From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Path: news.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: "Richard M. Stallman" Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.bugs Subject: bug#810: 23.0.60; atomic-change-group narrowing problem Date: Tue, 02 Sep 2008 10:13:59 -0400 Message-ID: References: <48B6F562.9060006@gmail.com> <48BC2CE6.2070108@gmx.at> <48BC5C9D.9000008@gmx.at> Reply-To: rms@gnu.org, 810@emacsbugs.donarmstrong.com NNTP-Posting-Host: lo.gmane.org Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-15 X-Trace: ger.gmane.org 1220365682 23827 80.91.229.12 (2 Sep 2008 14:28:02 GMT) X-Complaints-To: usenet@ger.gmane.org NNTP-Posting-Date: Tue, 2 Sep 2008 14:28:02 +0000 (UTC) Cc: bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org, bug-submit-list@donarmstrong.com, 810@emacsbugs.donarmstrong.com To: martin rudalics , 810@emacsbugs.donarmstrong.com Original-X-From: bug-gnu-emacs-bounces+geb-bug-gnu-emacs=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Tue Sep 02 16:28:56 2008 Return-path: Envelope-to: geb-bug-gnu-emacs@m.gmane.org Original-Received: from lists.gnu.org ([199.232.76.165]) by lo.gmane.org with esmtp (Exim 4.50) id 1KaWsI-00080V-5S for geb-bug-gnu-emacs@m.gmane.org; Tue, 02 Sep 2008 16:28:55 +0200 Original-Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1]:45478 helo=lists.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1KaWrH-00079L-Vc for geb-bug-gnu-emacs@m.gmane.org; Tue, 02 Sep 2008 10:27:51 -0400 Original-Received: from mailman by lists.gnu.org with tmda-scanned (Exim 4.43) id 1KaWrD-00078l-Qw for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Tue, 02 Sep 2008 10:27:47 -0400 Original-Received: from exim by lists.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.43) id 1KaWrA-000786-Cu for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Tue, 02 Sep 2008 10:27:47 -0400 Original-Received: from [199.232.76.173] (port=36032 helo=monty-python.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1KaWr9-000783-VT for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Tue, 02 Sep 2008 10:27:44 -0400 Original-Received: from rzlab.ucr.edu ([138.23.92.77]:45064) by monty-python.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS-1.0:DHE_RSA_AES_256_CBC_SHA1:32) (Exim 4.60) (envelope-from ) id 1KaWr7-000691-Fp for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Tue, 02 Sep 2008 10:27:42 -0400 Original-Received: from rzlab.ucr.edu (rzlab.ucr.edu [127.0.0.1]) by rzlab.ucr.edu (8.13.8/8.13.8/Debian-3) with ESMTP id m82ERU63019794; Tue, 2 Sep 2008 07:27:32 -0700 Original-Received: (from debbugs@localhost) by rzlab.ucr.edu (8.13.8/8.13.8/Submit) id m82EP59p018577; Tue, 2 Sep 2008 07:25:05 -0700 X-Loop: don@donarmstrong.com Resent-From: "Richard M. Stallman" Resent-To: bug-submit-list@donarmstrong.com Resent-CC: Emacs Bugs Resent-Date: Tue, 02 Sep 2008 14:25:05 +0000 Resent-Message-ID: Resent-Sender: don@donarmstrong.com X-Emacs-PR-Message: report 810 X-Emacs-PR-Package: emacs X-Emacs-PR-Keywords: Original-Received: via spool by submit@emacsbugs.donarmstrong.com id=B.122036494316313 (code B ref -1); Tue, 02 Sep 2008 14:25:05 +0000 Original-Received: (at submit) by emacsbugs.donarmstrong.com; 2 Sep 2008 14:15:43 +0000 Original-Received: from lists.gnu.org (lists.gnu.org [199.232.76.165]) by rzlab.ucr.edu (8.13.8/8.13.8/Debian-3) with ESMTP id m82EFeZl016302 for ; Tue, 2 Sep 2008 07:15:41 -0700 Original-Received: from mailman by lists.gnu.org with tmda-scanned (Exim 4.43) id 1KaWfT-0000tj-Mp for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Tue, 02 Sep 2008 10:15:39 -0400 Original-Received: from exim by lists.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.43) id 1KaWfS-0000se-Qz for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Tue, 02 Sep 2008 10:15:39 -0400 Original-Received: from [199.232.76.173] (port=33550 helo=monty-python.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1KaWfS-0000sU-L4 for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Tue, 02 Sep 2008 10:15:38 -0400 Original-Received: from fencepost.gnu.org ([140.186.70.10]:54715) by monty-python.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.60) (envelope-from ) id 1KaWfS-0003bz-Pz for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Tue, 02 Sep 2008 10:15:38 -0400 Original-Received: from rms by fencepost.gnu.org with local (Exim 4.67) (envelope-from ) id 1KaWdr-0001vP-NF; Tue, 02 Sep 2008 10:14:00 -0400 In-reply-to: <48BC5C9D.9000008@gmx.at> (message from martin rudalics on Mon, 01 Sep 2008 23:20:29 +0200) X-detected-kernel: by monty-python.gnu.org: Linux 2.6, seldom 2.4 (older, 4) X-CrossAssassin-Score: 2 X-detected-kernel: by monty-python.gnu.org: Linux 2.6 (newer, 3) Resent-Date: Tue, 02 Sep 2008 10:27:47 -0400 X-BeenThere: bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: "Bug reports for GNU Emacs, the Swiss army knife of text editors" List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Original-Sender: bug-gnu-emacs-bounces+geb-bug-gnu-emacs=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Errors-To: bug-gnu-emacs-bounces+geb-bug-gnu-emacs=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Xref: news.gmane.org gmane.emacs.bugs:20016 Archived-At: I know what you mean but the present case is different. When someone uses narrowing within the atomic change group and we really want to undo the changes (we still can decide that we won't fix the bug ;-)) we have to widen the buffer. We could say that if the body of the atomic-change-group does narrowing, then it has the responsibility to widen again. That seems logical.