From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Path: news.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: Eli Zaretskii Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.bugs Subject: bug#10035: Crash in check_x_frame in w32fns.c Date: Mon, 14 Nov 2011 08:35:18 -0500 Message-ID: References: <4EBFE25E.3010101@gmail.com> <838vnkeybb.fsf@gnu.org> <4EC022EB.2030508@gmail.com> <8339drg4dy.fsf@gnu.org> <83y5vje4qh.fsf@gnu.org> Reply-To: Eli Zaretskii NNTP-Posting-Host: lo.gmane.org X-Trace: dough.gmane.org 1321277741 9309 80.91.229.12 (14 Nov 2011 13:35:41 GMT) X-Complaints-To: usenet@dough.gmane.org NNTP-Posting-Date: Mon, 14 Nov 2011 13:35:41 +0000 (UTC) Cc: cschol2112@googlemail.com, 10035@debbugs.gnu.org To: Juanma Barranquero Original-X-From: bug-gnu-emacs-bounces+geb-bug-gnu-emacs=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Mon Nov 14 14:35:37 2011 Return-path: Envelope-to: geb-bug-gnu-emacs@m.gmane.org Original-Received: from lists.gnu.org ([140.186.70.17]) by lo.gmane.org with esmtp (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1RPwhE-0005Xa-2i for geb-bug-gnu-emacs@m.gmane.org; Mon, 14 Nov 2011 14:35:36 +0100 Original-Received: from localhost ([::1]:37840 helo=lists.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1RPwhD-000607-Fm for geb-bug-gnu-emacs@m.gmane.org; Mon, 14 Nov 2011 08:35:35 -0500 Original-Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([140.186.70.92]:47992) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1RPwh8-0005zV-Df for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Mon, 14 Nov 2011 08:35:34 -0500 Original-Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1RPwh7-0005yz-0s for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Mon, 14 Nov 2011 08:35:30 -0500 Original-Received: from debbugs.gnu.org ([140.186.70.43]:47392) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1RPwh6-0005yu-St for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Mon, 14 Nov 2011 08:35:28 -0500 Original-Received: from Debian-debbugs by debbugs.gnu.org with local (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1RPwhe-0001wi-AN for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Mon, 14 Nov 2011 08:36:02 -0500 X-Loop: help-debbugs@gnu.org Resent-From: Eli Zaretskii Original-Sender: debbugs-submit-bounces@debbugs.gnu.org Resent-CC: bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org Resent-Date: Mon, 14 Nov 2011 13:36:02 +0000 Resent-Message-ID: Resent-Sender: help-debbugs@gnu.org X-GNU-PR-Message: followup 10035 X-GNU-PR-Package: emacs X-GNU-PR-Keywords: Original-Received: via spool by 10035-submit@debbugs.gnu.org id=B10035.13212777537465 (code B ref 10035); Mon, 14 Nov 2011 13:36:02 +0000 Original-Received: (at 10035) by debbugs.gnu.org; 14 Nov 2011 13:35:53 +0000 Original-Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1] helo=debbugs.gnu.org) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1RPwhV-0001wM-KM for submit@debbugs.gnu.org; Mon, 14 Nov 2011 08:35:53 -0500 Original-Received: from fencepost.gnu.org ([140.186.70.10] ident=Debian-exim) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1RPwhU-0001wG-Df for 10035@debbugs.gnu.org; Mon, 14 Nov 2011 08:35:52 -0500 Original-Received: from eliz by fencepost.gnu.org with local (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1RPwgw-00078P-3Y; Mon, 14 Nov 2011 08:35:18 -0500 In-reply-to: (message from Juanma Barranquero on Mon, 14 Nov 2011 12:44:04 +0100) X-BeenThere: debbugs-submit@debbugs.gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.11 Precedence: list Resent-Date: Mon, 14 Nov 2011 08:36:02 -0500 X-detected-operating-system: by eggs.gnu.org: GNU/Linux 2.6 (newer, 2) X-Received-From: 140.186.70.43 X-BeenThere: bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org List-Id: "Bug reports for GNU Emacs, the Swiss army knife of text editors" List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: bug-gnu-emacs-bounces+geb-bug-gnu-emacs=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Original-Sender: bug-gnu-emacs-bounces+geb-bug-gnu-emacs=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Xref: news.gmane.org gmane.emacs.bugs:53892 Archived-At: > From: Juanma Barranquero > Date: Mon, 14 Nov 2011 12:44:04 +0100 > Cc: cschol2112@googlemail.com, 10035@debbugs.gnu.org > > (gdb) p a->hash > $3 = 202770841 > (gdb) p b->hash > $4 = 202770841 Hmm... identical, but both wrong. Do you get these same values every time you reproduce the assertion violation, or are the hashes different each time?