From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Path: news.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: Richard M Stallman Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.bugs,gmane.emacs.pretest.bugs Subject: bug#1705: 23.0.60; parallel build failure: `mh-e' was not provided Date: Tue, 06 Jan 2009 07:31:03 -0500 Message-ID: References: Reply-To: rms@gnu.org, 1705@emacsbugs.donarmstrong.com NNTP-Posting-Host: lo.gmane.org Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-15 X-Trace: ger.gmane.org 1231245828 2033 80.91.229.12 (6 Jan 2009 12:43:48 GMT) X-Complaints-To: usenet@ger.gmane.org NNTP-Posting-Date: Tue, 6 Jan 2009 12:43:48 +0000 (UTC) Cc: emacs-pretest-bug@gnu.org, markus.triska@gmx.at To: Stefan Monnier , 1705@emacsbugs.donarmstrong.com Original-X-From: bug-gnu-emacs-bounces+geb-bug-gnu-emacs=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Tue Jan 06 13:44:59 2009 Return-path: Envelope-to: geb-bug-gnu-emacs@m.gmane.org Original-Received: from lists.gnu.org ([199.232.76.165]) by lo.gmane.org with esmtp (Exim 4.50) id 1LKBIo-0006Lc-Lf for geb-bug-gnu-emacs@m.gmane.org; Tue, 06 Jan 2009 13:44:58 +0100 Original-Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1]:43968 helo=lists.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1LKBHZ-0007uV-6W for geb-bug-gnu-emacs@m.gmane.org; Tue, 06 Jan 2009 07:43:41 -0500 Original-Received: from mailman by lists.gnu.org with tmda-scanned (Exim 4.43) id 1LKBHM-0007qm-KT for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Tue, 06 Jan 2009 07:43:28 -0500 Original-Received: from exim by lists.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.43) id 1LKBHL-0007qK-Je for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Tue, 06 Jan 2009 07:43:28 -0500 Original-Received: from [199.232.76.173] (port=42025 helo=monty-python.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1LKBHL-0007qB-Ao for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Tue, 06 Jan 2009 07:43:27 -0500 Original-Received: from rzlab.ucr.edu ([138.23.92.77]:43936) by monty-python.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS-1.0:DHE_RSA_AES_256_CBC_SHA1:32) (Exim 4.60) (envelope-from ) id 1LKBHK-0003yp-Bb for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Tue, 06 Jan 2009 07:43:26 -0500 Original-Received: from rzlab.ucr.edu (rzlab.ucr.edu [127.0.0.1]) by rzlab.ucr.edu (8.13.8/8.13.8/Debian-3) with ESMTP id n06ChN6p008782; Tue, 6 Jan 2009 04:43:24 -0800 Original-Received: (from debbugs@localhost) by rzlab.ucr.edu (8.13.8/8.13.8/Submit) id n06Ce64C007787; Tue, 6 Jan 2009 04:40:06 -0800 X-Loop: owner@emacsbugs.donarmstrong.com Resent-From: Richard M Stallman Resent-To: bug-submit-list@donarmstrong.com Resent-CC: Emacs Bugs Resent-Date: Tue, 06 Jan 2009 12:40:06 +0000 Resent-Message-ID: Resent-Sender: owner@emacsbugs.donarmstrong.com X-Emacs-PR-Message: followup 1705 X-Emacs-PR-Package: emacs X-Emacs-PR-Keywords: Original-Received: via spool by 1705-submit@emacsbugs.donarmstrong.com id=B1705.12312451426293 (code B ref 1705); Tue, 06 Jan 2009 12:40:06 +0000 Original-Received: (at 1705) by emacsbugs.donarmstrong.com; 6 Jan 2009 12:32:22 +0000 X-Spam-Bayes: score:0.5 Bayes not run. spammytokens:Tokens not available. hammytokens:Tokens not available. Original-Received: from fencepost.gnu.org (fencepost.gnu.org [140.186.70.10]) by rzlab.ucr.edu (8.13.8/8.13.8/Debian-3) with ESMTP id n06CWEVv006283; Tue, 6 Jan 2009 04:32:15 -0800 Original-Received: from rms by fencepost.gnu.org with local (Exim 4.67) (envelope-from ) id 1LKB5L-0007sB-7v; Tue, 06 Jan 2009 07:31:03 -0500 In-reply-to: (message from Stefan Monnier on Mon, 05 Jan 2009 17:21:23 -0500) X-detected-operating-system: by monty-python.gnu.org: GNU/Linux 2.6 (newer, 3) Resent-Date: Tue, 06 Jan 2009 07:43:28 -0500 X-BeenThere: bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: "Bug reports for GNU Emacs, the Swiss army knife of text editors" List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Original-Sender: bug-gnu-emacs-bounces+geb-bug-gnu-emacs=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Errors-To: bug-gnu-emacs-bounces+geb-bug-gnu-emacs=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Xref: news.gmane.org gmane.emacs.bugs:23818 gmane.emacs.pretest.bugs:23624 Archived-At: Neither is the preference of .elc even if it's older. In general, it is right to load the .elc even if older, because that way editing the source code does not immediately force you to use your new code. You get to choose (by compiling) when to make it active.