From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Path: news.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: Eli Zaretskii Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.bugs Subject: bug#2975: `texinfo-master-menu' doesn't work. Date: Mon, 12 Dec 2011 08:02:01 -0500 Message-ID: References: <20090412213340.GA3615@muc.de> <837h24mwfs.fsf@gnu.org> <20111211173859.GA2755@acm.acm> <83mxazkm5d.fsf@gnu.org> <20111212122544.GA2910@acm.acm> Reply-To: Eli Zaretskii NNTP-Posting-Host: lo.gmane.org X-Trace: dough.gmane.org 1323694991 8739 80.91.229.12 (12 Dec 2011 13:03:11 GMT) X-Complaints-To: usenet@dough.gmane.org NNTP-Posting-Date: Mon, 12 Dec 2011 13:03:11 +0000 (UTC) Cc: 2975@debbugs.gnu.org To: Alan Mackenzie Original-X-From: bug-gnu-emacs-bounces+geb-bug-gnu-emacs=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Mon Dec 12 14:03:06 2011 Return-path: Envelope-to: geb-bug-gnu-emacs@m.gmane.org Original-Received: from lists.gnu.org ([140.186.70.17]) by lo.gmane.org with esmtp (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1Ra5X6-0001m4-Ee for geb-bug-gnu-emacs@m.gmane.org; Mon, 12 Dec 2011 14:03:05 +0100 Original-Received: from localhost ([::1]:58840 helo=lists.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1Ra5X5-0005Hq-M5 for geb-bug-gnu-emacs@m.gmane.org; Mon, 12 Dec 2011 08:03:03 -0500 Original-Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([140.186.70.92]:33126) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1Ra5Wz-0005Gm-5R for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Mon, 12 Dec 2011 08:03:00 -0500 Original-Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1Ra5Ws-0006cM-HB for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Mon, 12 Dec 2011 08:02:57 -0500 Original-Received: from debbugs.gnu.org ([140.186.70.43]:34300) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1Ra5Ws-0006cI-DX for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Mon, 12 Dec 2011 08:02:50 -0500 Original-Received: from Debian-debbugs by debbugs.gnu.org with local (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1Ra5Y2-0000x0-BW for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Mon, 12 Dec 2011 08:04:02 -0500 X-Loop: help-debbugs@gnu.org Resent-From: Eli Zaretskii Original-Sender: debbugs-submit-bounces@debbugs.gnu.org Resent-CC: bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org Resent-Date: Mon, 12 Dec 2011 13:04:02 +0000 Resent-Message-ID: Resent-Sender: help-debbugs@gnu.org X-GNU-PR-Message: followup 2975 X-GNU-PR-Package: emacs X-GNU-PR-Keywords: Original-Received: via spool by 2975-submit@debbugs.gnu.org id=B2975.13236949963598 (code B ref 2975); Mon, 12 Dec 2011 13:04:02 +0000 Original-Received: (at 2975) by debbugs.gnu.org; 12 Dec 2011 13:03:16 +0000 Original-Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1] helo=debbugs.gnu.org) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1Ra5XI-0000vz-GL for submit@debbugs.gnu.org; Mon, 12 Dec 2011 08:03:16 -0500 Original-Received: from fencepost.gnu.org ([140.186.70.10]) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1Ra5XF-0000vq-Gv for 2975@debbugs.gnu.org; Mon, 12 Dec 2011 08:03:14 -0500 Original-Received: from eliz by fencepost.gnu.org with local (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1Ra5W5-0002yz-20; Mon, 12 Dec 2011 08:02:01 -0500 In-reply-to: <20111212122544.GA2910@acm.acm> (message from Alan Mackenzie on Mon, 12 Dec 2011 12:25:44 +0000) X-BeenThere: debbugs-submit@debbugs.gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.11 Precedence: list Resent-Date: Mon, 12 Dec 2011 08:04:02 -0500 X-detected-operating-system: by eggs.gnu.org: GNU/Linux 2.6 (newer, 2) X-Received-From: 140.186.70.43 X-BeenThere: bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org List-Id: "Bug reports for GNU Emacs, the Swiss army knife of text editors" List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: bug-gnu-emacs-bounces+geb-bug-gnu-emacs=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Original-Sender: bug-gnu-emacs-bounces+geb-bug-gnu-emacs=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Xref: news.gmane.org gmane.emacs.bugs:54903 Archived-At: > Date: Mon, 12 Dec 2011 12:25:44 +0000 > Cc: 2975@debbugs.gnu.org > From: Alan Mackenzie > > > It sounds like your notion of "master menu" is different from what the > > command means, see above. > > THAT is the thing that's caused this discussion. I have conceptualised > "master menu" as the entire hierarchical thing starting at Top. You have > seen a separate menu in each node (including Top) and then @detailedmenu > as a summary, a distinct entity. Now everything is clear. Does the new doc string make this clear, or do you still see place for improvement? Thanks.