From: Eli Zaretskii <eliz@gnu.org>
To: Stefan Monnier <monnier@IRO.UMontreal.CA>
Cc: 9891@debbugs.gnu.org
Subject: bug#9891: 24.0.90; Duplicated entry at the info directory
Date: Wed, 02 Nov 2011 09:03:03 -0400 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <E1RLaT9-0006gN-Qe@fencepost.gnu.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <jwvobwuhf5n.fsf-monnier+emacs@gnu.org> (message from Stefan Monnier on Wed, 02 Nov 2011 08:41:58 -0400)
> From: Stefan Monnier <monnier@IRO.UMontreal.CA>
> Cc: Juri Linkov <juri@jurta.org>, 9891@debbugs.gnu.org
> Date: Wed, 02 Nov 2011 08:41:58 -0400
>
> I'm not sure what is being discussed. Is it that the two above lines
> are kept, or that one of the two is removed as a duplicate?
That it is removed.
> And why is the other behavior better?
Because these are 2 different glibc functions.
> Stefan "To my layman's eyes, the two lines are equivalent, just
> like "* GDB: (gdb)" and "* Gdb: (gdb)" and should be
> collapsed into one"
Evidently, this is not always true. Leaving redundant information is
a lesser evil than removing non-redundant one, IMO.
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2011-11-02 13:03 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 29+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2011-10-27 19:15 bug#9891: 24.0.90; Duplicated entry at the info directory Dani Moncayo
2011-10-28 16:38 ` Glenn Morris
2011-10-28 17:39 ` Dani Moncayo
2011-10-29 18:23 ` Glenn Morris
2011-10-29 18:55 ` Dani Moncayo
2011-10-29 19:16 ` Dani Moncayo
2011-10-29 20:41 ` Dani Moncayo
2011-10-31 18:57 ` Eli Zaretskii
2011-10-29 20:59 ` Eli Zaretskii
2011-10-29 21:19 ` Dani Moncayo
2011-10-31 18:53 ` Eli Zaretskii
2011-10-31 18:49 ` Eli Zaretskii
2011-11-01 9:29 ` Juri Linkov
2011-11-01 11:32 ` Eli Zaretskii
2011-11-01 22:31 ` Juri Linkov
2011-11-02 1:39 ` Stefan Monnier
2011-11-02 10:01 ` Juri Linkov
2011-11-02 3:55 ` Eli Zaretskii
2011-11-02 10:07 ` Juri Linkov
2011-11-02 10:57 ` Eli Zaretskii
2011-11-02 12:41 ` Stefan Monnier
2011-11-02 13:03 ` Eli Zaretskii [this message]
2011-11-02 14:05 ` Stefan Monnier
2011-11-02 14:33 ` Drew Adams
2011-11-02 17:28 ` Andreas Schwab
2011-11-02 17:54 ` Eli Zaretskii
2011-11-02 19:52 ` Stefan Monnier
2011-11-05 13:54 ` Eli Zaretskii
2022-04-26 13:17 ` Lars Ingebrigtsen
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
List information: https://www.gnu.org/software/emacs/
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=E1RLaT9-0006gN-Qe@fencepost.gnu.org \
--to=eliz@gnu.org \
--cc=9891@debbugs.gnu.org \
--cc=monnier@IRO.UMontreal.CA \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
Code repositories for project(s) associated with this public inbox
https://git.savannah.gnu.org/cgit/emacs.git
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for read-only IMAP folder(s) and NNTP newsgroup(s).