From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Path: news.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: Eli Zaretskii Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.bugs Subject: bug#10296: 24.0.92; check_glyph_memory still aborting Date: Wed, 14 Dec 2011 03:28:55 -0500 Message-ID: References: <4EE8548C.9030901@gmx.at> Reply-To: Eli Zaretskii NNTP-Posting-Host: lo.gmane.org X-Trace: dough.gmane.org 1323851395 30519 80.91.229.12 (14 Dec 2011 08:29:55 GMT) X-Complaints-To: usenet@dough.gmane.org NNTP-Posting-Date: Wed, 14 Dec 2011 08:29:55 +0000 (UTC) Cc: 10296@debbugs.gnu.org To: martin rudalics Original-X-From: bug-gnu-emacs-bounces+geb-bug-gnu-emacs=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Wed Dec 14 09:29:51 2011 Return-path: Envelope-to: geb-bug-gnu-emacs@m.gmane.org Original-Received: from lists.gnu.org ([140.186.70.17]) by lo.gmane.org with esmtp (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1RakDm-0005NI-5t for geb-bug-gnu-emacs@m.gmane.org; Wed, 14 Dec 2011 09:29:50 +0100 Original-Received: from localhost ([::1]:57636 helo=lists.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1RakDl-0008Ec-Mp for geb-bug-gnu-emacs@m.gmane.org; Wed, 14 Dec 2011 03:29:49 -0500 Original-Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([140.186.70.92]:33477) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1RakDi-0008EK-Rv for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Wed, 14 Dec 2011 03:29:48 -0500 Original-Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1RakDb-0003gQ-7J for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Wed, 14 Dec 2011 03:29:46 -0500 Original-Received: from debbugs.gnu.org ([140.186.70.43]:36569) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1RakDb-0003gM-4X for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Wed, 14 Dec 2011 03:29:39 -0500 Original-Received: from Debian-debbugs by debbugs.gnu.org with local (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1RakEv-0004V1-Fj for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Wed, 14 Dec 2011 03:31:01 -0500 X-Loop: help-debbugs@gnu.org Resent-From: Eli Zaretskii Original-Sender: debbugs-submit-bounces@debbugs.gnu.org Resent-CC: bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org Resent-Date: Wed, 14 Dec 2011 08:31:01 +0000 Resent-Message-ID: Resent-Sender: help-debbugs@gnu.org X-GNU-PR-Message: followup 10296 X-GNU-PR-Package: emacs X-GNU-PR-Keywords: Original-Received: via spool by 10296-submit@debbugs.gnu.org id=B10296.132385142117248 (code B ref 10296); Wed, 14 Dec 2011 08:31:01 +0000 Original-Received: (at 10296) by debbugs.gnu.org; 14 Dec 2011 08:30:21 +0000 Original-Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1] helo=debbugs.gnu.org) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1RakEG-0004U8-TD for submit@debbugs.gnu.org; Wed, 14 Dec 2011 03:30:21 -0500 Original-Received: from fencepost.gnu.org ([140.186.70.10]) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1RakEE-0004U1-C7 for 10296@debbugs.gnu.org; Wed, 14 Dec 2011 03:30:19 -0500 Original-Received: from eliz by fencepost.gnu.org with local (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1RakCt-00032B-6I; Wed, 14 Dec 2011 03:28:55 -0500 In-reply-to: <4EE8548C.9030901@gmx.at> (message from martin rudalics on Wed, 14 Dec 2011 08:47:24 +0100) X-BeenThere: debbugs-submit@debbugs.gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.11 Precedence: list Resent-Date: Wed, 14 Dec 2011 03:31:01 -0500 X-detected-operating-system: by eggs.gnu.org: GNU/Linux 2.6 (newer, 2) X-Received-From: 140.186.70.43 X-BeenThere: bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org List-Id: "Bug reports for GNU Emacs, the Swiss army knife of text editors" List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: bug-gnu-emacs-bounces+geb-bug-gnu-emacs=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Original-Sender: bug-gnu-emacs-bounces+geb-bug-gnu-emacs=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Xref: news.gmane.org gmane.emacs.bugs:54938 Archived-At: > Date: Wed, 14 Dec 2011 08:47:24 +0100 > From: martin rudalics > > Bugs #8775 and #9943 seem to be still around. The scenario for #9943 > needs one additional line to trigger here on Thanks, but why did you file a new bug? why not write to an address of #9943 instead? > So with emacs -Q evaluating > > (progn > (setq default-frame-alist (cons '(height . 0.2) default-frame-alist)) > (setq debug-on-error t)) > > and subsequently doing > > C-x 5 2 > C-x C-c > > gets me the following backtrace: > > (gdb) bt > #0 w32_abort () at w32fns.c:7191 > #1 0x01061dbd in check_glyph_memory () at dispnew.c:2399 > #2 0x01002eaa in shut_down_emacs (sig=0, no_x=0, stuff=50145306) > at emacs.c:2104 I will look into this in a few days if no one beats me to it.