10:26 +0000 (UTC) Cc: 1334@emacsbugs.donarmstrong.com To: "Chong Yidong" Original-X-From: bug-gnu-emacs-bounces+geb-bug-gnu-emacs=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Sat Nov 15 05:11:27 2008 Return-path: Envelope-to: geb-bug-gnu-emacs@m.gmane.org Original-Received: from lists.gnu.org ([199.232.76.165]) by lo.gmane.org with esmtp (Exim 4.50) id 1L1CVL-0001hL-7o for geb-bug-gnu-emacs@m.gmane.org; Sat, 15 Nov 2008 05:11:27 +0100 Original-Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1]:53304 helo=lists.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1L1CUC-0006u0-HL for geb-bug-gnu-emacs@m.gmane.org; Fri, 14 Nov 2008 23:10:16 -0500 Original-Received: from mailman by lists.gnu.org with tmda-scanned (Exim 4.43) id 1L1CU9-0006tl-Jk for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Fri, 14 Nov 2008 23:10:13 -0500 Original-Received: from exim by lists.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.43) id 1L1CU7-0006tZ-44 for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Fri, 14 Nov 2008 23:10:12 -0500 Original-Received: from [199.232.76.173] (port=50539 helo=monty-python.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1L1CU6-0006tW-U4 for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Fri, 14 Nov 2008 23:10:10 -0500 Original-Received: from rzlab.ucr.edu ([138.23.92.77]:48360) by monty-python.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS-1.0:DHE_RSA_AES_256_CBC_SHA1:32) (Exim 4.60) (envelope-from ) id 1L1CU6-0004KO-Cu for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Fri, 14 Nov 2008 23:10:10 -0500 Original-Received: from rzlab.ucr.edu (rzlab.ucr.edu [127.0.0.1]) by rzlab.ucr.edu (8.13.8/8.13.8/Debian-3) with ESMTP id mAF4A8TG021486; Fri, 14 Nov 2008 20:10:08 -0800 Original-Received: (from debbugs@localhost) by rzlab.ucr.edu (8.13.8/8.13.8/Submit) id mAF4A4IR021192; Fri, 14 Nov 2008 20:10:04 -0800 X-Loop: don@donarmstrong.com Resent-From: "Shigeru Fukaya" Resent-To: bug-submit-list@donarmstrong.com Resent-CC: Emacs Bugs Resent-Date: Sat, 15 Nov 2008 04:10:04 +0000 Resent-Message-ID: Resent-Sender: don@donarmstrong.com X-Emacs-PR-Message: report 1334 X-Emacs-PR-Package: emacs X-Emacs-PR-Keywords: Original-Received: via spool by 1334-submit@emacsbugs.donarmstrong.com id=B1334.122672188519107 (code B ref 1334); Sat, 15 Nov 2008 04:10:04 +0000 Original-Received: (at 1334) by emacsbugs.donarmstrong.com; 15 Nov 2008 04:04:45 +0000 Original-Received: from ti-out-0910.google.com (ti-out-0910.google.com [209.85.142.188]) by rzlab.ucr.edu (8.13.8/8.13.8/Debian-3) with ESMTP id mAF44f3A019100 for <1334@emacsbugs.donarmstrong.com>; Fri, 14 Nov 2008 20:04:42 -0800 Original-Received: by ti-out-0910.google.com with SMTP id b6so1081404tic.1 for <1334@emacsbugs.donarmstrong.com>; Fri, 14 Nov 2008 20:04:40 -0800 (PST) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=domainkey-signature:received:received:message-id:from:to:cc :references:in-reply-to:subject:date:mime-version:content-type :content-transfer-encoding:x-priority:x-msmail-priority:x-mailer :x-mimeole; bh=f3+9Ozy3BCphge+XoFJBay2FzwQRm8AjUSTD1sq0Sz4=; b=O9rcw+AVO+KdE+K0Kw1u09T1tNFSUf8WrYlan8/A1/s22b8wLWHPM8jMLYff1IcZhd 4y2+20m6O/GjLLWxGw7AHaJZ1biPh2PgNBLCmOeJDmMOvdDRHSmfGCfrp4Ps+koR8SNc N6LjJpY/kJTjzQfG1yZjD3nR3ZFBYFVujKnQo= DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=message-id:from:to:cc:references:in-reply-to:subject:date :mime-version:content-type:content-transfer-encoding:x-priority :x-msmail-priority:x-mailer:x-mimeole; b=qUaEwD9WGtbiihMvniDtGv5knVe+nzK8te6dCZDS90VoHJvpEPNkwGOf33Ksj0tvhk kePpyy6TyRO5ye7EKCp5Atfh2S2AgkLNiQOn8Ct21WRMr7WXPKmoIf8exBGDbxJFWQrB YCPI43fKJ5S7PL9CYjV6abG1rGE7eXJ4sMVc8= Original-Received: by 10.110.50.19 with SMTP id x19mr1930843tix.53.1226721880033; Fri, 14 Nov 2008 20:04:40 -0800 (PST) Original-Received: from LX1 (122.36.138.58.dy.bbexcite.jp [58.138.36.122]) by mx.google.com with ESMTPS id 2sm2610489tif.0.2008.11.14.20.04.37 (version=SSLv3 cipher=RC4-MD5); Fri, 14 Nov 2008 20:04:38 -0800 (PST) In-Reply-To: <874p29kioa.fsf@cyd.mit.edu> X-Priority: 3 X-MSMail-Priority: Normal X-Mailer: Microsoft Windows Mail 6.0.6000.20661 X-MimeOLE: Produced By Microsoft MimeOLE V6.0.6000.16545 X-detected-operating-system: by monty-python.gnu.org: GNU/Linux 2.6 (newer, 3) Resent-Date: Fri, 14 Nov 2008 23:10:12 -0500 X-BeenThere: bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: "Bug reports for GNU Emacs, the Swiss army knife of text editors" List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Original-Sender: bug-gnu-emacs-bounces+geb-bug-gnu-emacs=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Errors-To: bug-gnu-emacs-bounces+geb-bug-gnu-emacs=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Xref: news.gmane.org gmane.emacs.bugs:22358 Archived-At: Hi, Chong, I agree it's too aggressive. I'd just sought for the best. > Could you separate out the byte-optimize-*-functions part of the patch? They are mutually affected. So I'll make and send a patch of byte-opt.el that includes minimal changes to the latest CVS. It is necessary because the current byte-opt.el still has problems I pointed. It will take a few days. Is it ok? Regards, Shigeru ----- Original Message ----- From: "Chong Yidong" To: "Shigeru Fukaya" Cc: <1334@emacsbugs.donarmstrong.com> Sent: Saturday, November 15, 2008 8:10 AM Subject: Re: 23.0.60; bug of bytecomp arithmetic operations > Hi Shigeru, > > I've been looking through your changes to byte-opt.el. They look good, > but some of the changes are a little too agressive for my tastes, so > close to pretest. > > Could you separate out the byte-optimize-*-functions part of the patch? > A mistake in any of these lists could lead to some hard-to-track errors. > If in doubt, let's simply not perform the optimization for now. We can > apply these changes after the release. ----- Original Message ----- From: "Chong Yidong" To: "Shigeru Fukaya" Cc: <1334@emacsbugs.donarmstrong.com> Sent: Saturday, November 15, 2008 8:10 AM Subject: Re: 23.0.60; bug of bytecomp arithmetic operations > Hi Shigeru, > > I've been looking through your changes to byte-opt.el. They look good, > but some of the changes are a little too agressive for my tastes, so > close to pretest. > > Could you separate out the byte-optimize-*-functions part of the patch? > A mistake in any of these lists could lead to some hard-to-track errors. > If in doubt, let's simply not perform the optimization for now. We can > apply these changes after the release.