From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Path: news.gmane.io!.POSTED.blaine.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: Richard Stallman Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.bugs Subject: bug#44834: Fix for failing indentation of Tcl procs nested in namespace Date: Thu, 11 Feb 2021 08:39:12 -0500 Message-ID: References: <87sg8zk4lj.fsf@precedence.co.uk> <87k0rzatbp.fsf@gnus.org> <87h7mo85t6.fsf@gnus.org> <8735y7nk9z.fsf@gnus.org> <87h7mlk5re.fsf@gnus.org> <8335y5l059.fsf@gnu.org> <837dngj6yp.fsf@gnu.org> Reply-To: rms@gnu.org Content-Type: text/plain; charset=Utf-8 Injection-Info: ciao.gmane.io; posting-host="blaine.gmane.org:116.202.254.214"; logging-data="40818"; mail-complaints-to="usenet@ciao.gmane.io" Cc: anticrisisg@gmail.com, larsi@gnus.org, 44834@debbugs.gnu.org, dgutov@yandex.ru To: Eli Zaretskii Original-X-From: bug-gnu-emacs-bounces+geb-bug-gnu-emacs=m.gmane-mx.org@gnu.org Thu Feb 11 14:59:32 2021 Return-path: Envelope-to: geb-bug-gnu-emacs@m.gmane-mx.org Original-Received: from lists.gnu.org ([209.51.188.17]) by ciao.gmane.io with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.92) (envelope-from ) id 1lACVI-000AUY-3c for geb-bug-gnu-emacs@m.gmane-mx.org; Thu, 11 Feb 2021 14:59:32 +0100 Original-Received: from localhost ([::1]:38794 helo=lists1p.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1lACVH-0006UM-5A for geb-bug-gnu-emacs@m.gmane-mx.org; Thu, 11 Feb 2021 08:59:31 -0500 Original-Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:470:142:3::10]:43522) by lists.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1lACCQ-00071Q-Fu for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Thu, 11 Feb 2021 08:40:02 -0500 Original-Received: from debbugs.gnu.org ([209.51.188.43]:46461) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_128_GCM_SHA256:128) (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1lACCQ-0007hq-6L for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Thu, 11 Feb 2021 08:40:02 -0500 Original-Received: from Debian-debbugs by debbugs.gnu.org with local (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1lACCQ-00062X-4K for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Thu, 11 Feb 2021 08:40:02 -0500 X-Loop: help-debbugs@gnu.org Resent-From: Richard Stallman Original-Sender: "Debbugs-submit" Resent-CC: bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org Resent-Date: Thu, 11 Feb 2021 13:40:02 +0000 Resent-Message-ID: Resent-Sender: help-debbugs@gnu.org X-GNU-PR-Message: followup 44834 X-GNU-PR-Package: emacs X-GNU-PR-Keywords: patch fixed Original-Received: via spool by 44834-submit@debbugs.gnu.org id=B44834.161305076123152 (code B ref 44834); Thu, 11 Feb 2021 13:40:02 +0000 Original-Received: (at 44834) by debbugs.gnu.org; 11 Feb 2021 13:39:21 +0000 Original-Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1]:58004 helo=debbugs.gnu.org) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1lACBk-00061M-VY for submit@debbugs.gnu.org; Thu, 11 Feb 2021 08:39:21 -0500 Original-Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([209.51.188.92]:53558) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1lACBi-00061A-SY for 44834@debbugs.gnu.org; Thu, 11 Feb 2021 08:39:19 -0500 Original-Received: from fencepost.gnu.org ([2001:470:142:3::e]:41224) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1lACBd-0007NZ-H2; Thu, 11 Feb 2021 08:39:13 -0500 Original-Received: from rms by fencepost.gnu.org with local (Exim 4.82) (envelope-from ) id 1lACBc-0000eU-C1; Thu, 11 Feb 2021 08:39:12 -0500 In-Reply-To: <837dngj6yp.fsf@gnu.org> (message from Eli Zaretskii on Wed, 10 Feb 2021 17:08:46 +0200) X-BeenThere: debbugs-submit@debbugs.gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.18 Precedence: list X-BeenThere: bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org List-Id: "Bug reports for GNU Emacs, the Swiss army knife of text editors" List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: bug-gnu-emacs-bounces+geb-bug-gnu-emacs=m.gmane-mx.org@gnu.org Original-Sender: "bug-gnu-emacs" Xref: news.gmane.io gmane.emacs.bugs:199808 Archived-At: [[[ To any NSA and FBI agents reading my email: please consider ]]] [[[ whether defending the US Constitution against all enemies, ]]] [[[ foreign or domestic, requires you to follow Snowden's example. ]]] > Why remove the note about not counting deleted lines? Because it is logically not necessary. > I agree that in > principle "new or modified" covers that, but how many readers will > immediately understand that "modified" doesn't include "deleted"? The idea is to count lines in the new version which are added or modified. If that is clear, you will see that it doesn't count anything from the old versin. If that is not clear, we do need to clarify it. But real clarification calls for more than "deleted lines don't count". It's, "Don't count _anything_ from the old code; count only the added and modified lines in the _patched_ code." -- Dr Richard Stallman Chief GNUisance of the GNU Project (https://gnu.org) Founder, Free Software Foundation (https://fsf.org) Internet Hall-of-Famer (https://internethalloffame.org)