From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Path: news.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: Eli Zaretskii Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.bugs Subject: bug#7503: copy-and-insert-previous-line Date: Sun, 28 Nov 2010 10:44:57 -0500 Message-ID: References: <4CF22EA9.3020207@inducks.org> <4CF2636C.6030105@gmx.at> <4CF26F7D.5020705@gmx.at> Reply-To: Eli Zaretskii NNTP-Posting-Host: lo.gmane.org X-Trace: dough.gmane.org 1290960911 27375 80.91.229.12 (28 Nov 2010 16:15:11 GMT) X-Complaints-To: usenet@dough.gmane.org NNTP-Posting-Date: Sun, 28 Nov 2010 16:15:11 +0000 (UTC) Cc: schwab@linux-m68k.org, mje@inducks.org, 7503@debbugs.gnu.org To: martin rudalics Original-X-From: bug-gnu-emacs-bounces+geb-bug-gnu-emacs=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Sun Nov 28 17:15:03 2010 Return-path: Envelope-to: geb-bug-gnu-emacs@m.gmane.org Original-Received: from lists.gnu.org ([199.232.76.165]) by lo.gmane.org with esmtp (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1PMju3-00078j-Pp for geb-bug-gnu-emacs@m.gmane.org; Sun, 28 Nov 2010 17:15:03 +0100 Original-Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1]:50244 helo=lists.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1PMju3-0006nj-5O for geb-bug-gnu-emacs@m.gmane.org; Sun, 28 Nov 2010 11:15:03 -0500 Original-Received: from [140.186.70.92] (port=44127 helo=eggs.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1PMjtw-0006n0-9p for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Sun, 28 Nov 2010 11:14:57 -0500 Original-Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1PMjtv-0002ov-1s for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Sun, 28 Nov 2010 11:14:56 -0500 Original-Received: from debbugs.gnu.org ([140.186.70.43]:55068) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1PMjtv-0002or-0I for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Sun, 28 Nov 2010 11:14:55 -0500 Original-Received: from Debian-debbugs by debbugs.gnu.org with local (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1PMjMA-0000ao-Tz; Sun, 28 Nov 2010 10:40:02 -0500 X-Loop: help-debbugs@gnu.org Resent-From: Eli Zaretskii Original-Sender: debbugs-submit-bounces@debbugs.gnu.org Resent-To: owner@debbugs.gnu.org Resent-CC: bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org Resent-Date: Sun, 28 Nov 2010 15:40:02 +0000 Resent-Message-ID: Resent-Sender: help-debbugs@gnu.org X-GNU-PR-Message: followup 7503 X-GNU-PR-Package: emacs X-GNU-PR-Keywords: Original-Received: via spool by 7503-submit@debbugs.gnu.org id=B7503.12909587712237 (code B ref 7503); Sun, 28 Nov 2010 15:40:02 +0000 Original-Received: (at 7503) by debbugs.gnu.org; 28 Nov 2010 15:39:31 +0000 Original-Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1] helo=debbugs.gnu.org) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1PMjLf-0000a2-LH for submit@debbugs.gnu.org; Sun, 28 Nov 2010 10:39:31 -0500 Original-Received: from fencepost.gnu.org ([140.186.70.10]) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1PMjLd-0000Zq-HD for 7503@debbugs.gnu.org; Sun, 28 Nov 2010 10:39:29 -0500 Original-Received: from eliz by fencepost.gnu.org with local (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1PMjQv-0000mu-UZ; Sun, 28 Nov 2010 10:44:57 -0500 In-reply-to: <4CF26F7D.5020705@gmx.at> (message from martin rudalics on Sun, 28 Nov 2010 16:04:29 +0100) X-BeenThere: debbugs-submit@debbugs.gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.11 Precedence: list Resent-Date: Sun, 28 Nov 2010 10:40:02 -0500 X-detected-operating-system: by eggs.gnu.org: GNU/Linux 2.6 (newer, 3) X-BeenThere: bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org List-Id: "Bug reports for GNU Emacs, the Swiss army knife of text editors" List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Original-Sender: bug-gnu-emacs-bounces+geb-bug-gnu-emacs=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Errors-To: bug-gnu-emacs-bounces+geb-bug-gnu-emacs=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Xref: news.gmane.org gmane.emacs.bugs:41965 Archived-At: > Date: Sun, 28 Nov 2010 16:04:29 +0100 > From: martin rudalics > CC: schwab@linux-m68k.org, mje@inducks.org, 7503@debbugs.gnu.org > > >>> What's wrong with line-beginning-position and line-end-position? > >> Field boundaries? > > > > "To ignore field boundaries bind `inhibit-field-text-motion' to t." > > Sure. But why bother? Because it's a useful level of abstraction?