From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Path: news.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: Eli Zaretskii Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.bugs Subject: bug#10263: 24.0.92; emacs crash with auto-complete plugin Date: Sun, 11 Dec 2011 05:31:24 -0500 Message-ID: References: <831uscmc8b.fsf@gnu.org> <83zkf0kuej.fsf@gnu.org> <87iplniirx.fsf@live.com> Reply-To: Eli Zaretskii NNTP-Posting-Host: lo.gmane.org X-Trace: dough.gmane.org 1323599528 7737 80.91.229.12 (11 Dec 2011 10:32:08 GMT) X-Complaints-To: usenet@dough.gmane.org NNTP-Posting-Date: Sun, 11 Dec 2011 10:32:08 +0000 (UTC) Cc: 10263@debbugs.gnu.org, Alex Murray To: Original-X-From: bug-gnu-emacs-bounces+geb-bug-gnu-emacs=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Sun Dec 11 11:32:02 2011 Return-path: Envelope-to: geb-bug-gnu-emacs@m.gmane.org Original-Received: from lists.gnu.org ([140.186.70.17]) by lo.gmane.org with esmtp (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1RZghN-0006w1-1c for geb-bug-gnu-emacs@m.gmane.org; Sun, 11 Dec 2011 11:32:01 +0100 Original-Received: from localhost ([::1]:52965 helo=lists.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1RZghM-0004zv-D0 for geb-bug-gnu-emacs@m.gmane.org; Sun, 11 Dec 2011 05:32:00 -0500 Original-Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([140.186.70.92]:35867) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1RZghK-0004wF-4J for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Sun, 11 Dec 2011 05:31:59 -0500 Original-Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1RZghI-0000HJ-Rc for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Sun, 11 Dec 2011 05:31:58 -0500 Original-Received: from debbugs.gnu.org ([140.186.70.43]:33136) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1RZghI-0000HF-Om for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Sun, 11 Dec 2011 05:31:56 -0500 Original-Received: from Debian-debbugs by debbugs.gnu.org with local (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1RZgiM-0003pb-A9 for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Sun, 11 Dec 2011 05:33:02 -0500 X-Loop: help-debbugs@gnu.org Resent-From: Eli Zaretskii Original-Sender: debbugs-submit-bounces@debbugs.gnu.org Resent-CC: bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org Resent-Date: Sun, 11 Dec 2011 10:33:02 +0000 Resent-Message-ID: Resent-Sender: help-debbugs@gnu.org X-GNU-PR-Message: followup 10263 X-GNU-PR-Package: emacs X-GNU-PR-Keywords: Original-Received: via spool by 10263-submit@debbugs.gnu.org id=B10263.132359955314665 (code B ref 10263); Sun, 11 Dec 2011 10:33:02 +0000 Original-Received: (at 10263) by debbugs.gnu.org; 11 Dec 2011 10:32:33 +0000 Original-Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1] helo=debbugs.gnu.org) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1RZghs-0003oU-T2 for submit@debbugs.gnu.org; Sun, 11 Dec 2011 05:32:33 -0500 Original-Received: from fencepost.gnu.org ([140.186.70.10]) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1RZghr-0003oL-2r for 10263@debbugs.gnu.org; Sun, 11 Dec 2011 05:32:31 -0500 Original-Received: from eliz by fencepost.gnu.org with local (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1RZggm-0000Uq-RQ; Sun, 11 Dec 2011 05:31:24 -0500 In-reply-to: <87iplniirx.fsf@live.com> (yagnesh@live.com) X-BeenThere: debbugs-submit@debbugs.gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.11 Precedence: list Resent-Date: Sun, 11 Dec 2011 05:33:02 -0500 X-detected-operating-system: by eggs.gnu.org: GNU/Linux 2.6 (newer, 2) X-Received-From: 140.186.70.43 X-BeenThere: bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org List-Id: "Bug reports for GNU Emacs, the Swiss army knife of text editors" List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: bug-gnu-emacs-bounces+geb-bug-gnu-emacs=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Original-Sender: bug-gnu-emacs-bounces+geb-bug-gnu-emacs=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Xref: news.gmane.org gmane.emacs.bugs:54884 Archived-At: > From: > Date: Sun, 11 Dec 2011 18:01:38 +0900 > > Eli Zaretskii writes: > > > > > It could be. But then it could be not: the crash in 10159 is in a > > different place and is not reproducible. We can only deduce it's a > > duplicate if the OP will report that it no longer crashes for them. > > > > @Eli > I am the reporter of this bug. if you are referring me as OP here, > I already sent an email confirming that this bug is fixed. But some how > that mail didn't show up in the list. Your mail did show up, but I was not talking about this bug (#10263), I was talking about bug #10159, which AFAIK was filed by someone else. Glenn was wondering whether 10159 was the same bug, and is therefore also fixed. We'd need confirmation from Alex Murray about that.