From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Path: news.gmane.org!.POSTED.blaine.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: Richard Stallman Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.bugs Subject: bug#34639: 26.1; Custom themes break terminal when switching to org-mode Date: Sat, 02 Mar 2019 22:01:34 -0500 Message-ID: References: <877edpnks4.fsf@sakura.i-did-not-set--mail-host-address--so-tickle-me> <83lg25nizp.fsf@gnu.org> <874l8t10t3.fsf@sakura.i-did-not-set--mail-host-address--so-tickle-me> <83a7ilngql.fsf@gnu.org> <871s3x0zfz.fsf@sakura.i-did-not-set--mail-host-address--so-tickle-me> <835zt9ng24.fsf@gnu.org> <87tvgtget3.fsf@sakura.i-did-not-set--mail-host-address--so-tickle-me> <834l8tnf4b.fsf@gnu.org> <87o971hskf.fsf@sakura.i-did-not-set--mail-host-address--so-tickle-me> <8336odnen2.fsf@gnu.org> <87va19dkaw.fsf@sakura.i-did-not-set--mail-host-address--so-tickle-me> <831s3wo87r.fsf@gnu.org> <871s3vofu9.fsf@sakura.i-did-not-set--mail-host-address--so-tickle-me> <87imx71vuc.fsf@tcd.ie> <83h8crmdan.fsf@gnu.org> <83a7ihkx77.fsf@gnu.org> <83mumfkee9.fsf@gnu.org> <83r2bphidl.fsf@gnu.org> Reply-To: rms@gnu.org Content-Type: text/plain; charset=Utf-8 Injection-Info: blaine.gmane.org; posting-host="blaine.gmane.org:195.159.176.226"; logging-data="51453"; mail-complaints-to="usenet@blaine.gmane.org" Cc: contovob@tcd.ie, kisik21@fireburn.ru, 34639@debbugs.gnu.org To: Eli Zaretskii Original-X-From: bug-gnu-emacs-bounces+geb-bug-gnu-emacs=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Sun Mar 03 04:02:44 2019 Return-path: Envelope-to: geb-bug-gnu-emacs@m.gmane.org Original-Received: from lists.gnu.org ([209.51.188.17]) by blaine.gmane.org with esmtps (TLS1.0:RSA_AES_256_CBC_SHA1:256) (Exim 4.89) (envelope-from ) id 1h0HOl-000DFc-KI for geb-bug-gnu-emacs@m.gmane.org; Sun, 03 Mar 2019 04:02:43 +0100 Original-Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1]:33478 helo=lists.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1h0HOk-0000QC-Lh for geb-bug-gnu-emacs@m.gmane.org; Sat, 02 Mar 2019 22:02:42 -0500 Original-Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([209.51.188.92]:43224) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1h0HO8-0008VL-Qk for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Sat, 02 Mar 2019 22:02:05 -0500 Original-Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1h0HO6-0004TU-T1 for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Sat, 02 Mar 2019 22:02:04 -0500 Original-Received: from debbugs.gnu.org ([209.51.188.43]:44481) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.0:RSA_AES_128_CBC_SHA1:16) (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1h0HO6-0004T9-AV for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Sat, 02 Mar 2019 22:02:02 -0500 Original-Received: from Debian-debbugs by debbugs.gnu.org with local (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1h0HO6-0005fX-6p for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Sat, 02 Mar 2019 22:02:02 -0500 X-Loop: help-debbugs@gnu.org Resent-From: Richard Stallman Original-Sender: "Debbugs-submit" Resent-CC: bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org Resent-Date: Sun, 03 Mar 2019 03:02:02 +0000 Resent-Message-ID: Resent-Sender: help-debbugs@gnu.org X-GNU-PR-Message: followup 34639 X-GNU-PR-Package: emacs Original-Received: via spool by 34639-submit@debbugs.gnu.org id=B34639.155158210321767 (code B ref 34639); Sun, 03 Mar 2019 03:02:02 +0000 Original-Received: (at 34639) by debbugs.gnu.org; 3 Mar 2019 03:01:43 +0000 Original-Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1]:58025 helo=debbugs.gnu.org) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1h0HNm-0005f0-Rx for submit@debbugs.gnu.org; Sat, 02 Mar 2019 22:01:43 -0500 Original-Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([209.51.188.92]:56954) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1h0HNk-0005em-GC for 34639@debbugs.gnu.org; Sat, 02 Mar 2019 22:01:40 -0500 Original-Received: from fencepost.gnu.org ([2001:470:142:3::e]:51356) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1h0HNe-00040S-Nu; Sat, 02 Mar 2019 22:01:34 -0500 Original-Received: from rms by fencepost.gnu.org with local (Exim 4.82) (envelope-from ) id 1h0HNe-0003yr-JP; Sat, 02 Mar 2019 22:01:34 -0500 In-Reply-To: <83r2bphidl.fsf@gnu.org> (message from Eli Zaretskii on Sat, 02 Mar 2019 08:59:02 +0200) X-detected-operating-system: by eggs.gnu.org: GNU/Linux 2.2.x-3.x [generic] X-BeenThere: debbugs-submit@debbugs.gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.18 Precedence: list X-detected-operating-system: by eggs.gnu.org: GNU/Linux 2.2.x-3.x [generic] X-Received-From: 209.51.188.43 X-BeenThere: bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org List-Id: "Bug reports for GNU Emacs, the Swiss army knife of text editors" List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: bug-gnu-emacs-bounces+geb-bug-gnu-emacs=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Original-Sender: "bug-gnu-emacs" Xref: news.gmane.org gmane.emacs.bugs:155985 Archived-At: [[[ To any NSA and FBI agents reading my email: please consider ]]] [[[ whether defending the US Constitution against all enemies, ]]] [[[ foreign or domestic, requires you to follow Snowden's example. ]]] > > Why is it better if people use the display margins via > > linum (not core) rather than by an option in native line numbers? > > I don't see that it makes much difference to the issues of > > future maintenance. > It makes a difference because we can tell them to drop linum if they > have problems with display margins. And because we don't have to deal > with bug reports about such conflicts. If we are comparing two options, (1) Linum mode and (2) a flag to make native line numbers use the display margins, I don't see why either one provides advantages over the other in those two areas. To me it seems they would be equivalent. Can you explain why? -- Dr Richard Stallman President, Free Software Foundation (https://gnu.org, https://fsf.org) Internet Hall-of-Famer (https://internethalloffame.org)