unofficial mirror of bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org 
 help / color / mirror / code / Atom feed
From: Eli Zaretskii <eliz@gnu.org>
To: rms@gnu.org
Cc: 9598@debbugs.gnu.org
Subject: bug#9598: 24.0.50; completion goes too far
Date: Mon, 26 Sep 2011 02:09:41 -0400	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <E1R84Np-0006Gq-PK@fencepost.gnu.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <E1R7zYa-0004No-FH@fencepost.gnu.org> (message from Richard Stallman on Sun, 25 Sep 2011 21:00:28 -0400)

> Date: Sun, 25 Sep 2011 21:00:28 -0400
> From: Richard Stallman <rms@gnu.org>
> Cc: 9598@debbugs.gnu.org
> Reply-To: rms@gnu.org
> 
>     And we have been over this before[*].  People, including you, have pointed out
>     the user-oriented problems with this UI design, but Stefan really wants it this
>     way.  So you and other users will continue to be surprised.
> 
> I think we should poll the users about this question.  That way we can
> resolve the disagreement based on something more objective.

I find arguments about defaults a waste of time.  So I think instead
of arguing and polling, we should just make sure there's a completion
style that closely resembles what you want, i.e. candidates are found
by matching their beginning with what the user typed.  Currently, I
find no such style in what minibuffer.el offers, or maybe there's a
bug (see my other mail for bug #9591).

(Btw, why do we have 2 separate bug reports about the same issue?)

>     IOW, let users choose at completion time which completion style(s) to use, on
>     demand.  Each time they change methods they can complete anew and find out
>     whether there are matches using that method.
> 
> This might be too complicated an interface to be good to use.

I agree.





  parent reply	other threads:[~2011-09-26  6:09 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 18+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2011-09-25 17:34 bug#9598: 24.0.50; completion goes too far Richard Stallman
2011-09-25 18:47 ` Drew Adams
2011-09-26  1:00   ` Richard Stallman
2011-09-26  1:53     ` Drew Adams
2011-09-26  6:09     ` Eli Zaretskii [this message]
2011-09-26 10:42       ` Richard Stallman
2011-09-26 11:34         ` Eli Zaretskii
2011-09-26 21:12           ` Richard Stallman
2022-02-06  0:05             ` bug#12916: 24.2; Completion for "C-x b" does not include current buffer Lars Ingebrigtsen
2011-09-26  2:45 ` bug#9598: 24.0.50; completion goes too far Stefan Monnier
2011-09-26 10:42   ` Richard Stallman
2011-09-27  2:25     ` Stefan Monnier
2011-09-27 16:34       ` Richard Stallman
2011-10-11  2:52         ` Stefan Monnier
2011-10-11 22:01           ` Richard Stallman
2016-01-31 14:30 ` bug#9598: Status: C-x b completion should also display current buffer Marcin Borkowski
2016-01-31 16:18   ` bug#12916: " Drew Adams
2016-01-31 16:56   ` Eli Zaretskii

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

  List information: https://www.gnu.org/software/emacs/

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=E1R84Np-0006Gq-PK@fencepost.gnu.org \
    --to=eliz@gnu.org \
    --cc=9598@debbugs.gnu.org \
    --cc=rms@gnu.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
Code repositories for project(s) associated with this public inbox

	https://git.savannah.gnu.org/cgit/emacs.git

This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for read-only IMAP folder(s) and NNTP newsgroup(s).