From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Path: news.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: Eli Zaretskii Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.bugs Subject: bug#10578: 24.0.92; No png images on OpenSUSE 12.1 Date: Thu, 26 Jan 2012 08:45:44 -0500 Message-ID: References: <87y5sz1ztp.fsf@linux-hvfx.site> <83k44j3djg.fsf@gnu.org> <83ipk339sj.fsf@gnu.org> <83hazn38tp.fsf@gnu.org> <83fwf731y8.fsf@gnu.org> <87y5svinp8.fsf@gnus.org> Reply-To: Eli Zaretskii NNTP-Posting-Host: lo.gmane.org Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit X-Trace: dough.gmane.org 1327585610 13760 80.91.229.12 (26 Jan 2012 13:46:50 GMT) X-Complaints-To: usenet@dough.gmane.org NNTP-Posting-Date: Thu, 26 Jan 2012 13:46:50 +0000 (UTC) Cc: larsi@gnus.org, 10578@debbugs.gnu.org To: Juanma Barranquero Original-X-From: bug-gnu-emacs-bounces+geb-bug-gnu-emacs=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Thu Jan 26 14:46:45 2012 Return-path: Envelope-to: geb-bug-gnu-emacs@m.gmane.org Original-Received: from lists.gnu.org ([140.186.70.17]) by lo.gmane.org with esmtp (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1RqPf2-0000g8-5T for geb-bug-gnu-emacs@m.gmane.org; Thu, 26 Jan 2012 14:46:44 +0100 Original-Received: from localhost ([::1]:51491 helo=lists.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1RqPf1-0002qJ-O3 for geb-bug-gnu-emacs@m.gmane.org; Thu, 26 Jan 2012 08:46:43 -0500 Original-Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([140.186.70.92]:36919) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1RqPeu-0002Rj-6s for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Thu, 26 Jan 2012 08:46:41 -0500 Original-Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1RqPep-0002Jr-Fr for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Thu, 26 Jan 2012 08:46:36 -0500 Original-Received: from debbugs.gnu.org ([140.186.70.43]:39658) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1RqPep-0002Jg-D1 for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Thu, 26 Jan 2012 08:46:31 -0500 Original-Received: from Debian-debbugs by debbugs.gnu.org with local (Exim 4.72) (envelope-from ) id 1RqPfK-00012x-LF for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Thu, 26 Jan 2012 08:47:02 -0500 X-Loop: help-debbugs@gnu.org Resent-From: Eli Zaretskii Original-Sender: debbugs-submit-bounces@debbugs.gnu.org Resent-CC: bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org Resent-Date: Thu, 26 Jan 2012 13:47:02 +0000 Resent-Message-ID: Resent-Sender: help-debbugs@gnu.org X-GNU-PR-Message: followup 10578 X-GNU-PR-Package: emacs X-GNU-PR-Keywords: Original-Received: via spool by 10578-submit@debbugs.gnu.org id=B10578.13275855873973 (code B ref 10578); Thu, 26 Jan 2012 13:47:02 +0000 Original-Received: (at 10578) by debbugs.gnu.org; 26 Jan 2012 13:46:27 +0000 Original-Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1]:45045 helo=debbugs.gnu.org) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.72) (envelope-from ) id 1RqPeh-00011y-6Q for submit@debbugs.gnu.org; Thu, 26 Jan 2012 08:46:26 -0500 Original-Received: from fencepost.gnu.org ([140.186.70.10]:40088 ident=Debian-exim) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.72) (envelope-from ) id 1RqPeb-00011n-30 for 10578@debbugs.gnu.org; Thu, 26 Jan 2012 08:46:21 -0500 Original-Received: from eliz by fencepost.gnu.org with local (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1RqPe4-0005gp-6O; Thu, 26 Jan 2012 08:45:44 -0500 In-reply-to: (message from Juanma Barranquero on Thu, 26 Jan 2012 13:27:30 +0100) X-BeenThere: debbugs-submit@debbugs.gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.13 Precedence: list X-detected-operating-system: by eggs.gnu.org: GNU/Linux 2.6 (newer, 2) X-Received-From: 140.186.70.43 X-BeenThere: bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org List-Id: "Bug reports for GNU Emacs, the Swiss army knife of text editors" List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: bug-gnu-emacs-bounces+geb-bug-gnu-emacs=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Original-Sender: bug-gnu-emacs-bounces+geb-bug-gnu-emacs=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Xref: news.gmane.org gmane.emacs.bugs:56030 Archived-At: > From: Juanma Barranquero > Date: Thu, 26 Jan 2012 13:27:30 +0100 > Cc: larsi@gnus.org, 10578@debbugs.gnu.org > > On Thu, Jan 26, 2012 at 06:43, Eli Zaretskii wrote: > > > Why not the first one?  More often than not, the others, if different, > > will be the consequences of the first one, which is the root cause. > > And if they are all identical, it doesn't matter which one you show ;-) > > Just because delayed-warnings-list is ordered last-to-first and it's > easier to find the last one that the first one. > > But this assumes that all such display warnings are produced by calls > to warn_about_display_error, and so they are all > > Error (display): Please check *Messages* I didn't understand that all the messages are identical, no matter what triggered them. If that's how we are going to implement them, it indeed makes no difference which one you display. To tell the truth, I don't like such vague warning, since the reference to *Messages* is not specific enough to be useful, IMO. It is better to show some more specific text in the delayed warning itself.