From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Path: news.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: Ken Raeburn Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.bugs Subject: bug#11822: 24.1; emacsclient terminal mode captures escape characters as text Date: Mon, 21 Sep 2015 05:23:20 -0400 Message-ID: References: <6eipe9fypj.fsf@just-testing.permabit.com> <415962DC-9BF5-4595-8180-7BE8DB545206@permabit.com> <502427D2.3080003@permabit.com> <83ipcre0fm.fsf@gnu.org> <2AB38709-2307-437E-A242-70B8A358BE4F@permabit.com> <83a9y3dwa8.fsf@gnu.org> <838vdndv9m.fsf@gnu.org> <1341183F-84AB-4257-B28B-57BDE5CA4F20@permabit.com> <83r3m97bzs.fsf@gnu.org> <37C523EE-3D76-40F7-B7B2-99D6F0BD7B97@permabit.com> <83bndc7r5b.fsf@gnu.org> <6ea8swr8ja.fsf@just-testing.permabit.com> <83si6n65ld.fsf@gnu.org> <6e613irc91.fsf@just-testing.permabit.com> <83bnda5lso.fsf@gnu.org> <6ezj0tphtd.fsf@just-testing.permabit.com> <83h9n14e04.fsf@gnu.org> <6esi6kpn4t.fsf@just-testing.permabit.com> <834miv92nm.fsf@gnu.org> <83a8sjreso.fsf@gnu.org> NNTP-Posting-Host: plane.gmane.org Mime-Version: 1.0 (Mac OS X Mail 8.2 \(2104\)) Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable X-Trace: ger.gmane.org 1442827470 22685 80.91.229.3 (21 Sep 2015 09:24:30 GMT) X-Complaints-To: usenet@ger.gmane.org NNTP-Posting-Date: Mon, 21 Sep 2015 09:24:30 +0000 (UTC) Cc: 11822@debbugs.gnu.org To: Eli Zaretskii Original-X-From: bug-gnu-emacs-bounces+geb-bug-gnu-emacs=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Mon Sep 21 11:24:19 2015 Return-path: Envelope-to: geb-bug-gnu-emacs@m.gmane.org Original-Received: from lists.gnu.org ([208.118.235.17]) by plane.gmane.org with esmtp (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1ZdxKX-0007SM-Jm for geb-bug-gnu-emacs@m.gmane.org; Mon, 21 Sep 2015 11:24:13 +0200 Original-Received: from localhost ([::1]:57015 helo=lists.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1ZdxKX-0004rL-2d for geb-bug-gnu-emacs@m.gmane.org; Mon, 21 Sep 2015 05:24:13 -0400 Original-Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:4830:134:3::10]:50078) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1ZdxKR-0004rE-UZ for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Mon, 21 Sep 2015 05:24:08 -0400 Original-Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1ZdxKM-0000Wf-Sj for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Mon, 21 Sep 2015 05:24:07 -0400 Original-Received: from debbugs.gnu.org ([208.118.235.43]:47285) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1ZdxKM-0000Wb-Ot for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Mon, 21 Sep 2015 05:24:02 -0400 Original-Received: from Debian-debbugs by debbugs.gnu.org with local (Exim 4.80) (envelope-from ) id 1ZdxKM-0004Gm-IH for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Mon, 21 Sep 2015 05:24:02 -0400 X-Loop: help-debbugs@gnu.org Resent-From: Ken Raeburn Original-Sender: "Debbugs-submit" Resent-CC: bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org Resent-Date: Mon, 21 Sep 2015 09:24:02 +0000 Resent-Message-ID: Resent-Sender: help-debbugs@gnu.org X-GNU-PR-Message: followup 11822 X-GNU-PR-Package: emacs X-GNU-PR-Keywords: Original-Received: via spool by 11822-submit@debbugs.gnu.org id=B11822.144282740716368 (code B ref 11822); Mon, 21 Sep 2015 09:24:02 +0000 Original-Received: (at 11822) by debbugs.gnu.org; 21 Sep 2015 09:23:27 +0000 Original-Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1]:39495 helo=debbugs.gnu.org) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.80) (envelope-from ) id 1ZdxJn-0004Fv-8v for submit@debbugs.gnu.org; Mon, 21 Sep 2015 05:23:27 -0400 Original-Received: from mail-qk0-f176.google.com ([209.85.220.176]:34824) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.80) (envelope-from ) id 1ZdxJl-0004Fm-1U for 11822@debbugs.gnu.org; Mon, 21 Sep 2015 05:23:25 -0400 Original-Received: by qkap81 with SMTP id p81so42174383qka.2 for <11822@debbugs.gnu.org>; Mon, 21 Sep 2015 02:23:24 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=permabit.com; s=google; h=subject:mime-version:content-type:from:in-reply-to:date:cc :content-transfer-encoding:message-id:references:to; bh=nTUDT6GGKEQbPSCZDhYQ+Sie4/fzdvXsMwgHG/qY+7M=; b=jzhleq3uVOVj+RfkNBpkrWBoHOVgsWZNKcDiZMAjQqyCTVwOb5aHIazf/zaLUatwj4 3/qLxpBPbNqEjwlTsZA8up6FjPXTtGMRSHP/CiQ6bZdSxQLkxll5SkyB4Ig4EZoQ1/7r y6r0ABp+gHq02H3EL9Zz4RX4/1NHkLGThmaNc= X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20130820; h=x-gm-message-state:subject:mime-version:content-type:from :in-reply-to:date:cc:content-transfer-encoding:message-id:references :to; bh=nTUDT6GGKEQbPSCZDhYQ+Sie4/fzdvXsMwgHG/qY+7M=; b=HXUq4Q/8TQfPCBF4XX7MXKl6/NI8f5IaF517wD5UWEv54kwR/IAS729PQkima4WesS 2lRBUU+JZMIbal00lI0bqAoUqVt5zleWI+xDQnI6UCzB5wE96ZP+uGFReagsDMzH0DR4 w6AApslz0pHiAETleP6mroP3fd7l4r/GZ8/WpYKW0lSzqhDWJgo0uqTdpiRJqhy5TJ6l xYedSEx1Btj2iTTZ8RgwJohknMYfJhiYrm+9wSLuyzeM2DWVdMXqVjjbjEnlIku8s1Vt 5WFjpXh/bl/vlGDOuXbBJcX9iYXZhRg1lVveU6cEfq69YwEKUCE2WzOEuRn4Ymo/5a7T Ndow== X-Gm-Message-State: ALoCoQljhzmLsf1m3PfkydrewVIC9KB5BrnbHXMum6uPp0+h8VfpJrcL37DW8NrCrFDBG42z/fon X-Received: by 10.55.214.70 with SMTP id t67mr20557981qki.61.1442827404383; Mon, 21 Sep 2015 02:23:24 -0700 (PDT) Original-Received: from [192.168.17.111] (c-66-31-203-101.hsd1.ma.comcast.net. [66.31.203.101]) by smtp.gmail.com with ESMTPSA id 203sm5439273qht.21.2015.09.21.02.23.22 (version=TLSv1 cipher=ECDHE-RSA-RC4-SHA bits=128/128); Mon, 21 Sep 2015 02:23:23 -0700 (PDT) In-Reply-To: <83a8sjreso.fsf@gnu.org> X-Mailer: Apple Mail (2.2104) X-BeenThere: debbugs-submit@debbugs.gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.15 Precedence: list X-detected-operating-system: by eggs.gnu.org: GNU/Linux 3.x X-Received-From: 208.118.235.43 X-BeenThere: bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org List-Id: "Bug reports for GNU Emacs, the Swiss army knife of text editors" List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: bug-gnu-emacs-bounces+geb-bug-gnu-emacs=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Original-Sender: bug-gnu-emacs-bounces+geb-bug-gnu-emacs=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Xref: news.gmane.org gmane.emacs.bugs:106764 Archived-At: > On Sep 18, 2015, at 10:19, Eli Zaretskii wrote: >=20 >=20 > I've pushed a scratch/face-realization branch to Savannah. Ken, can > you try that and see if there are any tangible gains (or bugs) in your > configuration? I'm particularly interested to know whether this > eliminates unnecessary calls to realize faces on frames that are on > another display. If you see such calls, please show backtraces. >=20 > Thanks. Sorry it took a little while, but I got a chance this weekend to try it = out. It worked great! According to my _XReply breakpoint, there were only = four times it stopped to wait for data from the first X server (2x = XGetSelectionOwner, 2x XQueryColors), and no hits on face realization = breakpoints for the first display. No obvious bugs with it, but I=E2=80=99= ll try to test it out a bit more at work this week. Ken=