From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Path: news.gmane.org!.POSTED!not-for-mail From: Richard Stallman Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.bugs Subject: bug#24520: 25.1.50; calccard.tex has somewhat unclear licensing Date: Mon, 14 Nov 2016 19:29:25 -0500 Message-ID: References: <87wpi2l9yp.fsf@Sam-laptop.i-did-not-set--mail-host-address--so-tickle-me> <83h98keben.fsf@gnu.org> <83vawt1zay.fsf@gnu.org> <81k2d7bvhh.fsf@fencepost.gnu.org> <83h983nr67.fsf@gnu.org> <83lgx7qxjb.fsf@gnu.org> <834m3urfbo.fsf@gnu.org> <83h97pn8hh.fsf@gnu.org> <8337j8mo2g.fsf@gnu.org> <83mvh5ceym.fsf@gnu.org> <838tsncprj.fsf@gnu.org> <837f86hxwt.fsf@gnu.org> Reply-To: rms@gnu.org NNTP-Posting-Host: blaine.gmane.org Content-Type: text/plain; charset=Utf-8 X-Trace: blaine.gmane.org 1479169837 12858 195.159.176.226 (15 Nov 2016 00:30:37 GMT) X-Complaints-To: usenet@blaine.gmane.org NNTP-Posting-Date: Tue, 15 Nov 2016 00:30:37 +0000 (UTC) Cc: naesten@gmail.com, 24520@debbugs.gnu.org To: Eli Zaretskii Original-X-From: bug-gnu-emacs-bounces+geb-bug-gnu-emacs=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Tue Nov 15 01:30:33 2016 Return-path: Envelope-to: geb-bug-gnu-emacs@m.gmane.org Original-Received: from lists.gnu.org ([208.118.235.17]) by blaine.gmane.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1c6Rda-0008C4-D5 for geb-bug-gnu-emacs@m.gmane.org; Tue, 15 Nov 2016 01:30:10 +0100 Original-Received: from localhost ([::1]:43360 helo=lists.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1c6Rda-0004ii-MW for geb-bug-gnu-emacs@m.gmane.org; Mon, 14 Nov 2016 19:30:10 -0500 Original-Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:4830:134:3::10]:41844) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1c6RdT-0004ia-AU for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Mon, 14 Nov 2016 19:30:04 -0500 Original-Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1c6RdS-0007YU-Du for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Mon, 14 Nov 2016 19:30:03 -0500 Original-Received: from debbugs.gnu.org ([208.118.235.43]:42093) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.0:RSA_AES_128_CBC_SHA1:16) (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1c6RdS-0007YM-AH for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Mon, 14 Nov 2016 19:30:02 -0500 Original-Received: from Debian-debbugs by debbugs.gnu.org with local (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1c6RdS-0000rC-4o for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Mon, 14 Nov 2016 19:30:02 -0500 X-Loop: help-debbugs@gnu.org Resent-From: Richard Stallman Original-Sender: "Debbugs-submit" Resent-CC: bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org Resent-Date: Tue, 15 Nov 2016 00:30:02 +0000 Resent-Message-ID: Resent-Sender: help-debbugs@gnu.org X-GNU-PR-Message: followup 24520 X-GNU-PR-Package: emacs X-GNU-PR-Keywords: Original-Received: via spool by 24520-submit@debbugs.gnu.org id=B24520.14791697763236 (code B ref 24520); Tue, 15 Nov 2016 00:30:02 +0000 Original-Received: (at 24520) by debbugs.gnu.org; 15 Nov 2016 00:29:36 +0000 Original-Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1]:57492 helo=debbugs.gnu.org) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1c6Rd2-0000q8-1a for submit@debbugs.gnu.org; Mon, 14 Nov 2016 19:29:36 -0500 Original-Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([208.118.235.92]:50578) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1c6Rd0-0000pt-Bc for 24520@debbugs.gnu.org; Mon, 14 Nov 2016 19:29:34 -0500 Original-Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1c6Rcu-0007Hv-K3 for 24520@debbugs.gnu.org; Mon, 14 Nov 2016 19:29:29 -0500 Original-Received: from fencepost.gnu.org ([2001:4830:134:3::e]:45703) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1c6Rcs-0007HO-Hl; Mon, 14 Nov 2016 19:29:26 -0500 Original-Received: from rms by fencepost.gnu.org with local (Exim 4.82) (envelope-from ) id 1c6Rcr-0002Vq-Ol; Mon, 14 Nov 2016 19:29:25 -0500 In-reply-to: <837f86hxwt.fsf@gnu.org> (message from Eli Zaretskii on Mon, 14 Nov 2016 17:41:06 +0200) X-detected-operating-system: by eggs.gnu.org: GNU/Linux 2.2.x-3.x [generic] X-BeenThere: debbugs-submit@debbugs.gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.18 Precedence: list X-detected-operating-system: by eggs.gnu.org: GNU/Linux 2.2.x-3.x [generic] X-Received-From: 208.118.235.43 X-BeenThere: bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org List-Id: "Bug reports for GNU Emacs, the Swiss army knife of text editors" List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: bug-gnu-emacs-bounces+geb-bug-gnu-emacs=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Original-Sender: "bug-gnu-emacs" Xref: news.gmane.org gmane.emacs.bugs:125703 Archived-At: [[[ To any NSA and FBI agents reading my email: please consider ]]] [[[ whether defending the US Constitution against all enemies, ]]] [[[ foreign or domestic, requires you to follow Snowden's example. ]]] > I don't understand why should we treat these files differently from > any other file in the tree. They all speak about "GNU Emacs". The reason it seems good to me to change those words for the refcards is that the license exception, and the way the tex output files are handled, is quite different from what we permit for GNU Emacs itself. I think the situation will be clearer if we don't say these are "part of GNU Emacs." -- Dr Richard Stallman President, Free Software Foundation (gnu.org, fsf.org) Internet Hall-of-Famer (internethalloffame.org) Skype: No way! See stallman.org/skype.html.