From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Path: news.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: Richard M Stallman Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.bugs Subject: bug#2022: 23.0.60; Rmail buffer marked modified after saving it Date: Tue, 27 Jan 2009 01:11:35 -0500 Message-ID: References: Reply-To: rms@gnu.org, 2022@emacsbugs.donarmstrong.com NNTP-Posting-Host: lo.gmane.org Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-15 X-Trace: ger.gmane.org 1233037506 7546 80.91.229.12 (27 Jan 2009 06:25:06 GMT) X-Complaints-To: usenet@ger.gmane.org NNTP-Posting-Date: Tue, 27 Jan 2009 06:25:06 +0000 (UTC) Cc: bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org, bug-submit-list@donarmstrong.com, 2022@emacsbugs.donarmstrong.com, owner@emacsbugs.donarmstrong.com To: Glenn Morris , 2022@emacsbugs.donarmstrong.com Original-X-From: bug-gnu-emacs-bounces+geb-bug-gnu-emacs=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Tue Jan 27 07:26:18 2009 Return-path: Envelope-to: geb-bug-gnu-emacs@m.gmane.org Original-Received: from lists.gnu.org ([199.232.76.165]) by lo.gmane.org with esmtp (Exim 4.50) id 1LRhOn-0000Nm-Fa for geb-bug-gnu-emacs@m.gmane.org; Tue, 27 Jan 2009 07:26:13 +0100 Original-Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1]:41429 helo=lists.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1LRhNV-0007j0-G8 for geb-bug-gnu-emacs@m.gmane.org; Tue, 27 Jan 2009 01:24:53 -0500 Original-Received: from mailman by lists.gnu.org with tmda-scanned (Exim 4.43) id 1LRhMF-0007Q1-SZ for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Tue, 27 Jan 2009 01:23:35 -0500 Original-Received: from exim by lists.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.43) id 1LRhMC-0007PR-Ms for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Tue, 27 Jan 2009 01:23:35 -0500 Original-Received: from [199.232.76.173] (port=36507 helo=monty-python.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1LRhMC-0007PK-7X for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Tue, 27 Jan 2009 01:23:32 -0500 Original-Received: from rzlab.ucr.edu ([138.23.92.77]:46621) by monty-python.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS-1.0:DHE_RSA_AES_256_CBC_SHA1:32) (Exim 4.60) (envelope-from ) id 1LRhMB-0006PW-JW for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Tue, 27 Jan 2009 01:23:31 -0500 Original-Received: from rzlab.ucr.edu (rzlab.ucr.edu [127.0.0.1]) by rzlab.ucr.edu (8.13.8/8.13.8/Debian-3) with ESMTP id n0R6NTHW006985; Mon, 26 Jan 2009 22:23:29 -0800 Original-Received: (from debbugs@localhost) by rzlab.ucr.edu (8.13.8/8.13.8/Submit) id n0R6K5om005936; Mon, 26 Jan 2009 22:20:05 -0800 X-Loop: owner@emacsbugs.donarmstrong.com Resent-From: Richard M Stallman Resent-To: bug-submit-list@donarmstrong.com Resent-CC: Emacs Bugs , owner@emacsbugs.donarmstrong.com Resent-Date: Tue, 27 Jan 2009 06:20:04 +0000 Resent-Message-ID: Resent-Sender: owner@emacsbugs.donarmstrong.com X-Emacs-PR-Message: followup 2022 X-Emacs-PR-Package: emacs,rmail X-Emacs-PR-Keywords: Original-Received: via spool by 2022-submit@emacsbugs.donarmstrong.com id=B2022.12330368024532 (code B ref 2022); Tue, 27 Jan 2009 06:20:04 +0000 Original-Received: (at 2022) by emacsbugs.donarmstrong.com; 27 Jan 2009 06:13:22 +0000 X-Spam-Bayes: score:0.5 Bayes not run. spammytokens:Tokens not available. hammytokens:Tokens not available. Original-Received: from fencepost.gnu.org (fencepost.gnu.org [140.186.70.10]) by rzlab.ucr.edu (8.13.8/8.13.8/Debian-3) with ESMTP id n0R6DEqg004518; Mon, 26 Jan 2009 22:13:15 -0800 Original-Received: from rms by fencepost.gnu.org with local (Exim 4.67) (envelope-from ) id 1LRhAd-00068T-Fc; Tue, 27 Jan 2009 01:11:35 -0500 In-reply-to: (message from Glenn Morris on Mon, 26 Jan 2009 02:25:59 -0500) X-detected-operating-system: by monty-python.gnu.org: GNU/Linux 2.6 (newer, 3) Resent-Date: Tue, 27 Jan 2009 01:23:34 -0500 X-BeenThere: bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: "Bug reports for GNU Emacs, the Swiss army knife of text editors" List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Original-Sender: bug-gnu-emacs-bounces+geb-bug-gnu-emacs=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Errors-To: bug-gnu-emacs-bounces+geb-bug-gnu-emacs=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Xref: news.gmane.org gmane.emacs.bugs:24595 Archived-At: Rmail was including the Resent-To and Resent-CC addresses in the reply. It was established on emacs-devel in June 2008 that this is incorrect according to RFC 2822 (filed as bug#512). This conclusion seems really strange. If you received a message that was resent to you and others, shouldn't they be in the CC for your response? I searched my mail from June for bug.512 and got no matches. Can you send me whatever message stated the reasons for this conclusion?