From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Path: news.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: Eli Zaretskii Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.bugs Subject: bug#9772: , USE_LSB_TAG, and MSVC Date: Mon, 17 Oct 2011 10:02:59 -0400 Message-ID: References: <4E9B9FEF.7020207@cs.ucla.edu> Reply-To: Eli Zaretskii NNTP-Posting-Host: lo.gmane.org X-Trace: dough.gmane.org 1318862669 23390 80.91.229.12 (17 Oct 2011 14:44:29 GMT) X-Complaints-To: usenet@dough.gmane.org NNTP-Posting-Date: Mon, 17 Oct 2011 14:44:29 +0000 (UTC) Cc: eggert@cs.ucla.edu, 9772@debbugs.gnu.org To: Stefan Monnier Original-X-From: bug-gnu-emacs-bounces+geb-bug-gnu-emacs=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Mon Oct 17 16:44:24 2011 Return-path: Envelope-to: geb-bug-gnu-emacs@m.gmane.org Original-Received: from lists.gnu.org ([140.186.70.17]) by lo.gmane.org with esmtp (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1RFoQR-0005GF-QZ for geb-bug-gnu-emacs@m.gmane.org; Mon, 17 Oct 2011 16:44:23 +0200 Original-Received: from localhost ([::1]:33613 helo=lists.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1RFnnz-0005cX-Fs for geb-bug-gnu-emacs@m.gmane.org; Mon, 17 Oct 2011 10:04:39 -0400 Original-Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([140.186.70.92]:53948) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1RFnmp-00034W-Ny for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Mon, 17 Oct 2011 10:03:35 -0400 Original-Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1RFnmZ-0003AI-17 for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Mon, 17 Oct 2011 10:03:21 -0400 Original-Received: from debbugs.gnu.org ([140.186.70.43]:39632) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1RFnmY-00039w-Rt for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Mon, 17 Oct 2011 10:03:10 -0400 Original-Received: from Debian-debbugs by debbugs.gnu.org with local (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1RFnnO-00012w-07 for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Mon, 17 Oct 2011 10:04:02 -0400 X-Loop: help-debbugs@gnu.org Resent-From: Eli Zaretskii Original-Sender: debbugs-submit-bounces@debbugs.gnu.org Resent-CC: bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org Resent-Date: Mon, 17 Oct 2011 14:04:01 +0000 Resent-Message-ID: Resent-Sender: help-debbugs@gnu.org X-GNU-PR-Message: followup 9772 X-GNU-PR-Package: emacs X-GNU-PR-Keywords: patch Original-Received: via spool by 9772-submit@debbugs.gnu.org id=B9772.13188602354007 (code B ref 9772); Mon, 17 Oct 2011 14:04:01 +0000 Original-Received: (at 9772) by debbugs.gnu.org; 17 Oct 2011 14:03:55 +0000 Original-Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1] helo=debbugs.gnu.org) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1RFnnF-00012Y-Rr for submit@debbugs.gnu.org; Mon, 17 Oct 2011 10:03:55 -0400 Original-Received: from fencepost.gnu.org ([140.186.70.10]) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1RFnnD-00012P-Ie for 9772@debbugs.gnu.org; Mon, 17 Oct 2011 10:03:52 -0400 Original-Received: from eliz by fencepost.gnu.org with local (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1RFnmN-0006Ez-S0; Mon, 17 Oct 2011 10:02:59 -0400 In-reply-to: (message from Stefan Monnier on Mon, 17 Oct 2011 09:22:44 -0400) X-BeenThere: debbugs-submit@debbugs.gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.11 Precedence: list Resent-Date: Mon, 17 Oct 2011 10:04:02 -0400 X-detected-operating-system: by eggs.gnu.org: GNU/Linux 2.6 (newer, 2) X-Received-From: 140.186.70.43 X-BeenThere: bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org List-Id: "Bug reports for GNU Emacs, the Swiss army knife of text editors" List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: bug-gnu-emacs-bounces+geb-bug-gnu-emacs=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Original-Sender: bug-gnu-emacs-bounces+geb-bug-gnu-emacs=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Xref: news.gmane.org gmane.emacs.bugs:52718 Archived-At: > From: Stefan Monnier > Date: Mon, 17 Oct 2011 09:22:44 -0400 > Cc: 9772@debbugs.gnu.org > > > Here's a patch to the Emacs trunk (bzr 106094) to cause it to use > > if available, falling back on a Gnulib replacement > > otherwise. This simplifies Emacs proper, and should future-proof it > > for C1X compilers. > > I like this change Agreed. If my response sounded as if I didn't like it, I'm sorry for the confusion. > but I hope we can postpone it to after Emacs-24.1. If the only reason is to make the Windows and DOS ports cleaner, then I'd definitely suggest to postpone.