From: Eli Zaretskii <eliz@gnu.org>
To: Stefan Monnier <monnier@iro.umontreal.ca>
Cc: 9221@debbugs.gnu.org
Subject: bug#9221: Memory leak
Date: Tue, 02 Aug 2011 00:39:10 -0400 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <E1Qo6l4-0003Xx-Jd@fencepost.gnu.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <jwvtya0pn55.fsf@iro.umontreal.ca> (message from Stefan Monnier on Mon, 01 Aug 2011 22:23:18 -0400)
> From: Stefan Monnier <monnier@iro.umontreal.ca>
> Date: Mon, 01 Aug 2011 22:23:18 -0400
>
> I'm seeing some weird behavior linked to insane memory consumption.
> E.g. my Gnus session tends to grow to more than 2GB and then become
> unusage and unkillable (or close enough: in D state, "kill -9" isn't
> enough to make it stop use CPU, tho I guess that CPU use is really due
> to something like the OS being in the process of dumping the core file,
> tho I don't see any left over core files).
Does anyone else see similar memory footprint growth?
> I did manage to attach to it and get a few backtraces (with
> a breakpoint on mmap) before it was too late, and bidi_shelve_cache
> showed up in most of the backtraces (like 5 out of 8, maybe): not
> a strong indictment, but at least a lead worth following until I get
> more data.
bidi_shelve_cache is used extensively during redisplay, and it does
allocate memory (which should be almost immediately freed by its
companion bidi_unshelve_cache, or by an explicit xfree call in a few
places). So the fact that you saw it on the callstack of a breakpoint
in mmap is what I'd expect, not really an evidence of a leak. To see
if the leak is really due to bidi, run a session with
bidi-display-reordering turned off, and see if there's any change.
Although, AFAIR, some calls to bidi_shelve_cache are not conditioned
on bidi.
FWIW, I'm running a session continuously for several days since the
last rebuild, and don't see any unusual footprint, let alone one that
grows without limits. But that's a with a code base that is slightly
different from the trunk, and I don't use Gnus, so perhaps some change
done lately (including in bidi.c) is responsible. What trunk revision
are you running.
If we cannot exclude bidi_shelve_cache from the list of suspects, I
could add debugging code that monitored its allocations and
deallocations. That would allow us to see if there's non-zero
balance.
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2011-08-02 4:39 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 12+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2011-08-02 2:23 bug#9221: Memory leak Stefan Monnier
2011-08-02 4:39 ` Eli Zaretskii [this message]
2011-08-02 11:17 ` Antoine Levitt
2011-08-02 11:37 ` Eli Zaretskii
2011-08-02 12:18 ` Antoine Levitt
2011-08-02 23:53 ` Andy Moreton
2011-08-03 3:03 ` Eli Zaretskii
2011-08-03 9:04 ` Andy Moreton
2011-08-03 14:06 ` Andy Moreton
2011-08-04 22:14 ` Andy Moreton
2011-08-04 22:33 ` Antoine Levitt
2011-08-05 11:16 ` Eli Zaretskii
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
List information: https://www.gnu.org/software/emacs/
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=E1Qo6l4-0003Xx-Jd@fencepost.gnu.org \
--to=eliz@gnu.org \
--cc=9221@debbugs.gnu.org \
--cc=monnier@iro.umontreal.ca \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
Code repositories for project(s) associated with this public inbox
https://git.savannah.gnu.org/cgit/emacs.git
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for read-only IMAP folder(s) and NNTP newsgroup(s).