From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Path: news.gmane.io!.POSTED.blaine.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: Francesco =?UTF-8?Q?Potort=C3=AC?= Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.bugs Subject: bug#43866: 26.3; italian postfix additions Date: Thu, 08 Oct 2020 15:26:07 +0200 Message-ID: References: <83tuv47vkn.fsf@gnu.org> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit Injection-Info: ciao.gmane.io; posting-host="blaine.gmane.org:116.202.254.214"; logging-data="22646"; mail-complaints-to="usenet@ciao.gmane.io" Cc: 43866@debbugs.gnu.org To: Robert Pluim Original-X-From: bug-gnu-emacs-bounces+geb-bug-gnu-emacs=m.gmane-mx.org@gnu.org Thu Oct 08 15:27:12 2020 Return-path: Envelope-to: geb-bug-gnu-emacs@m.gmane-mx.org Original-Received: from lists.gnu.org ([209.51.188.17]) by ciao.gmane.io with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.92) (envelope-from ) id 1kQVwr-0005kg-JJ for geb-bug-gnu-emacs@m.gmane-mx.org; Thu, 08 Oct 2020 15:27:09 +0200 Original-Received: from localhost ([::1]:34208 helo=lists1p.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1kQVwq-0000SE-Dl for geb-bug-gnu-emacs@m.gmane-mx.org; Thu, 08 Oct 2020 09:27:08 -0400 Original-Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:470:142:3::10]:53390) by lists.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1kQVwk-0000Rv-OF for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Thu, 08 Oct 2020 09:27:02 -0400 Original-Received: from debbugs.gnu.org ([209.51.188.43]:47532) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_128_GCM_SHA256:128) (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1kQVwk-0006FO-F7 for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Thu, 08 Oct 2020 09:27:02 -0400 Original-Received: from Debian-debbugs by debbugs.gnu.org with local (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1kQVwk-0005M6-BL for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Thu, 08 Oct 2020 09:27:02 -0400 X-Loop: help-debbugs@gnu.org Resent-From: Francesco =?UTF-8?Q?Potort=C3=AC?= Original-Sender: "Debbugs-submit" Resent-CC: bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org Resent-Date: Thu, 08 Oct 2020 13:27:02 +0000 Resent-Message-ID: Resent-Sender: help-debbugs@gnu.org X-GNU-PR-Message: followup 43866 X-GNU-PR-Package: emacs Original-Received: via spool by 43866-submit@debbugs.gnu.org id=B43866.160216357320531 (code B ref 43866); Thu, 08 Oct 2020 13:27:02 +0000 Original-Received: (at 43866) by debbugs.gnu.org; 8 Oct 2020 13:26:13 +0000 Original-Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1]:59077 helo=debbugs.gnu.org) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1kQVvw-0005L4-PL for submit@debbugs.gnu.org; Thu, 08 Oct 2020 09:26:13 -0400 Original-Received: from smtp-clients2.isti.cnr.it ([146.48.28.37]:46458) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1kQVvt-0005Kv-G4 for 43866@debbugs.gnu.org; Thu, 08 Oct 2020 09:26:10 -0400 Original-Received: from tucano.isti.cnr.it (tucano.isti.cnr.it [146.48.81.102]) (Authenticated sender: pot) by smtp-clients2.isti.cnr.it (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id 034E2B0833; Thu, 8 Oct 2020 15:26:08 +0200 (CEST) X-Virus-Status: Clean X-Virus-Scanned: clamav-milter 0.102.4 at smtp-out.isti.cnr.it Original-Received: from pot by tucano.isti.cnr.it with local (Exim 4.94) (envelope-from ) id 1kQVvr-005yX3-LW; Thu, 08 Oct 2020 15:26:07 +0200 In-reply-to: (rpluim@gmail.com) X-fingerprint: 4B02 6187 5C03 D6B1 2E31 7666 09DF 2DC9 BE21 6115 X-BeenThere: debbugs-submit@debbugs.gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.18 Precedence: list X-BeenThere: bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org List-Id: "Bug reports for GNU Emacs, the Swiss army knife of text editors" List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: bug-gnu-emacs-bounces+geb-bug-gnu-emacs=m.gmane-mx.org@gnu.org Original-Sender: "bug-gnu-emacs" Xref: news.gmane.io gmane.emacs.bugs:190094 Archived-At: > >> The rationale is that in Italy latin-9 should be used insterad of > >> latin1, which does not contain the euro symbol. And that > >> italian-postfix should allow introducing the euro symbol. > > Eli> As for the Euro symbol, I guess we need to add it to all the Latin > Eli> input methods, not just the Italian one? > >Itʼs already in latin-postfix and on C-x 8 * E, is that really >necessary? I don't use latin-postfix, because it gets in the way: there are many more combinations than in italian postifix which change what I am writing - this is an added burden for a minuscul added benefit. This is why italian-postifix exists, in spite of the existence of latin-postfix. I don't use C-x 8 either, because I'd have to learn a lot of complex bindings: when I need some exotic char I use the terminal or the X combinations, which are easier and not specific to Emacs, unless I am forced to. This has little to do with italian-postfix, in fact. All in all, I don't get your objection. What would be the drawback of adding the E = keybinding?