From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Path: news.gmane.org!.POSTED!not-for-mail From: Richard Stallman Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.bugs Subject: bug#6991: Please keep bytecode out of *Backtrace* buffers Date: Sat, 26 Nov 2016 18:45:23 -0500 Message-ID: References: <8739tm9vzl.fsf@jidanni.org> <87vb5ct1lz.fsf@gnus.org> <2223f654-1e67-4a9a-a471-828fd4078410@default> <87fumokzbp.fsf@users.sourceforge.net> <83oa1bc3x2.fsf@gnu.org> <87d1hrlek2.fsf@users.sourceforge.net> <83eg27bjah.fsf@gnu.org> <87a8cvlcmk.fsf@users.sourceforge.net> <8360njb9o5.fsf@gnu.org> <877f7zksm0.fsf@users.sourceforge.net> <83oa1a9msk.fsf@gnu.org> <83vavf73ei.fsf@gnu.org> <8360ne6v1q.fsf@gnu.org> <874m2ujh2v.fsf@users.sourceforge.net> Reply-To: rms@gnu.org NNTP-Posting-Host: blaine.gmane.org Content-Type: text/plain; charset=Utf-8 X-Trace: blaine.gmane.org 1480204006 28107 195.159.176.226 (26 Nov 2016 23:46:46 GMT) X-Complaints-To: usenet@blaine.gmane.org NNTP-Posting-Date: Sat, 26 Nov 2016 23:46:46 +0000 (UTC) Cc: lekktu@gmail.com, johnw@gnu.org, monnier@iro.umontreal.ca, 6991@debbugs.gnu.org, larsi@gnus.org To: npostavs@users.sourceforge.net Original-X-From: bug-gnu-emacs-bounces+geb-bug-gnu-emacs=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Sun Nov 27 00:46:42 2016 Return-path: Envelope-to: geb-bug-gnu-emacs@m.gmane.org Original-Received: from lists.gnu.org ([208.118.235.17]) by blaine.gmane.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1cAmg4-0005yT-5N for geb-bug-gnu-emacs@m.gmane.org; Sun, 27 Nov 2016 00:46:40 +0100 Original-Received: from localhost ([::1]:52101 helo=lists.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1cAmg4-0006cY-Vr for geb-bug-gnu-emacs@m.gmane.org; Sat, 26 Nov 2016 18:46:41 -0500 Original-Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:4830:134:3::10]:53535) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1cAmfU-0006HJ-5b for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Sat, 26 Nov 2016 18:46:05 -0500 Original-Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1cAmfT-0002iW-8a for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Sat, 26 Nov 2016 18:46:04 -0500 Original-Received: from debbugs.gnu.org ([208.118.235.43]:55556) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.0:RSA_AES_128_CBC_SHA1:16) (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1cAmfT-0002i1-5N for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Sat, 26 Nov 2016 18:46:03 -0500 Original-Received: from Debian-debbugs by debbugs.gnu.org with local (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1cAmfS-0006n4-Tr for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Sat, 26 Nov 2016 18:46:02 -0500 X-Loop: help-debbugs@gnu.org Resent-From: Richard Stallman Original-Sender: "Debbugs-submit" Resent-CC: bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org Resent-Date: Sat, 26 Nov 2016 23:46:02 +0000 Resent-Message-ID: Resent-Sender: help-debbugs@gnu.org X-GNU-PR-Message: followup 6991 X-GNU-PR-Package: emacs X-GNU-PR-Keywords: Original-Received: via spool by 6991-submit@debbugs.gnu.org id=B6991.148020394826064 (code B ref 6991); Sat, 26 Nov 2016 23:46:02 +0000 Original-Received: (at 6991) by debbugs.gnu.org; 26 Nov 2016 23:45:48 +0000 Original-Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1]:42719 helo=debbugs.gnu.org) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1cAmfE-0006mJ-8G for submit@debbugs.gnu.org; Sat, 26 Nov 2016 18:45:48 -0500 Original-Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([208.118.235.92]:33541) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1cAmfC-0006lt-DT for 6991@debbugs.gnu.org; Sat, 26 Nov 2016 18:45:46 -0500 Original-Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1cAmf1-0002Eg-Aw for 6991@debbugs.gnu.org; Sat, 26 Nov 2016 18:45:36 -0500 Original-Received: from fencepost.gnu.org ([2001:4830:134:3::e]:47233) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1cAmep-00021a-Tx; Sat, 26 Nov 2016 18:45:23 -0500 Original-Received: from rms by fencepost.gnu.org with local (Exim 4.82) (envelope-from ) id 1cAmep-0006mz-2W; Sat, 26 Nov 2016 18:45:23 -0500 In-reply-to: <874m2ujh2v.fsf@users.sourceforge.net> (npostavs@users.sourceforge.net) X-detected-operating-system: by eggs.gnu.org: GNU/Linux 2.2.x-3.x [generic] X-BeenThere: debbugs-submit@debbugs.gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.18 Precedence: list X-detected-operating-system: by eggs.gnu.org: GNU/Linux 2.2.x-3.x [generic] X-Received-From: 208.118.235.43 X-BeenThere: bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org List-Id: "Bug reports for GNU Emacs, the Swiss army knife of text editors" List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: bug-gnu-emacs-bounces+geb-bug-gnu-emacs=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Original-Sender: "bug-gnu-emacs" Xref: news.gmane.org gmane.emacs.bugs:126136 Archived-At: [[[ To any NSA and FBI agents reading my email: please consider ]]] [[[ whether defending the US Constitution against all enemies, ]]] [[[ foreign or domestic, requires you to follow Snowden's example. ]]] Why not take the bytecode _entirely_ out of the backtrace buffer? Is it ever any use? I proposed a week ago to print bytecode functions differently, without showing the bytecode. -- Dr Richard Stallman President, Free Software Foundation (gnu.org, fsf.org) Internet Hall-of-Famer (internethalloffame.org) Skype: No way! See stallman.org/skype.html.