From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Path: news.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: Eli Zaretskii Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.bugs Subject: bug#8159: file-name-sans-version fails for some git files Date: Thu, 03 Mar 2011 08:57:25 -0500 Message-ID: References: <83zkpcx3ch.fsf@gnu.org> Reply-To: Eli Zaretskii NNTP-Posting-Host: lo.gmane.org Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=iso-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit X-Trace: dough.gmane.org 1299164430 10368 80.91.229.12 (3 Mar 2011 15:00:30 GMT) X-Complaints-To: usenet@dough.gmane.org NNTP-Posting-Date: Thu, 3 Mar 2011 15:00:30 +0000 (UTC) Cc: 8159@debbugs.gnu.org To: Reuben Thomas Original-X-From: bug-gnu-emacs-bounces+geb-bug-gnu-emacs=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Thu Mar 03 16:00:26 2011 Return-path: Envelope-to: geb-bug-gnu-emacs@m.gmane.org Original-Received: from lists.gnu.org ([199.232.76.165]) by lo.gmane.org with esmtp (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1PvA0v-0006ah-FX for geb-bug-gnu-emacs@m.gmane.org; Thu, 03 Mar 2011 16:00:25 +0100 Original-Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1]:60175 helo=lists.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1PvA0u-0004Wd-R1 for geb-bug-gnu-emacs@m.gmane.org; Thu, 03 Mar 2011 10:00:24 -0500 Original-Received: from [140.186.70.92] (port=60662 helo=eggs.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1PvA0f-0004Sp-OV for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Thu, 03 Mar 2011 10:00:14 -0500 Original-Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1PvA0a-0000Xr-V6 for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Thu, 03 Mar 2011 10:00:09 -0500 Original-Received: from debbugs.gnu.org ([140.186.70.43]:34970) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1Pv9B3-0006Hm-JR for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Thu, 03 Mar 2011 09:06:49 -0500 Original-Received: from Debian-debbugs by debbugs.gnu.org with local (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1Pv92Y-00027w-4c; Thu, 03 Mar 2011 08:58:02 -0500 X-Loop: help-debbugs@gnu.org Resent-From: Eli Zaretskii Original-Sender: debbugs-submit-bounces@debbugs.gnu.org Resent-To: owner@debbugs.gnu.org Resent-CC: bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org Resent-Date: Thu, 03 Mar 2011 13:58:02 +0000 Resent-Message-ID: Resent-Sender: help-debbugs@gnu.org X-GNU-PR-Message: followup 8159 X-GNU-PR-Package: emacs X-GNU-PR-Keywords: Original-Received: via spool by 8159-submit@debbugs.gnu.org id=B8159.12991606538134 (code B ref 8159); Thu, 03 Mar 2011 13:58:02 +0000 Original-Received: (at 8159) by debbugs.gnu.org; 3 Mar 2011 13:57:33 +0000 Original-Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1] helo=debbugs.gnu.org) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1Pv925-000278-4w for submit@debbugs.gnu.org; Thu, 03 Mar 2011 08:57:33 -0500 Original-Received: from fencepost.gnu.org ([140.186.70.10]) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1Pv923-00026y-SU for 8159@debbugs.gnu.org; Thu, 03 Mar 2011 08:57:32 -0500 Original-Received: from eliz by fencepost.gnu.org with local (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1Pv91x-0007zE-PA; Thu, 03 Mar 2011 08:57:25 -0500 In-reply-to: (message from Reuben Thomas on Thu, 3 Mar 2011 13:39:32 +0000) X-BeenThere: debbugs-submit@debbugs.gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.11 Precedence: list Resent-Date: Thu, 03 Mar 2011 08:58:02 -0500 X-detected-operating-system: by eggs.gnu.org: GNU/Linux 2.6 (newer, 3) X-Received-From: 140.186.70.43 X-BeenThere: bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org List-Id: "Bug reports for GNU Emacs, the Swiss army knife of text editors" List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Original-Sender: bug-gnu-emacs-bounces+geb-bug-gnu-emacs=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Errors-To: bug-gnu-emacs-bounces+geb-bug-gnu-emacs=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Xref: news.gmane.org gmane.emacs.bugs:44574 Archived-At: > Date: Thu, 3 Mar 2011 13:39:32 +0000 > From: Reuben Thomas > Cc: 8159@debbugs.gnu.org > > On 3 March 2011 13:36, Eli Zaretskii wrote: > > > > If you are okay with having foo.js~ as a simple backup file name of > > foo.js.~HEAD~1~ and foo.js.~3~ as its numbered backup, then I see no > > issues here.  I just wonder if that would surprise git users (I don't > > use it too much, so I don't know). > > Why would you have a backup of such a file? Because vc-make-backup-files is set non-nil? > It's a file visited with > vc-revision-other-window, which is by default read-only. Is that the only way to visit files with such names? Anyway, your change is not limited to this particular situation, it is more general. It will affect any file of that form, anywhere.