From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Path: news.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: "Richard M. Stallman" Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.bugs,gmane.emacs.pretest.bugs Subject: bug#1381: 23.0.60; capitalization of car and cdr in the doc Date: Fri, 21 Nov 2008 10:17:36 -0500 Message-ID: References: <000a01c94a73$c5bd1ed0$c2b22382@us.oracle.com> <00c601c94b2c$2b896a80$c2b22382@us.oracle.com> Reply-To: rms@gnu.org, 1381@emacsbugs.donarmstrong.com NNTP-Posting-Host: lo.gmane.org Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-15 X-Trace: ger.gmane.org 1227281443 11195 80.91.229.12 (21 Nov 2008 15:30:43 GMT) X-Complaints-To: usenet@ger.gmane.org NNTP-Posting-Date: Fri, 21 Nov 2008 15:30:43 +0000 (UTC) Cc: 1381@emacsbugs.donarmstrong.com, bug-submit-list@donarmstrong.com, bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org, emacs-pretest-bug@gnu.org To: "Drew Adams" Original-X-From: bug-gnu-emacs-bounces+geb-bug-gnu-emacs=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Fri Nov 21 16:31:44 2008 Return-path: Envelope-to: geb-bug-gnu-emacs@m.gmane.org Original-Received: from lists.gnu.org ([199.232.76.165]) by lo.gmane.org with esmtp (Exim 4.50) id 1L3Xyo-0001CO-DF for geb-bug-gnu-emacs@m.gmane.org; Fri, 21 Nov 2008 16:31:34 +0100 Original-Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1]:41482 helo=lists.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1L3Xxf-0002pl-0n for geb-bug-gnu-emacs@m.gmane.org; Fri, 21 Nov 2008 10:30:23 -0500 Original-Received: from mailman by lists.gnu.org with tmda-scanned (Exim 4.43) id 1L3Xxa-0002ov-CA for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Fri, 21 Nov 2008 10:30:18 -0500 Original-Received: from exim by lists.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.43) id 1L3XxY-0002oT-U9 for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Fri, 21 Nov 2008 10:30:18 -0500 Original-Received: from [199.232.76.173] (port=43734 helo=monty-python.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1L3XxY-0002oJ-LD for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Fri, 21 Nov 2008 10:30:16 -0500 Original-Received: from rzlab.ucr.edu ([138.23.92.77]:55100) by monty-python.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS-1.0:DHE_RSA_AES_256_CBC_SHA1:32) (Exim 4.60) (envelope-from ) id 1L3XxY-0006EP-Dj for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Fri, 21 Nov 2008 10:30:16 -0500 Original-Received: from rzlab.ucr.edu (rzlab.ucr.edu [127.0.0.1]) by rzlab.ucr.edu (8.13.8/8.13.8/Debian-3) with ESMTP id mALFU9JR013384; Fri, 21 Nov 2008 07:30:10 -0800 Original-Received: (from debbugs@localhost) by rzlab.ucr.edu (8.13.8/8.13.8/Submit) id mALFP7Cw011760; Fri, 21 Nov 2008 07:25:07 -0800 X-Loop: don@donarmstrong.com Resent-From: "Richard M. Stallman" Resent-To: bug-submit-list@donarmstrong.com Resent-CC: Emacs Bugs Resent-Date: Fri, 21 Nov 2008 15:25:07 +0000 Resent-Message-ID: Resent-Sender: don@donarmstrong.com X-Emacs-PR-Message: report 1381 X-Emacs-PR-Package: emacs X-Emacs-PR-Keywords: Original-Received: via spool by submit@emacsbugs.donarmstrong.com id=B.122728068010069 (code B ref -1); Fri, 21 Nov 2008 15:25:07 +0000 Original-Received: (at submit) by emacsbugs.donarmstrong.com; 21 Nov 2008 15:18:00 +0000 Original-Received: from fencepost.gnu.org (fencepost.gnu.org [140.186.70.10]) by rzlab.ucr.edu (8.13.8/8.13.8/Debian-3) with ESMTP id mALFHnxR010051; Fri, 21 Nov 2008 07:17:50 -0800 Original-Received: from rms by fencepost.gnu.org with local (Exim 4.67) (envelope-from ) id 1L3XlI-0002QC-MN; Fri, 21 Nov 2008 10:17:36 -0500 In-reply-to: <00c601c94b2c$2b896a80$c2b22382@us.oracle.com> (drew.adams@oracle.com) X-CrossAssassin-Score: 2 X-detected-operating-system: by monty-python.gnu.org: GNU/Linux 2.6 (newer, 3) Resent-Date: Fri, 21 Nov 2008 10:30:18 -0500 X-BeenThere: bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: "Bug reports for GNU Emacs, the Swiss army knife of text editors" List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Original-Sender: bug-gnu-emacs-bounces+geb-bug-gnu-emacs=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Errors-To: bug-gnu-emacs-bounces+geb-bug-gnu-emacs=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Xref: news.gmane.org gmane.emacs.bugs:22552 gmane.emacs.pretest.bugs:23385 Archived-At: OK, that's one thing. But my question was whether these shouldn't simply be treated as normal Emacs terms - just like cons, buffer, symbol, and frame, after they have been introduced (defined). The reason for using @sc on car and cdr is that they are acronyms. Those other terms are not acronyms.