From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
Path: main.gmane.org!not-for-mail
From: Richard Stallman <rms@gnu.org>
Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.bugs
Subject: Re: Emacs crashes unless using -nw option
Date: Sat, 09 Oct 2004 11:44:29 -0400
Sender: bug-gnu-emacs-bounces+geb-bug-gnu-emacs=m.gmane.org@gnu.org
Message-ID: <E1CGJOX-0000pu-GT@fencepost.gnu.org>
References: <20041007223113.A439160CE8@localhost.ucsd.edu>
Reply-To: rms@gnu.org
NNTP-Posting-Host: deer.gmane.org
X-Trace: sea.gmane.org 1097336793 3503 80.91.229.6 (9 Oct 2004 15:46:33 GMT)
X-Complaints-To: usenet@sea.gmane.org
NNTP-Posting-Date: Sat, 9 Oct 2004 15:46:33 +0000 (UTC)
Cc: bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org
Original-X-From: bug-gnu-emacs-bounces+geb-bug-gnu-emacs=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Sat Oct 09 17:46:29 2004
Return-path: <bug-gnu-emacs-bounces+geb-bug-gnu-emacs=m.gmane.org@gnu.org>
Original-Received: from lists.gnu.org ([199.232.76.165])
	by deer.gmane.org with esmtp (Exim 3.35 #1 (Debian))
	id 1CGJQT-0002cq-00
	for <geb-bug-gnu-emacs@m.gmane.org>; Sat, 09 Oct 2004 17:46:29 +0200
Original-Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1] helo=lists.gnu.org)
	by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.33)
	id 1CGJXJ-0000Qu-PR
	for geb-bug-gnu-emacs@m.gmane.org; Sat, 09 Oct 2004 11:53:33 -0400
Original-Received: from mailman by lists.gnu.org with tmda-scanned (Exim 4.33)
	id 1CGJVV-0007fk-Os
	for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Sat, 09 Oct 2004 11:51:41 -0400
Original-Received: from exim by lists.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.33)
	id 1CGJVU-0007f2-Rh
	for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Sat, 09 Oct 2004 11:51:41 -0400
Original-Received: from [199.232.76.173] (helo=monty-python.gnu.org)
	by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.33) id 1CGJVU-0007eP-EJ
	for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Sat, 09 Oct 2004 11:51:40 -0400
Original-Received: from [199.232.76.164] (helo=fencepost.gnu.org)
	by monty-python.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.34) id 1CGJOY-0000MN-5A
	for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Sat, 09 Oct 2004 11:44:30 -0400
Original-Received: from rms by fencepost.gnu.org with local (Exim 4.34)
	id 1CGJOX-0000pu-GT; Sat, 09 Oct 2004 11:44:29 -0400
Original-To: Brian Parent <bparent@ratbert.ucsd.edu>
In-reply-to: <20041007223113.A439160CE8@localhost.ucsd.edu> (message from
	Brian Parent on Thu, 7 Oct 2004 15:31:13 -0700 (PDT))
X-BeenThere: bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5
Precedence: list
List-Id: "Bug reports for GNU Emacs,
	the Swiss army knife of text editors" <bug-gnu-emacs.gnu.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <http://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/bug-gnu-emacs>,
	<mailto:bug-gnu-emacs-request@gnu.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://lists.gnu.org/pipermail/bug-gnu-emacs>
List-Post: <mailto:bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org>
List-Help: <mailto:bug-gnu-emacs-request@gnu.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <http://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/bug-gnu-emacs>,
	<mailto:bug-gnu-emacs-request@gnu.org?subject=subscribe>
Errors-To: bug-gnu-emacs-bounces+geb-bug-gnu-emacs=m.gmane.org@gnu.org
Xref: main.gmane.org gmane.emacs.bugs:9245
X-Report-Spam: http://spam.gmane.org/gmane.emacs.bugs:9245

The configure script is what figures out whether to use -z nocombreloc.
Can you debug why it made the wrong decision on your system?
If you figure that out, maybe we can fix it.

The code in configure that does this test starts with these lines:

late_LDFLAGS=$LDFLAGS
if test "$GCC" = yes; then
  LDFLAGS="$LDFLAGS -Wl,-znocombreloc"
else
  LDFLAGS="$LDFLAGS -znocombreloc"
fi