From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Path: news.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: Eli Zaretskii Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.bugs Subject: bug#10101: rmailmm-test-multipart-handler hangs Date: Tue, 22 Nov 2011 01:13:45 -0500 Message-ID: References: <0dobw4ame7.fsf@fencepost.gnu.org> Reply-To: Eli Zaretskii NNTP-Posting-Host: lo.gmane.org X-Trace: dough.gmane.org 1321942495 24068 80.91.229.12 (22 Nov 2011 06:14:55 GMT) X-Complaints-To: usenet@dough.gmane.org NNTP-Posting-Date: Tue, 22 Nov 2011 06:14:55 +0000 (UTC) Cc: 10101@debbugs.gnu.org To: Glenn Morris Original-X-From: bug-gnu-emacs-bounces+geb-bug-gnu-emacs=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Tue Nov 22 07:14:51 2011 Return-path: Envelope-to: geb-bug-gnu-emacs@m.gmane.org Original-Received: from lists.gnu.org ([140.186.70.17]) by lo.gmane.org with esmtp (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1RSjd3-0001vJ-8E for geb-bug-gnu-emacs@m.gmane.org; Tue, 22 Nov 2011 07:14:49 +0100 Original-Received: from localhost ([::1]:41259 helo=lists.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1RSjd2-0001vd-Ni for geb-bug-gnu-emacs@m.gmane.org; Tue, 22 Nov 2011 01:14:48 -0500 Original-Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([140.186.70.92]:52511) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1RSjcz-0001vY-Ma for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Tue, 22 Nov 2011 01:14:46 -0500 Original-Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1RSjcy-0001lR-Dy for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Tue, 22 Nov 2011 01:14:45 -0500 Original-Received: from debbugs.gnu.org ([140.186.70.43]:60193) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1RSjcy-0001lN-BL for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Tue, 22 Nov 2011 01:14:44 -0500 Original-Received: from Debian-debbugs by debbugs.gnu.org with local (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1RSjeD-0007dn-Vu for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Tue, 22 Nov 2011 01:16:02 -0500 X-Loop: help-debbugs@gnu.org Resent-From: Eli Zaretskii Original-Sender: debbugs-submit-bounces@debbugs.gnu.org Resent-CC: bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org Resent-Date: Tue, 22 Nov 2011 06:16:01 +0000 Resent-Message-ID: Resent-Sender: help-debbugs@gnu.org X-GNU-PR-Message: followup 10101 X-GNU-PR-Package: emacs X-GNU-PR-Keywords: Original-Received: via spool by 10101-submit@debbugs.gnu.org id=B10101.132194250629303 (code B ref 10101); Tue, 22 Nov 2011 06:16:01 +0000 Original-Received: (at 10101) by debbugs.gnu.org; 22 Nov 2011 06:15:06 +0000 Original-Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1] helo=debbugs.gnu.org) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1RSjdK-0007ca-0W for submit@debbugs.gnu.org; Tue, 22 Nov 2011 01:15:06 -0500 Original-Received: from fencepost.gnu.org ([140.186.70.10]) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1RSjdH-0007cT-V4 for 10101@debbugs.gnu.org; Tue, 22 Nov 2011 01:15:04 -0500 Original-Received: from eliz by fencepost.gnu.org with local (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1RSjc1-0000DG-EG; Tue, 22 Nov 2011 01:13:45 -0500 In-reply-to: <0dobw4ame7.fsf@fencepost.gnu.org> (message from Glenn Morris on Mon, 21 Nov 2011 22:04:00 -0500) X-BeenThere: debbugs-submit@debbugs.gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.11 Precedence: list Resent-Date: Tue, 22 Nov 2011 01:16:01 -0500 X-detected-operating-system: by eggs.gnu.org: GNU/Linux 2.6 (newer, 2) X-Received-From: 140.186.70.43 X-BeenThere: bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org List-Id: "Bug reports for GNU Emacs, the Swiss army knife of text editors" List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: bug-gnu-emacs-bounces+geb-bug-gnu-emacs=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Original-Sender: bug-gnu-emacs-bounces+geb-bug-gnu-emacs=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Xref: news.gmane.org gmane.emacs.bugs:54155 Archived-At: > From: Glenn Morris > Date: Mon, 21 Nov 2011 22:04:00 -0500 > > emacs -Q -l ./test/rmailmm.el -f rmailmm-test-multipart-handler > -> hangs with 100% CPU usage > > Soon it prints: > > Warning (undo): Buffer `*test*' undo info was 12525097 bytes long. > The undo info was discarded because it exceeded `undo-outer-limit'. So which part of this is the problem: the CPU usage or the memory usage?