From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Path: news.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: "Richard M. Stallman" Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.bugs Subject: bug#1237: 23.0.60; `switch-to-buffer-other-window' sometimes uses selected window Date: Mon, 03 Nov 2008 14:40:31 -0500 Message-ID: References: <20081024102730.972E2B43B34@mt-computer.local> <4901BF54.6020908@gmx.at> <4901DFA1.2010503@gmx.at> <490C9A90.40407@gmx.at> <490EA570.6060705@gmx.at> Reply-To: rms@gnu.org, 1237@emacsbugs.donarmstrong.com NNTP-Posting-Host: lo.gmane.org Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-15 X-Trace: ger.gmane.org 1225741860 15951 80.91.229.12 (3 Nov 2008 19:51:00 GMT) X-Complaints-To: usenet@ger.gmane.org NNTP-Posting-Date: Mon, 3 Nov 2008 19:51:00 +0000 (UTC) Cc: 1237@emacsbugs.donarmstrong.com To: martin rudalics Original-X-From: bug-gnu-emacs-bounces+geb-bug-gnu-emacs=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Mon Nov 03 20:52:01 2008 connect(): Connection refused Return-path: Envelope-to: geb-bug-gnu-emacs@m.gmane.org Original-Received: from lists.gnu.org ([199.232.76.165]) by lo.gmane.org with esmtp (Exim 4.50) id 1Kx5Sy-0006LM-HI for geb-bug-gnu-emacs@m.gmane.org; Mon, 03 Nov 2008 20:52:00 +0100 Original-Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1]:58412 helo=lists.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1Kx5Rr-0005pw-Ok for geb-bug-gnu-emacs@m.gmane.org; Mon, 03 Nov 2008 14:50:51 -0500 Original-Received: from mailman by lists.gnu.org with tmda-scanned (Exim 4.43) id 1Kx5RK-0005Y8-V6 for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Mon, 03 Nov 2008 14:50:19 -0500 Original-Received: from exim by lists.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.43) id 1Kx5RI-0005X2-3H for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Mon, 03 Nov 2008 14:50:17 -0500 Original-Received: from [199.232.76.173] (port=40205 helo=monty-python.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1Kx5RH-0005Wu-H8 for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Mon, 03 Nov 2008 14:50:15 -0500 Original-Received: from rzlab.ucr.edu ([138.23.92.77]:53981) by monty-python.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS-1.0:DHE_RSA_AES_256_CBC_SHA1:32) (Exim 4.60) (envelope-from ) id 1Kx5RF-0001yZ-Ld for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Mon, 03 Nov 2008 14:50:14 -0500 Original-Received: from rzlab.ucr.edu (rzlab.ucr.edu [127.0.0.1]) by rzlab.ucr.edu (8.13.8/8.13.8/Debian-3) with ESMTP id mA3Jo4x0013988; Mon, 3 Nov 2008 11:50:05 -0800 Original-Received: (from debbugs@localhost) by rzlab.ucr.edu (8.13.8/8.13.8/Submit) id mA3Jo2ch013845; Mon, 3 Nov 2008 11:50:02 -0800 X-Loop: don@donarmstrong.com Resent-From: "Richard M. Stallman" Resent-To: bug-submit-list@donarmstrong.com Resent-CC: Emacs Bugs Resent-Date: Mon, 03 Nov 2008 19:50:02 +0000 Resent-Message-ID: Resent-Sender: don@donarmstrong.com X-Emacs-PR-Message: report 1237 X-Emacs-PR-Package: emacs X-Emacs-PR-Keywords: Original-Received: via spool by 1237-submit@emacsbugs.donarmstrong.com id=B1237.122574141212605 (code B ref 1237); Mon, 03 Nov 2008 19:50:02 +0000 Original-Received: (at 1237) by emacsbugs.donarmstrong.com; 3 Nov 2008 19:43:32 +0000 Original-Received: from fencepost.gnu.org (fencepost.gnu.org [140.186.70.10]) by rzlab.ucr.edu (8.13.8/8.13.8/Debian-3) with ESMTP id mA3JhTTO012599 for <1237@emacsbugs.donarmstrong.com>; Mon, 3 Nov 2008 11:43:31 -0800 Original-Received: from rms by fencepost.gnu.org with local (Exim 4.67) (envelope-from ) id 1Kx5Hr-0004yZ-N8; Mon, 03 Nov 2008 14:40:31 -0500 In-reply-to: <490EA570.6060705@gmx.at> (message from martin rudalics on Mon, 03 Nov 2008 08:17:04 +0100) X-detected-operating-system: by monty-python.gnu.org: GNU/Linux 2.6 (newer, 3) Resent-Date: Mon, 03 Nov 2008 14:50:17 -0500 X-BeenThere: bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: "Bug reports for GNU Emacs, the Swiss army knife of text editors" List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Original-Sender: bug-gnu-emacs-bounces+geb-bug-gnu-emacs=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Errors-To: bug-gnu-emacs-bounces+geb-bug-gnu-emacs=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Xref: news.gmane.org gmane.emacs.bugs:22134 Archived-At: > I think it is very important to keep `with-selected-window' > and `save-selected-window' similar. If we make this change > in one, we had better make the change in the other too. I think so too. But the behavior was different (in the NORECORD aspect) already before my recent change. Was that intentional or was it a bug?