From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Path: news.gmane.io!.POSTED.blaine.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: Richard Stallman Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.bugs Subject: bug#24902: Antw: [EXT] Re: bug#24902: 25.1; C-x = for Unicode Date: Tue, 01 Feb 2022 00:06:55 -0500 Message-ID: References: <877dap3uea.fsf@gnus.org> <4CEFB383-E7C8-4AA8-9B43-6267E5523DC3@acm.org> <87lez2tzfz.fsf@gnus.org> <87lez2tzfz.fsf@gnus.org> <87a6fihaku.fsf@gmail.com> <469D64F5020000015C413831@gwsmtp.uni-regensburg.de> <0106AEA10200006A824A10E1@gwsmtp.uni-regensburg.de> <61F1561A020000A1000472CB@gwsmtp.uni-regensburg.de> <87v8y5mblo.fsf@gnus.org> <867dal9k8g.fsf@mail.linkov.net> <83ee4sc4f0.fsf@gnu.org> <87o83ud30u.fsf@gnus.org> <83leyybnee.fsf@gnu.org> <87a6fdcjiy.fsf@gnus.org> <83mtjd9nnk.fsf@gnu.org> <87bkzs2aez.fsf@gnus.org> Reply-To: rms@gnu.org Content-Type: text/plain; charset=Utf-8 Injection-Info: ciao.gmane.io; posting-host="blaine.gmane.org:116.202.254.214"; logging-data="20666"; mail-complaints-to="usenet@ciao.gmane.io" Cc: mattiase@acm.org, rpluim@gmail.com, Ulrich.Windl@rz.uni-regensburg.de, juri@linkov.net, 24902@debbugs.gnu.org To: Lars Ingebrigtsen Original-X-From: bug-gnu-emacs-bounces+geb-bug-gnu-emacs=m.gmane-mx.org@gnu.org Tue Feb 01 06:08:28 2022 Return-path: Envelope-to: geb-bug-gnu-emacs@m.gmane-mx.org Original-Received: from lists.gnu.org ([209.51.188.17]) by ciao.gmane.io with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.92) (envelope-from ) id 1nElP1-0005F5-L6 for geb-bug-gnu-emacs@m.gmane-mx.org; Tue, 01 Feb 2022 06:08:27 +0100 Original-Received: from localhost ([::1]:50668 helo=lists1p.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1nElP0-0006qp-Ky for geb-bug-gnu-emacs@m.gmane-mx.org; Tue, 01 Feb 2022 00:08:26 -0500 Original-Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([209.51.188.92]:53876) by lists.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1nElOc-0006oI-Kg for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Tue, 01 Feb 2022 00:08:05 -0500 Original-Received: from debbugs.gnu.org ([209.51.188.43]:48582) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_128_GCM_SHA256:128) (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1nElOc-0004Im-AA for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Tue, 01 Feb 2022 00:08:02 -0500 Original-Received: from Debian-debbugs by debbugs.gnu.org with local (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1nElOc-0004nN-3l for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Tue, 01 Feb 2022 00:08:02 -0500 X-Loop: help-debbugs@gnu.org Resent-From: Richard Stallman Original-Sender: "Debbugs-submit" Resent-CC: bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org Resent-Date: Tue, 01 Feb 2022 05:08:02 +0000 Resent-Message-ID: Resent-Sender: help-debbugs@gnu.org X-GNU-PR-Message: followup 24902 X-GNU-PR-Package: emacs X-GNU-PR-Keywords: wontfix Original-Received: via spool by 24902-submit@debbugs.gnu.org id=B24902.164369202718359 (code B ref 24902); Tue, 01 Feb 2022 05:08:02 +0000 Original-Received: (at 24902) by debbugs.gnu.org; 1 Feb 2022 05:07:07 +0000 Original-Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1]:41485 helo=debbugs.gnu.org) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1nElNi-0004m3-M5 for submit@debbugs.gnu.org; Tue, 01 Feb 2022 00:07:06 -0500 Original-Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([209.51.188.92]:46872) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1nElNh-0004la-9A for 24902@debbugs.gnu.org; Tue, 01 Feb 2022 00:07:05 -0500 Original-Received: from [2001:470:142:3::e] (port=35388 helo=fencepost.gnu.org) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1nElNa-00046N-6I; Tue, 01 Feb 2022 00:06:58 -0500 DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; q=dns/txt; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gnu.org; s=fencepost-gnu-org; h=Date:References:Subject:In-Reply-To:To:From: mime-version; bh=3skVThn2nP2fHmVcVn6wIKaM5zugsf8AyDvL6EypLoE=; b=Cfsw6wsDOMtY C1NEzgzKET4Fxboa13jCtbOTboza5L4c1exTxYq/Rq1VVKqGx/fMi+L2qZguw9QhsGy3mtaFqsi0i DXUSKRCWrxH0mmgnlCQVUR0qIS4OEdWvBug/ONgbA2uewdxGD60MKUcslG3nJ5/J0DOoIVJA4Kqsw GYZ0/BXVuR6GDULQiOx40FywxjkqVreye5XgAZkF0JHdk2fGHzISCB6q/xz9LM2eY9MXwpggWCKai 17qnuT9t2bcirRr7Tc0ZGQ8g/y0Cr33fLq2ehbTYDku0o47Z5P2c5Sj6vR4WdKFT4B251UzgfyCrY xOuv7KEenh444+YAPukCEA==; Original-Received: from rms by fencepost.gnu.org with local (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1nElNX-0004SI-0D; Tue, 01 Feb 2022 00:06:56 -0500 In-Reply-To: <87bkzs2aez.fsf@gnus.org> (message from Lars Ingebrigtsen on Mon, 31 Jan 2022 16:27:00 +0100) X-BeenThere: debbugs-submit@debbugs.gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.18 Precedence: list X-BeenThere: bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org List-Id: "Bug reports for GNU Emacs, the Swiss army knife of text editors" List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: bug-gnu-emacs-bounces+geb-bug-gnu-emacs=m.gmane-mx.org@gnu.org Original-Sender: "bug-gnu-emacs" Xref: news.gmane.io gmane.emacs.bugs:225738 Archived-At: [[[ To any NSA and FBI agents reading my email: please consider ]]] [[[ whether defending the US Constitution against all enemies, ]]] [[[ foreign or domestic, requires you to follow Snowden's example. ]]] If "splitting" C-x = means what I think it means, it implies using two key sequences instead of one. That would be a significant cost. Would this change offer any practical benefit? > They are different commands with evidently different goals, so > making them new commands sounds appropriate to me. That is an improvement in conceptual neatness, but I don't think it is worth the practical price of two keys where one key now serves. > The intent is to have something that's useful for a larger portion of > the users on `C-x ='? That could be an improvement, depending. What, concretely, would that command do? -- Dr Richard Stallman (https://stallman.org) Chief GNUisance of the GNU Project (https://gnu.org) Founder, Free Software Foundation (https://fsf.org) Internet Hall-of-Famer (https://internethalloffame.org)