From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Path: news.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: jpff Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.bugs Subject: bug#2161: This might explain it Date: Mon, 02 Feb 2009 13:15:16 +0000 Message-ID: Reply-To: jpff , 2161@emacsbugs.donarmstrong.com NNTP-Posting-Host: lo.gmane.org X-Trace: ger.gmane.org 1233581031 5713 80.91.229.12 (2 Feb 2009 13:23:51 GMT) X-Complaints-To: usenet@ger.gmane.org NNTP-Posting-Date: Mon, 2 Feb 2009 13:23:51 +0000 (UTC) To: 2161@emacsbugs.donarmstrong.com Original-X-From: bug-gnu-emacs-bounces+geb-bug-gnu-emacs=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Mon Feb 02 14:25:05 2009 Return-path: Envelope-to: geb-bug-gnu-emacs@m.gmane.org Original-Received: from lists.gnu.org ([199.232.76.165]) by lo.gmane.org with esmtp (Exim 4.50) id 1LTynL-0006ON-OY for geb-bug-gnu-emacs@m.gmane.org; Mon, 02 Feb 2009 14:25:00 +0100 Original-Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1]:51450 helo=lists.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1LTym3-0004nB-25 for geb-bug-gnu-emacs@m.gmane.org; Mon, 02 Feb 2009 08:23:39 -0500 Original-Received: from mailman by lists.gnu.org with tmda-scanned (Exim 4.43) id 1LTylz-0004n0-Fh for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Mon, 02 Feb 2009 08:23:35 -0500 Original-Received: from exim by lists.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.43) id 1LTylx-0004mg-N3 for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Mon, 02 Feb 2009 08:23:34 -0500 Original-Received: from [199.232.76.173] (port=33260 helo=monty-python.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1LTylx-0004mb-FJ for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Mon, 02 Feb 2009 08:23:33 -0500 Original-Received: from rzlab.ucr.edu ([138.23.92.77]:37970) by monty-python.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS-1.0:DHE_RSA_AES_256_CBC_SHA1:32) (Exim 4.60) (envelope-from ) id 1LTylx-0004uM-1r for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Mon, 02 Feb 2009 08:23:33 -0500 Original-Received: from rzlab.ucr.edu (rzlab.ucr.edu [127.0.0.1]) by rzlab.ucr.edu (8.13.8/8.13.8/Debian-3) with ESMTP id n12DNVYh009393; Mon, 2 Feb 2009 05:23:31 -0800 Original-Received: (from debbugs@localhost) by rzlab.ucr.edu (8.13.8/8.13.8/Submit) id n12DK4JW008310; Mon, 2 Feb 2009 05:20:04 -0800 X-Loop: owner@emacsbugs.donarmstrong.com Resent-From: jpff Original-Sender: jpff Resent-To: bug-submit-list@donarmstrong.com Resent-CC: Emacs Bugs Resent-Date: Mon, 02 Feb 2009 13:20:03 +0000 Resent-Message-ID: Resent-Sender: owner@emacsbugs.donarmstrong.com X-Emacs-PR-Message: followup 2161 X-Emacs-PR-Package: emacs X-Emacs-PR-Keywords: Original-Received: via spool by 2161-submit@emacsbugs.donarmstrong.com id=B2161.12335805228151 (code B ref 2161); Mon, 02 Feb 2009 13:20:03 +0000 Original-Received: (at 2161) by emacsbugs.donarmstrong.com; 2 Feb 2009 13:15:22 +0000 X-Spam-Bayes: score:0.5 Bayes not run. spammytokens:Tokens not available. hammytokens:Tokens not available. Original-Received: from codemist.co.uk (Debian-exim@west.codemist.co.uk [217.155.197.248] (may be forged)) by rzlab.ucr.edu (8.13.8/8.13.8/Debian-3) with ESMTP id n12DFHlJ008052 for <2161@emacsbugs.donarmstrong.com>; Mon, 2 Feb 2009 05:15:19 -0800 Original-Received: from cardew.codemist.co.uk ([172.16.4.17]) by codemist.co.uk with esmtp (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1LTydw-0002B4-Po for 2161@emacsbugs.donarmstrong.com; Mon, 02 Feb 2009 13:15:16 +0000 Original-Received: from jpff by cardew.codemist.co.uk with local (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1LTydw-0003gH-Fw for 2161@emacsbugs.donarmstrong.com; Mon, 02 Feb 2009 13:15:16 +0000 X-detected-operating-system: by monty-python.gnu.org: GNU/Linux 2.6 (newer, 3) Resent-Date: Mon, 02 Feb 2009 08:23:34 -0500 X-BeenThere: bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: "Bug reports for GNU Emacs, the Swiss army knife of text editors" List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Original-Sender: bug-gnu-emacs-bounces+geb-bug-gnu-emacs=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Errors-To: bug-gnu-emacs-bounces+geb-bug-gnu-emacs=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Xref: news.gmane.org gmane.emacs.bugs:24825 Archived-At: I have been single stepping the convertion for the last 2 hrs and it failed with Warning (undo): Buffer `RMAIL' undo info was 99232433 bytes long. The undo info was discarded because it exceeded `undo-outer-limit'. This is normal if you executed a command that made a huge change to the buffer. In that case, to prevent similar problems in the future, set `undo-outer-limit' to a value that is large enough to cover the maximum size of normal changes you expect a single command to make, but not so large that it might exceed the maximum memory allotted to Emacs. If you did not execute any such command, the situation is probably due to a bug and you should report it.