From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Path: news.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: Richard Stallman Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.bugs Subject: bug#9766: 24.0.50; rmail-forward makes attachment that doesn't read right Date: Tue, 18 Oct 2011 06:56:50 -0400 Message-ID: References: <83vcrnufjg.fsf@gnu.org> Reply-To: rms@gnu.org NNTP-Posting-Host: lo.gmane.org Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-15 X-Trace: dough.gmane.org 1318935444 19617 80.91.229.12 (18 Oct 2011 10:57:24 GMT) X-Complaints-To: usenet@dough.gmane.org NNTP-Posting-Date: Tue, 18 Oct 2011 10:57:24 +0000 (UTC) Cc: 9766@debbugs.gnu.org To: Eli Zaretskii Original-X-From: bug-gnu-emacs-bounces+geb-bug-gnu-emacs=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Tue Oct 18 12:57:19 2011 Return-path: Envelope-to: geb-bug-gnu-emacs@m.gmane.org Original-Received: from lists.gnu.org ([140.186.70.17]) by lo.gmane.org with esmtp (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1RG7MF-0004xw-Ek for geb-bug-gnu-emacs@m.gmane.org; Tue, 18 Oct 2011 12:57:19 +0200 Original-Received: from localhost ([::1]:43769 helo=lists.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1RG7MF-0000gH-3U for geb-bug-gnu-emacs@m.gmane.org; Tue, 18 Oct 2011 06:57:19 -0400 Original-Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([140.186.70.92]:53718) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1RG7M9-0000fy-1Y for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Tue, 18 Oct 2011 06:57:17 -0400 Original-Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1RG7M2-0004uy-08 for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Tue, 18 Oct 2011 06:57:12 -0400 Original-Received: from debbugs.gnu.org ([140.186.70.43]:54867) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1RG7M1-0004us-S7 for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Tue, 18 Oct 2011 06:57:05 -0400 Original-Received: from Debian-debbugs by debbugs.gnu.org with local (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1RG7Mv-0001E2-PT for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Tue, 18 Oct 2011 06:58:02 -0400 X-Loop: help-debbugs@gnu.org Resent-From: Richard Stallman Original-Sender: debbugs-submit-bounces@debbugs.gnu.org Resent-CC: bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org Resent-Date: Tue, 18 Oct 2011 10:58:01 +0000 Resent-Message-ID: Resent-Sender: help-debbugs@gnu.org X-GNU-PR-Message: followup 9766 X-GNU-PR-Package: emacs X-GNU-PR-Keywords: Original-Received: via spool by 9766-submit@debbugs.gnu.org id=B9766.13189354714694 (code B ref 9766); Tue, 18 Oct 2011 10:58:01 +0000 Original-Received: (at 9766) by debbugs.gnu.org; 18 Oct 2011 10:57:51 +0000 Original-Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1] helo=debbugs.gnu.org) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1RG7Mk-0001De-EU for submit@debbugs.gnu.org; Tue, 18 Oct 2011 06:57:50 -0400 Original-Received: from fencepost.gnu.org ([140.186.70.10] ident=Debian-exim) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1RG7Mi-0001DX-KZ for 9766@debbugs.gnu.org; Tue, 18 Oct 2011 06:57:49 -0400 Original-Received: from rms by fencepost.gnu.org with local (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1RG7Lm-00073c-JO; Tue, 18 Oct 2011 06:56:50 -0400 In-reply-to: <83vcrnufjg.fsf@gnu.org> (message from Eli Zaretskii on Tue, 18 Oct 2011 05:47:31 +0200) X-BeenThere: debbugs-submit@debbugs.gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.11 Precedence: list Resent-Date: Tue, 18 Oct 2011 06:58:01 -0400 X-detected-operating-system: by eggs.gnu.org: GNU/Linux 2.6 (newer, 2) X-Received-From: 140.186.70.43 X-BeenThere: bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org List-Id: "Bug reports for GNU Emacs, the Swiss army knife of text editors" List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: bug-gnu-emacs-bounces+geb-bug-gnu-emacs=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Original-Sender: bug-gnu-emacs-bounces+geb-bug-gnu-emacs=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Xref: news.gmane.org gmane.emacs.bugs:52780 Archived-At: > For the definitive answer, I suggest to start Emacs with the default > value of mail-user-agent, start Rmail, forward (to yourself) a message > with attachments, and then look at hoe message.el did it. > > But that is not conclusive. Why not? Last time I tried it, the result was correctly displayed by Rmail. If the message displays badly in mail reader A, debugging that might lead to some problem in how the message was written. But if the message displays with no problem in mail reader A, that doesn't tell us much about what it is about the message that causes mail reader B to display it badly. -- Dr Richard Stallman President, Free Software Foundation 51 Franklin St Boston MA 02110 USA www.fsf.org www.gnu.org Skype: No way! That's nonfree (freedom-denying) software. Use free telephony http://directory.fsf.org/category/tel/