From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Path: news.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: Richard Stallman Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.bugs,gmane.emacs.xemacs.beta Subject: Re: checking for fields Date: Fri, 25 Aug 2006 16:25:06 -0400 Message-ID: References: <13lkpeawcu.fsf@mo.msk.ru> Reply-To: rms@gnu.org NNTP-Posting-Host: main.gmane.org Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-15 X-Trace: sea.gmane.org 1156537730 20242 80.91.229.2 (25 Aug 2006 20:28:50 GMT) X-Complaints-To: usenet@sea.gmane.org NNTP-Posting-Date: Fri, 25 Aug 2006 20:28:50 +0000 (UTC) Cc: bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org, james@xemacs.org, kifer@cs.stonybrook.edu, xemacs-beta@xemacs.org Original-X-From: bug-gnu-emacs-bounces+geb-bug-gnu-emacs=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Fri Aug 25 22:28:48 2006 Return-path: Envelope-to: geb-bug-gnu-emacs@m.gmane.org Original-Received: from lists.gnu.org ([199.232.76.165]) by ciao.gmane.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1GGiIF-0008DQ-Gr for geb-bug-gnu-emacs@m.gmane.org; Fri, 25 Aug 2006 22:28:45 +0200 Original-Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1] helo=lists.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1GGiIF-0000RK-0g for geb-bug-gnu-emacs@m.gmane.org; Fri, 25 Aug 2006 16:28:43 -0400 Original-Received: from mailman by lists.gnu.org with tmda-scanned (Exim 4.43) id 1GGiEo-00078Q-BW for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Fri, 25 Aug 2006 16:25:10 -0400 Original-Received: from exim by lists.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.43) id 1GGiEn-00077t-Qz for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Fri, 25 Aug 2006 16:25:09 -0400 Original-Received: from [199.232.76.173] (helo=monty-python.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1GGiEn-00077d-Hk for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Fri, 25 Aug 2006 16:25:09 -0400 Original-Received: from [199.232.76.164] (helo=fencepost.gnu.org) by monty-python.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.52) id 1GGiN9-0003EN-Fc for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Fri, 25 Aug 2006 16:33:47 -0400 Original-Received: from rms by fencepost.gnu.org with local (Exim 4.34) id 1GGiEk-0004Gy-GF; Fri, 25 Aug 2006 16:25:06 -0400 Original-To: "Ilya N. Golubev" In-reply-to: <13lkpeawcu.fsf@mo.msk.ru> (gin@mo.msk.ru) X-BeenThere: bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: "Bug reports for GNU Emacs, the Swiss army knife of text editors" List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Original-Sender: bug-gnu-emacs-bounces+geb-bug-gnu-emacs=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Errors-To: bug-gnu-emacs-bounces+geb-bug-gnu-emacs=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Xref: news.gmane.org gmane.emacs.bugs:15277 gmane.emacs.xemacs.beta:23401 Archived-At: It signals that now it is to complain about release 21 bugs. That is because we are getting close to pretesting Emacs 22. Until 21 release, it was to do so. Quite the contrary! That was the best time to report them. The whole point of pretesting Emacs 21 was to fix its bugs before it was released. We continued fixing bugs in Emacs 21 for a while after it was released. But now we would rather focus on fixing whatever bugs remain in Emacs 22. Do these problems still exist in the CVS sources which will become Emacs 22? The basic idea of field handling is unchanged in Emacs 22, but some details may be different, so I would really appreciate your checking and reporting _specific_ Emacs 22 problems now.