* bug#3146:
@ 2009-05-31 5:54 Adrian Robert
2009-05-31 15:14 ` bug#3146: Stefan Monnier
0 siblings, 1 reply; 7+ messages in thread
From: Adrian Robert @ 2009-05-31 5:54 UTC (permalink / raw
To: 3146; +Cc: David Reitter
I vote for getting rid of it due to the duplication, and the fact
that people either don't know about it or don't like it. Also if it
would require handling Leopard and Tiger (which is still a viable,
heavily used OS) separately, that is a pain.
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 7+ messages in thread
* bug#3146:
2009-05-31 5:54 bug#3146: Adrian Robert
@ 2009-05-31 15:14 ` Stefan Monnier
2009-06-01 14:59 ` bug#3146: Eli Zaretskii
2009-06-08 8:21 ` bug#3146: Adrian Robert
0 siblings, 2 replies; 7+ messages in thread
From: Stefan Monnier @ 2009-05-31 15:14 UTC (permalink / raw
To: Adrian Robert; +Cc: David Reitter, 3146
> I vote for getting rid of it due to the duplication, and the fact that
> people either don't know about it or don't like it. Also if it would
> require handling Leopard and Tiger (which is still a viable, heavily used
> OS) separately, that is a pain.
Getting rid of code specific to proprietary platforms always sounds good
to me,
Stefan
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 7+ messages in thread
* bug#3146:
2009-05-31 15:14 ` bug#3146: Stefan Monnier
@ 2009-06-01 14:59 ` Eli Zaretskii
2009-06-02 10:06 ` bug#3146: Adrian Robert
2009-06-08 8:21 ` bug#3146: Adrian Robert
1 sibling, 1 reply; 7+ messages in thread
From: Eli Zaretskii @ 2009-06-01 14:59 UTC (permalink / raw
To: Stefan Monnier, 3146; +Cc: david.reitter, adrian.b.robert
Who or what truncated the rest of the Subject line for this bug
report?
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 7+ messages in thread
* bug#3146:
2009-06-01 14:59 ` bug#3146: Eli Zaretskii
@ 2009-06-02 10:06 ` Adrian Robert
2009-06-02 16:09 ` bug#3146: Eli Zaretskii
0 siblings, 1 reply; 7+ messages in thread
From: Adrian Robert @ 2009-06-02 10:06 UTC (permalink / raw
To: Eli Zaretskii; +Cc: 3146
On Jun 1, 2009, at 9:59 PM, Eli Zaretskii wrote:
> Who or what truncated the rest of the Subject line for this bug
> report?
If you hit "reply" on the web interface, it does not transfer the
subject automatically. I don't always remember to manually copy it.
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 7+ messages in thread
* bug#3146:
2009-06-02 10:06 ` bug#3146: Adrian Robert
@ 2009-06-02 16:09 ` Eli Zaretskii
0 siblings, 0 replies; 7+ messages in thread
From: Eli Zaretskii @ 2009-06-02 16:09 UTC (permalink / raw
To: Adrian Robert; +Cc: 3146
> Cc: 3146@emacsbugs.donarmstrong.com
> From: Adrian Robert <adrian.b.robert@gmail.com>
> Date: Tue, 2 Jun 2009 17:06:36 +0700
>
>
> On Jun 1, 2009, at 9:59 PM, Eli Zaretskii wrote:
>
> > Who or what truncated the rest of the Subject line for this bug
> > report?
>
> If you hit "reply" on the web interface, it does not transfer the
> subject automatically. I don't always remember to manually copy it.
Check the headers: it wasn't my mail to which I was responding.
I was asking who or what truncated the subject of this discussion
somewhere along the way. The subject is now unreadable by humans,
because it includes on the bug number, but not its description.
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 7+ messages in thread
* bug#3146:
2009-05-31 15:14 ` bug#3146: Stefan Monnier
2009-06-01 14:59 ` bug#3146: Eli Zaretskii
@ 2009-06-08 8:21 ` Adrian Robert
2009-06-08 15:42 ` bug#3146: Stefan Monnier
1 sibling, 1 reply; 7+ messages in thread
From: Adrian Robert @ 2009-06-08 8:21 UTC (permalink / raw
To: Stefan Monnier; +Cc: David Reitter, 3146
On May 31, 2009, at 10:14 PM, Stefan Monnier wrote:
>> I vote for getting rid of it due to the duplication, and the fact
>> that
>> people either don't know about it or don't like it. Also if it
>> would
>> require handling Leopard and Tiger (which is still a viable,
>> heavily used
>> OS) separately, that is a pain.
>
> Getting rid of code specific to proprietary platforms always sounds
> good
> to me,
Would this be OK for 23.1 or wait for 23.2? As David says there is
an alternative (also platform-specific) solution for the problem it
solves for users, and I don't believe many people use it anyway.
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 7+ messages in thread
* bug#3146:
2009-06-08 8:21 ` bug#3146: Adrian Robert
@ 2009-06-08 15:42 ` Stefan Monnier
0 siblings, 0 replies; 7+ messages in thread
From: Stefan Monnier @ 2009-06-08 15:42 UTC (permalink / raw
To: Adrian Robert; +Cc: David Reitter, 3146
> Would this be OK for 23.1 or wait for 23.2?
I think it's OK for 23.1.
Stefan
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 7+ messages in thread
end of thread, other threads:[~2009-06-08 15:42 UTC | newest]
Thread overview: 7+ messages (download: mbox.gz follow: Atom feed
-- links below jump to the message on this page --
2009-05-31 5:54 bug#3146: Adrian Robert
2009-05-31 15:14 ` bug#3146: Stefan Monnier
2009-06-01 14:59 ` bug#3146: Eli Zaretskii
2009-06-02 10:06 ` bug#3146: Adrian Robert
2009-06-02 16:09 ` bug#3146: Eli Zaretskii
2009-06-08 8:21 ` bug#3146: Adrian Robert
2009-06-08 15:42 ` bug#3146: Stefan Monnier
Code repositories for project(s) associated with this public inbox
https://git.savannah.gnu.org/cgit/emacs.git
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for read-only IMAP folder(s) and NNTP newsgroup(s).