* bug#30086: Please add a flag to stop etags from falling back to Fortran and C
@ 2018-01-12 12:06 Dmitry Gutov
2018-01-12 13:09 ` Francesco Potortì
0 siblings, 1 reply; 3+ messages in thread
From: Dmitry Gutov @ 2018-01-12 12:06 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: 30086
Previous discussion here:
http://lists.gnu.org/archive/html/emacs-devel/2018-01/msg00323.html
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 3+ messages in thread
* bug#30086: Please add a flag to stop etags from falling back to Fortran and C
2018-01-12 12:06 bug#30086: Please add a flag to stop etags from falling back to Fortran and C Dmitry Gutov
@ 2018-01-12 13:09 ` Francesco Potortì
2018-01-12 14:00 ` Eli Zaretskii
0 siblings, 1 reply; 3+ messages in thread
From: Francesco Potortì @ 2018-01-12 13:09 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Dmitry Gutov; +Cc: 30086
>Previous discussion here:
>http://lists.gnu.org/archive/html/emacs-devel/2018-01/msg00323.html
I argue that fallbacks should be removed, or at least the default
reversed, i.e., not use fallback unless some --legacy-fallback option is
given.
Falbacks only make sense in an environment where Fortran and C are much
more prominently used than other languages AND where it is common to use
nonstandard suffixes for the source files.
Neither assumption is true nowadays, and I'd say it hasn't been true for
projects started in maybe the latest 20 years, while it may have been
true for legacy projects at the time when Etags was written.
Those legacy projects are the only reason why Etags should keep using a
default. I assume that if people need to support Fortran or C
environments 20 years old without even changing the file name suffixes,
they are probably forced to use old tools, among which old Etag
versions, and we should not worry about such strict compatibility.
So, I'd say, just remove fallbacks, or use them only if a
--legacy-fallback option is used.
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 3+ messages in thread
* bug#30086: Please add a flag to stop etags from falling back to Fortran and C
2018-01-12 13:09 ` Francesco Potortì
@ 2018-01-12 14:00 ` Eli Zaretskii
0 siblings, 0 replies; 3+ messages in thread
From: Eli Zaretskii @ 2018-01-12 14:00 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Francesco Potortì; +Cc: 30086, dgutov
> Date: Fri, 12 Jan 2018 14:09:40 +0100
> From: Francesco Potortì <pot@gnu.org>
> Cc: 30086@debbugs.gnu.org
>
> So, I'd say, just remove fallbacks, or use them only if a
> --legacy-fallback option is used.
The latter, of course (if the default is to change).
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 3+ messages in thread
end of thread, other threads:[~2018-01-12 14:00 UTC | newest]
Thread overview: 3+ messages (download: mbox.gz follow: Atom feed
-- links below jump to the message on this page --
2018-01-12 12:06 bug#30086: Please add a flag to stop etags from falling back to Fortran and C Dmitry Gutov
2018-01-12 13:09 ` Francesco Potortì
2018-01-12 14:00 ` Eli Zaretskii
Code repositories for project(s) associated with this public inbox
https://git.savannah.gnu.org/cgit/emacs.git
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for read-only IMAP folder(s) and NNTP newsgroup(s).