From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Path: news.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: Eli Zaretskii Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.bugs Subject: bug#6401: Date: Tue, 22 Nov 2011 00:38:51 -0500 Message-ID: References: <3ECA75E7-611F-4D2A-B6B9-C0FEC96D1070@hofland.no> <822479C3-8B02-4BD7-AB56-C5D7DD31D9D6@tenkan.org> Reply-To: Eli Zaretskii NNTP-Posting-Host: lo.gmane.org X-Trace: dough.gmane.org 1321940396 12857 80.91.229.12 (22 Nov 2011 05:39:56 GMT) X-Complaints-To: usenet@dough.gmane.org NNTP-Posting-Date: Tue, 22 Nov 2011 05:39:56 +0000 (UTC) Cc: 6401@debbugs.gnu.org, tim@tenkan.org To: Glenn Morris Original-X-From: bug-gnu-emacs-bounces+geb-bug-gnu-emacs=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Tue Nov 22 06:39:50 2011 Return-path: Envelope-to: geb-bug-gnu-emacs@m.gmane.org Original-Received: from lists.gnu.org ([140.186.70.17]) by lo.gmane.org with esmtp (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1RSj5B-0001xV-B8 for geb-bug-gnu-emacs@m.gmane.org; Tue, 22 Nov 2011 06:39:49 +0100 Original-Received: from localhost ([::1]:38219 helo=lists.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1RSj5A-0005NB-Tf for geb-bug-gnu-emacs@m.gmane.org; Tue, 22 Nov 2011 00:39:48 -0500 Original-Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([140.186.70.92]:44286) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1RSj58-0005Mu-Am for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Tue, 22 Nov 2011 00:39:47 -0500 Original-Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1RSj57-0005l7-8G for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Tue, 22 Nov 2011 00:39:46 -0500 Original-Received: from debbugs.gnu.org ([140.186.70.43]:60155) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1RSj57-0005l3-6q for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Tue, 22 Nov 2011 00:39:45 -0500 Original-Received: from Debian-debbugs by debbugs.gnu.org with local (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1RSj6M-0006VF-Lf for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Tue, 22 Nov 2011 00:41:02 -0500 X-Loop: help-debbugs@gnu.org Resent-From: Eli Zaretskii Original-Sender: debbugs-submit-bounces@debbugs.gnu.org Resent-CC: bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org Resent-Date: Tue, 22 Nov 2011 05:41:02 +0000 Resent-Message-ID: Resent-Sender: help-debbugs@gnu.org X-GNU-PR-Message: followup 6401 X-GNU-PR-Package: emacs X-GNU-PR-Keywords: Original-Received: via spool by 6401-submit@debbugs.gnu.org id=B6401.132194041424915 (code B ref 6401); Tue, 22 Nov 2011 05:41:02 +0000 Original-Received: (at 6401) by debbugs.gnu.org; 22 Nov 2011 05:40:14 +0000 Original-Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1] helo=debbugs.gnu.org) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1RSj5Z-0006Tn-MD for submit@debbugs.gnu.org; Tue, 22 Nov 2011 00:40:14 -0500 Original-Received: from fencepost.gnu.org ([140.186.70.10]) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1RSj5W-0006Te-1I for 6401@debbugs.gnu.org; Tue, 22 Nov 2011 00:40:11 -0500 Original-Received: from eliz by fencepost.gnu.org with local (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1RSj4F-0006cf-9s; Tue, 22 Nov 2011 00:38:51 -0500 In-reply-to: (message from Glenn Morris on Mon, 21 Nov 2011 18:31:18 -0500) X-BeenThere: debbugs-submit@debbugs.gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.11 Precedence: list Resent-Date: Tue, 22 Nov 2011 00:41:02 -0500 X-detected-operating-system: by eggs.gnu.org: GNU/Linux 2.6 (newer, 2) X-Received-From: 140.186.70.43 X-BeenThere: bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org List-Id: "Bug reports for GNU Emacs, the Swiss army knife of text editors" List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: bug-gnu-emacs-bounces+geb-bug-gnu-emacs=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Original-Sender: bug-gnu-emacs-bounces+geb-bug-gnu-emacs=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Xref: news.gmane.org gmane.emacs.bugs:54153 Archived-At: > From: Glenn Morris > Date: Mon, 21 Nov 2011 18:31:18 -0500 > Cc: 6401@debbugs.gnu.org > > If it is this issue, I don't know what to do about it. It came up before > in the context of the MS Windows port: > > http://lists.gnu.org/archive/html/emacs-devel/2008-10/msg00432.html > > I don't know if a solution was ever found for that. No solution was found, because I, like you, don't know what to do about it. Emacs has no way of knowing whether EMACSDATA etc. is set for it or for some other Emacs. So it cannot remove it from the environment when running subprocesses. Maybe someone could come up with some clever idea.