From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Path: news.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: Richard Stallman Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.pretest.bugs,gmane.emacs.bugs Subject: bug#1201: Another overlay display bug Date: Sun, 19 Oct 2008 01:00:55 -0400 Message-ID: Reply-To: rms@gnu.org, 1201@emacsbugs.donarmstrong.com NNTP-Posting-Host: lo.gmane.org Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-15 X-Trace: ger.gmane.org 1224394223 17136 80.91.229.12 (19 Oct 2008 05:30:23 GMT) X-Complaints-To: usenet@ger.gmane.org NNTP-Posting-Date: Sun, 19 Oct 2008 05:30:23 +0000 (UTC) To: emacs-pretest-bug@gnu.org Original-X-From: bug-gnu-emacs-bounces+geb-bug-gnu-emacs=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Sun Oct 19 07:31:26 2008 connect(): Connection refused Return-path: Envelope-to: geb-bug-gnu-emacs@m.gmane.org Original-Received: from lists.gnu.org ([199.232.76.165]) by lo.gmane.org with esmtp (Exim 4.50) id 1KrQsu-0002la-6D for geb-bug-gnu-emacs@m.gmane.org; Sun, 19 Oct 2008 07:31:24 +0200 Original-Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1]:38560 helo=lists.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1KrQro-0004tj-O7 for geb-bug-gnu-emacs@m.gmane.org; Sun, 19 Oct 2008 01:30:16 -0400 Original-Received: from mailman by lists.gnu.org with tmda-scanned (Exim 4.43) id 1KrQri-0004t8-Ad for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Sun, 19 Oct 2008 01:30:10 -0400 Original-Received: from exim by lists.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.43) id 1KrQrf-0004se-CN for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Sun, 19 Oct 2008 01:30:09 -0400 Original-Received: from [199.232.76.173] (port=39862 helo=monty-python.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1KrQrf-0004sb-27 for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Sun, 19 Oct 2008 01:30:07 -0400 Original-Received: from rzlab.ucr.edu ([138.23.92.77]:42425) by monty-python.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS-1.0:DHE_RSA_AES_256_CBC_SHA1:32) (Exim 4.60) (envelope-from ) id 1KrQre-0008CX-FP for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Sun, 19 Oct 2008 01:30:06 -0400 Original-Received: from rzlab.ucr.edu (rzlab.ucr.edu [127.0.0.1]) by rzlab.ucr.edu (8.13.8/8.13.8/Debian-3) with ESMTP id m9J5U009026760; Sat, 18 Oct 2008 22:30:00 -0700 Original-Received: (from debbugs@localhost) by rzlab.ucr.edu (8.13.8/8.13.8/Submit) id m9J5A6a4022040; Sat, 18 Oct 2008 22:10:06 -0700 X-Loop: don@donarmstrong.com Resent-From: Richard Stallman Resent-To: bug-submit-list@donarmstrong.com Resent-CC: Emacs Bugs Resent-Date: Sun, 19 Oct 2008 05:10:06 +0000 Resent-Message-ID: Resent-Sender: don@donarmstrong.com X-Emacs-PR-Message: report 1201 X-Emacs-PR-Package: emacs X-Emacs-PR-Keywords: Original-Received: via spool by submit@emacsbugs.donarmstrong.com id=B.122439261519869 (code B ref -1); Sun, 19 Oct 2008 05:10:06 +0000 Original-Received: (at submit) by emacsbugs.donarmstrong.com; 19 Oct 2008 05:03:35 +0000 Original-Received: from fencepost.gnu.org (fencepost.gnu.org [140.186.70.10]) by rzlab.ucr.edu (8.13.8/8.13.8/Debian-3) with ESMTP id m9J53WwZ019863 for ; Sat, 18 Oct 2008 22:03:33 -0700 Original-Received: from rms by fencepost.gnu.org with local (Exim 4.67) (envelope-from ) id 1KrQPP-0007Y2-My; Sun, 19 Oct 2008 01:00:55 -0400 X-detected-operating-system: by monty-python.gnu.org: GNU/Linux 2.6 (newer, 3) Resent-Date: Sun, 19 Oct 2008 01:30:09 -0400 X-BeenThere: bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: "Bug reports for GNU Emacs, the Swiss army knife of text editors" List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Original-Sender: bug-gnu-emacs-bounces+geb-bug-gnu-emacs=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Errors-To: bug-gnu-emacs-bounces+geb-bug-gnu-emacs=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Xref: news.gmane.org gmane.emacs.pretest.bugs:23253 gmane.emacs.bugs:21669 Archived-At: Here's another bug that was reported a year ago which I think should not be forgotten. From: Richard Stallman Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-15 To: emacs-devel@gnu.org Subject: Another overlay display bug Reply-To: rms@gnu.org Message-Id: Date: Mon, 10 Dec 2007 10:19:14 -0500 Would someone please fix this, then ack? To: bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org From: Joe Wells Date: Sat, 20 Oct 2007 06:43:43 +0100 In-Reply-To: <86k5pi9wrg.fsf@macs.hw.ac.uk> (Joe Wells's message of "Sat\, 20 Oct 2007 06\:32\:19 +0100") MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Subject: Re: two display bugs involving interactions between after-string and display properties of adjacent overlays Joe Wells writes: > Here are two more display bugs I found while trying to improve the > code in tex-fold.el in AUCTeX. Here is a third such bug. > These bugs involve interactions between after-string and display > properties of adjacent overlays. Ditto. > I'm assuming this macro in my reproduction code below: > > (defmacro test-in-fresh-buffer-and-window (&rest body) > `(progn > (delete-other-windows) > (kill-buffer (get-buffer-create "xyzzy")) > (let ((xyzzy-buf (get-buffer-create "xyzzy"))) > (set-buffer xyzzy-buf) > (display-buffer xyzzy-buf) > ,@body > ))) Ditto. > BUG #1: ... > BUG #2: ... BUG #3: An overlay's after-string property is not displayed if an immediately following overlay has the empty string as its display property. Reproduce with this expression: (test-in-fresh-buffer-and-window (insert "ABCD") (let ((o1 (make-overlay 2 3)) (o2 (make-overlay 3 4))) (overlay-put o1 'after-string "1") (overlay-put o2 'display ""))) The above expression should display ?AB1D?. The above expression wrongly actually displays ?ABD?. > ====================================================================== > In GNU Emacs 22.1.1 (i686-pc-linux-gnu, GTK+ Version 2.8.20) ... Same details as in last message. I hope this bug report is helpful. -- Joe