From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
Path: news.gmane.org!not-for-mail
From: Richard Stallman <rms@gnu.org>
Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.bugs
Subject: Re: rmail reply creates 2 CC: fields, violates RFC 2822
Date: Sat, 22 Dec 2007 16:08:43 -0500
Message-ID: <E1J6BaN-0000hb-NL@fencepost.gnu.org>
References: <wl8wsragzj2.fsf@glup.physics.ucf.edu>
Reply-To: rms@gnu.org
NNTP-Posting-Host: lo.gmane.org
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-15
X-Trace: ger.gmane.org 1198357856 31826 80.91.229.12 (22 Dec 2007 21:10:56 GMT)
X-Complaints-To: usenet@ger.gmane.org
NNTP-Posting-Date: Sat, 22 Dec 2007 21:10:56 +0000 (UTC)
Cc: bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org, jh@physics.ucf.edu
To: jh@physics.ucf.edu
Original-X-From: bug-gnu-emacs-bounces+geb-bug-gnu-emacs=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Sat Dec 22 22:11:07 2007
Return-path: <bug-gnu-emacs-bounces+geb-bug-gnu-emacs=m.gmane.org@gnu.org>
Envelope-to: geb-bug-gnu-emacs@m.gmane.org
Original-Received: from lists.gnu.org ([199.232.76.165])
	by lo.gmane.org with esmtp (Exim 4.50)
	id 1J6Bca-0005kf-3J
	for geb-bug-gnu-emacs@m.gmane.org; Sat, 22 Dec 2007 22:11:00 +0100
Original-Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1] helo=lists.gnu.org)
	by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43)
	id 1J6BcG-0000z5-0B
	for geb-bug-gnu-emacs@m.gmane.org; Sat, 22 Dec 2007 16:10:40 -0500
Original-Received: from mailman by lists.gnu.org with tmda-scanned (Exim 4.43)
	id 1J6BaQ-0007UG-UU
	for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Sat, 22 Dec 2007 16:08:46 -0500
Original-Received: from exim by lists.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.43)
	id 1J6BaO-0007RC-OF
	for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Sat, 22 Dec 2007 16:08:46 -0500
Original-Received: from [199.232.76.173] (helo=monty-python.gnu.org)
	by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1J6BaO-0007Qz-En
	for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Sat, 22 Dec 2007 16:08:44 -0500
Original-Received: from fencepost.gnu.org ([140.186.70.10])
	by monty-python.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.60)
	(envelope-from <rms@gnu.org>) id 1J6BaO-0000x1-44
	for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Sat, 22 Dec 2007 16:08:44 -0500
Original-Received: from rms by fencepost.gnu.org with local (Exim 4.60)
	(envelope-from <rms@gnu.org>)
	id 1J6BaN-0000hb-NL; Sat, 22 Dec 2007 16:08:43 -0500
In-reply-to: <wl8wsragzj2.fsf@glup.physics.ucf.edu> (message from Joe
	Harrington on Wed, 19 Dec 2007 16:12:01 -0500)
X-detected-kernel: by monty-python.gnu.org: Linux 2.6, seldom 2.4 (older, 4)
X-BeenThere: bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5
Precedence: list
List-Id: "Bug reports for GNU Emacs,
	the Swiss army knife of text editors" <bug-gnu-emacs.gnu.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <http://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/bug-gnu-emacs>,
	<mailto:bug-gnu-emacs-request@gnu.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://lists.gnu.org/pipermail/bug-gnu-emacs>
List-Post: <mailto:bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org>
List-Help: <mailto:bug-gnu-emacs-request@gnu.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <http://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/bug-gnu-emacs>,
	<mailto:bug-gnu-emacs-request@gnu.org?subject=subscribe>
Original-Sender: bug-gnu-emacs-bounces+geb-bug-gnu-emacs=m.gmane.org@gnu.org
Errors-To: bug-gnu-emacs-bounces+geb-bug-gnu-emacs=m.gmane.org@gnu.org
Xref: news.gmane.org gmane.emacs.bugs:17221
Archived-At: <http://permalink.gmane.org/gmane.emacs.bugs/17221>

It is ridiculous to restrict the user in this way.

I often send messages with multiple CC lines.  I put in multiple CC
lines by hand.  I'd rather program Rmail to automatically delete those
warnings (which should be easy) than go to the trouble of
consolidating CC fields.

Who should we contact to call for a change in RFC 2822?