From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Path: news.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: Richard Stallman Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.bugs Subject: bug#23640: 25.1.50; Getting rid of compiler warnings Date: Wed, 01 Jun 2016 16:37:52 -0400 Message-ID: References: <574E9E50.6040301@cs.ucla.edu> Reply-To: rms@gnu.org NNTP-Posting-Host: plane.gmane.org Content-Type: text/plain; charset=Utf-8 X-Trace: ger.gmane.org 1464813569 10236 80.91.229.3 (1 Jun 2016 20:39:29 GMT) X-Complaints-To: usenet@ger.gmane.org NNTP-Posting-Date: Wed, 1 Jun 2016 20:39:29 +0000 (UTC) Cc: 23640@debbugs.gnu.org, andrewjmoreton@gmail.com To: Paul Eggert Original-X-From: bug-gnu-emacs-bounces+geb-bug-gnu-emacs=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Wed Jun 01 22:39:19 2016 Return-path: Envelope-to: geb-bug-gnu-emacs@m.gmane.org Original-Received: from lists.gnu.org ([208.118.235.17]) by plane.gmane.org with esmtp (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1b8Cv5-0001ck-AD for geb-bug-gnu-emacs@m.gmane.org; Wed, 01 Jun 2016 22:39:15 +0200 Original-Received: from localhost ([::1]:43995 helo=lists.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1b8Cv4-0005eH-6G for geb-bug-gnu-emacs@m.gmane.org; Wed, 01 Jun 2016 16:39:14 -0400 Original-Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:4830:134:3::10]:44882) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1b8Cuy-0005eA-0B for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Wed, 01 Jun 2016 16:39:08 -0400 Original-Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1b8Cus-0001ds-C3 for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Wed, 01 Jun 2016 16:39:06 -0400 Original-Received: from debbugs.gnu.org ([208.118.235.43]:37861) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1b8Cus-0001dk-8V for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Wed, 01 Jun 2016 16:39:02 -0400 Original-Received: from Debian-debbugs by debbugs.gnu.org with local (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1b8Cus-0000SB-3x for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Wed, 01 Jun 2016 16:39:02 -0400 X-Loop: help-debbugs@gnu.org Resent-From: Richard Stallman Original-Sender: "Debbugs-submit" Resent-CC: bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org Resent-Date: Wed, 01 Jun 2016 20:39:02 +0000 Resent-Message-ID: Resent-Sender: help-debbugs@gnu.org X-GNU-PR-Message: followup 23640 X-GNU-PR-Package: emacs X-GNU-PR-Keywords: Original-Received: via spool by 23640-submit@debbugs.gnu.org id=B23640.14648134841675 (code B ref 23640); Wed, 01 Jun 2016 20:39:02 +0000 Original-Received: (at 23640) by debbugs.gnu.org; 1 Jun 2016 20:38:04 +0000 Original-Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1]:50197 helo=debbugs.gnu.org) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1b8Ctw-0000Qx-0g for submit@debbugs.gnu.org; Wed, 01 Jun 2016 16:38:04 -0400 Original-Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([208.118.235.92]:53118) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1b8Ctu-0000QT-OJ for 23640@debbugs.gnu.org; Wed, 01 Jun 2016 16:38:03 -0400 Original-Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1b8Cto-00012X-Hk for 23640@debbugs.gnu.org; Wed, 01 Jun 2016 16:37:57 -0400 Original-Received: from fencepost.gnu.org ([2001:4830:134:3::e]:48466) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1b8Ctl-0000zl-GA; Wed, 01 Jun 2016 16:37:53 -0400 Original-Received: from rms by fencepost.gnu.org with local (Exim 4.82) (envelope-from ) id 1b8Ctk-0008Ou-P9; Wed, 01 Jun 2016 16:37:52 -0400 In-reply-to: <574E9E50.6040301@cs.ucla.edu> (message from Paul Eggert on Wed, 1 Jun 2016 01:35:28 -0700) X-detected-operating-system: by eggs.gnu.org: GNU/Linux 2.2.x-3.x [generic] X-BeenThere: debbugs-submit@debbugs.gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.18 Precedence: list X-detected-operating-system: by eggs.gnu.org: GNU/Linux 2.2.x-3.x [generic] X-Received-From: 208.118.235.43 X-BeenThere: bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org List-Id: "Bug reports for GNU Emacs, the Swiss army knife of text editors" List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: bug-gnu-emacs-bounces+geb-bug-gnu-emacs=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Original-Sender: "bug-gnu-emacs" Xref: news.gmane.org gmane.emacs.bugs:118953 Archived-At: [[[ To any NSA and FBI agents reading my email: please consider ]]] [[[ whether defending the US Constitution against all enemies, ]]] [[[ foreign or domestic, requires you to follow Snowden's example. ]]] > This wouldn't be enough to handle other cases, e.g., 'IF_LINT (= Qnil)' and > 'IF_LINT (volatile)'. A macro UNUSED_LISP could handle the first. What is the reason for writing IF_LINT (volatile) instead of just volatile? -- Dr Richard Stallman President, Free Software Foundation (gnu.org, fsf.org) Internet Hall-of-Famer (internethalloffame.org) Skype: No way! See stallman.org/skype.html.