From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Path: news.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: Eli Zaretskii Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.bugs Subject: bug#9480: 24.0.50; (vc-git) stash@{n} - requires shell quoting? Date: Tue, 13 Sep 2011 02:54:07 -0400 Message-ID: References: <81sjo2fd8o.fsf@gmail.com> <81d3f6t9jn.fsf@gmail.com> <81y5xt3r1f.fsf@gmail.com> Reply-To: Eli Zaretskii NNTP-Posting-Host: lo.gmane.org X-Trace: dough.gmane.org 1315896887 31683 80.91.229.12 (13 Sep 2011 06:54:47 GMT) X-Complaints-To: usenet@dough.gmane.org NNTP-Posting-Date: Tue, 13 Sep 2011 06:54:47 +0000 (UTC) Cc: 9480@debbugs.gnu.org To: Jambunathan K Original-X-From: bug-gnu-emacs-bounces+geb-bug-gnu-emacs=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Tue Sep 13 08:54:43 2011 Return-path: Envelope-to: geb-bug-gnu-emacs@m.gmane.org Original-Received: from lists.gnu.org ([140.186.70.17]) by lo.gmane.org with esmtp (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1R3MtG-0004YP-Rn for geb-bug-gnu-emacs@m.gmane.org; Tue, 13 Sep 2011 08:54:42 +0200 Original-Received: from localhost ([::1]:51781 helo=lists.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1R3MtG-00032L-Hg for geb-bug-gnu-emacs@m.gmane.org; Tue, 13 Sep 2011 02:54:42 -0400 Original-Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([140.186.70.92]:56106) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1R3MtC-00031p-JK for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Tue, 13 Sep 2011 02:54:39 -0400 Original-Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1R3MtB-0002b5-Gq for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Tue, 13 Sep 2011 02:54:38 -0400 Original-Received: from debbugs.gnu.org ([140.186.70.43]:36634) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1R3MtB-0002b1-BK for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Tue, 13 Sep 2011 02:54:37 -0400 Original-Received: from Debian-debbugs by debbugs.gnu.org with local (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1R3MxS-0002GP-CV; Tue, 13 Sep 2011 02:59:02 -0400 X-Loop: help-debbugs@gnu.org Resent-From: Eli Zaretskii Original-Sender: debbugs-submit-bounces@debbugs.gnu.org Resent-To: owner@debbugs.gnu.org Resent-CC: bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org Resent-Date: Tue, 13 Sep 2011 06:59:02 +0000 Resent-Message-ID: Resent-Sender: help-debbugs@gnu.org X-GNU-PR-Message: followup 9480 X-GNU-PR-Package: emacs X-GNU-PR-Keywords: Original-Received: via spool by 9480-submit@debbugs.gnu.org id=B9480.13158971198672 (code B ref 9480); Tue, 13 Sep 2011 06:59:02 +0000 Original-Received: (at 9480) by debbugs.gnu.org; 13 Sep 2011 06:58:39 +0000 Original-Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1] helo=debbugs.gnu.org) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1R3Mx2-0002Fn-PB for submit@debbugs.gnu.org; Tue, 13 Sep 2011 02:58:38 -0400 Original-Received: from fencepost.gnu.org ([140.186.70.10]) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1R3Mwz-0002Ff-FG for 9480@debbugs.gnu.org; Tue, 13 Sep 2011 02:58:34 -0400 Original-Received: from eliz by fencepost.gnu.org with local (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1R3Msh-0008Dy-AQ; Tue, 13 Sep 2011 02:54:07 -0400 In-reply-to: <81y5xt3r1f.fsf@gmail.com> (message from Jambunathan K on Tue, 13 Sep 2011 11:47:00 +0530) X-BeenThere: debbugs-submit@debbugs.gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.11 Precedence: list Resent-Date: Tue, 13 Sep 2011 02:59:02 -0400 X-detected-operating-system: by eggs.gnu.org: GNU/Linux 2.6 (newer, 1) X-Received-From: 140.186.70.43 X-BeenThere: bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org List-Id: "Bug reports for GNU Emacs, the Swiss army knife of text editors" List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: bug-gnu-emacs-bounces+geb-bug-gnu-emacs=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Original-Sender: bug-gnu-emacs-bounces+geb-bug-gnu-emacs=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Xref: news.gmane.org gmane.emacs.bugs:51090 Archived-At: > From: Jambunathan K > Cc: Glenn Morris , 9480@debbugs.gnu.org > Date: Tue, 13 Sep 2011 11:47:00 +0530 > > > So it's a mystery why this happens with the Cygwin Bash. Jambunathan, > > could you perhaps post a question to the Cygwin mailing list? > > (setenv "CYGWIN" "noglob") > > solves the reported problem. > > I was led to try the above option based on the below post which is > fairly recent: http://sourceware.org/ml/cygwin/2011-07/msg00218.html Thanks. This unlocks the mystery. I think we can now close the bug report, do you agree? Perhaps etc/PROBLEMS should advise Cygwin users to set CYGWIN=noglob (as I understand the default is CYGWIN=glob). I still don't understand why GLOB_BRACE causes "{0}" be expanded -- that sounds like a bug in the implementation of `glob' used by Cygwin, no? Perhaps a Cygwin bug report is in order.