From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Path: news.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: Richard Stallman Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.cc-mode.general,gmane.emacs.bugs Subject: Re: c-mark-function goes too far Date: Wed, 10 Jan 2007 13:46:17 -0500 Message-ID: References: <000c01c73202$ec8e9880$6506a8c0@fountain> <87hcuz69lh.fsf@catnip.gol.com> Reply-To: rms@gnu.org NNTP-Posting-Host: lo.gmane.org Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Trace: sea.gmane.org 1168454824 30772 80.91.229.12 (10 Jan 2007 18:47:04 GMT) X-Complaints-To: usenet@sea.gmane.org NNTP-Posting-Date: Wed, 10 Jan 2007 18:47:04 +0000 (UTC) Cc: offby1@blarg.net, bug-cc-mode@gnu.org, bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org Original-X-From: cc-mode-help-bounces@lists.sourceforge.net Wed Jan 10 19:47:02 2007 Return-path: Envelope-to: sf-cc-mode-help@m.gmane.org Original-Received: from lists-outbound.sourceforge.net ([66.35.250.225]) by lo.gmane.org with esmtp (Exim 4.50) id 1H4iTT-0005uP-2L for sf-cc-mode-help@m.gmane.org; Wed, 10 Jan 2007 19:46:59 +0100 Original-Received: from sc8-sf-list1-new.sourceforge.net (sc8-sf-list1-new-b.sourceforge.net [10.3.1.93]) by sc8-sf-spam2.sourceforge.net (Postfix) with ESMTP id 882BD128C6; Wed, 10 Jan 2007 10:46:58 -0800 (PST) Original-Received: from sc8-sf-mx1-b.sourceforge.net ([10.3.1.91] helo=mail.sourceforge.net) by sc8-sf-list1-new.sourceforge.net with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1H4iTQ-0004FQ-8u for cc-mode-help@lists.sourceforge.net; Wed, 10 Jan 2007 10:46:56 -0800 Original-Received: from fencepost.gnu.org ([199.232.76.164]) by mail.sourceforge.net with esmtps (TLSv1:AES256-SHA:256) (Exim 4.44) id 1H4iTO-0007uf-Rj for cc-mode-help@lists.sourceforge.net; Wed, 10 Jan 2007 10:46:56 -0800 Original-Received: from rms by fencepost.gnu.org with local (Exim 4.60) (envelope-from ) id 1H4iSn-0007OP-J7; Wed, 10 Jan 2007 13:46:17 -0500 Original-To: Miles Bader In-reply-to: <87hcuz69lh.fsf@catnip.gol.com> (message from Miles Bader on Wed, 10 Jan 2007 08:53:14 +0900) X-Spam-Score: 0.0 (/) X-Spam-Report: Spam Filtering performed by sourceforge.net. See http://spamassassin.org/tag/ for more details. Report problems to http://sf.net/tracker/?func=add&group_id=1&atid=200001 X-BeenThere: cc-mode-help@lists.sourceforge.net X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.8 Precedence: list List-Id: "Bug reports, feature requests, and general talk about CC Mode." List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Original-Sender: cc-mode-help-bounces@lists.sourceforge.net Errors-To: cc-mode-help-bounces@lists.sourceforge.net Xref: news.gmane.org gmane.emacs.cc-mode.general:4301 gmane.emacs.bugs:15518 Archived-At: Languages like Java have it much worse -- even isolated braces are indented because functions are always methods within a class, so Emacs function-oriented commands basically never do the right thing. What about the commands that CC mode provides in Java mode? Do they work better in these cases? ------------------------------------------------------------------------- Take Surveys. Earn Cash. Influence the Future of IT Join SourceForge.net's Techsay panel and you'll get the chance to share your opinions on IT & business topics through brief surveys - and earn cash http://www.techsay.com/default.php?page=join.php&p=sourceforge&CID=DEVDEV