From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
Path: main.gmane.org!not-for-mail
From: Richard Stallman <rms@gnu.org>
Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.bugs
Subject: Re: Variant spellings in GNU Emacs documentation
Date: Mon, 19 Jan 2004 15:12:04 -0500
Sender: bug-gnu-emacs-bounces+geb-bug-gnu-emacs=m.gmane.org@gnu.org
Message-ID: <E1Aifki-0005N9-5O@fencepost.gnu.org>
References: <Pine.LNX.4.58.0401171710410.1565@mnemosyne>
	<E1AiIO1-0005zZ-E1@fencepost.gnu.org>
	<Pine.LNX.4.58.0401182327360.4049@mnemosyne>
Reply-To: rms@gnu.org
NNTP-Posting-Host: deer.gmane.org
X-Trace: sea.gmane.org 1074543618 2242 80.91.224.253 (19 Jan 2004 20:20:18 GMT)
X-Complaints-To: usenet@sea.gmane.org
NNTP-Posting-Date: Mon, 19 Jan 2004 20:20:18 +0000 (UTC)
Cc: bugs-gnu-emacs@gnu.org, bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org
Original-X-From: bug-gnu-emacs-bounces+geb-bug-gnu-emacs=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Mon Jan 19 21:20:12 2004
Return-path: <bug-gnu-emacs-bounces+geb-bug-gnu-emacs=m.gmane.org@gnu.org>
Original-Received: from monty-python.gnu.org ([199.232.76.173])
	by deer.gmane.org with esmtp (Exim 3.35 #1 (Debian))
	id 1Aifsa-0000xG-00
	for <geb-bug-gnu-emacs@m.gmane.org>; Mon, 19 Jan 2004 21:20:12 +0100
Original-Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1] helo=monty-python.gnu.org)
	by monty-python.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.24)
	id 1AifpY-0000kk-W5
	for geb-bug-gnu-emacs@m.gmane.org; Mon, 19 Jan 2004 15:17:04 -0500
Original-Received: from list by monty-python.gnu.org with tmda-scanned (Exim 4.24)
	id 1Aifn7-0008Rb-Na
	for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Mon, 19 Jan 2004 15:14:33 -0500
Original-Received: from mail by monty-python.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.24)
	id 1AifmW-00087J-4z
	for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Mon, 19 Jan 2004 15:14:28 -0500
Original-Received: from [199.232.76.164] (helo=fencepost.gnu.org)
	by monty-python.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.24) id 1AifmV-00087B-TB
	for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Mon, 19 Jan 2004 15:13:55 -0500
Original-Received: from rms by fencepost.gnu.org with local (Exim 4.24)
	id 1Aifki-0005N9-5O; Mon, 19 Jan 2004 15:12:04 -0500
Original-To: Reuben Thomas <rrt@mupsych.org>
In-reply-to: <Pine.LNX.4.58.0401182327360.4049@mnemosyne> (message from Reuben
	Thomas on Sun, 18 Jan 2004 23:28:21 +0100 (CET))
X-BeenThere: bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.2
Precedence: list
List-Id: Bug reports for GNU Emacs, the Swiss army knife of text editors
	<bug-gnu-emacs.gnu.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <http://mail.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/bug-gnu-emacs>,
	<mailto:bug-gnu-emacs-request@gnu.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://mail.gnu.org/pipermail/bug-gnu-emacs>
List-Post: <mailto:bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org>
List-Help: <mailto:bug-gnu-emacs-request@gnu.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <http://mail.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/bug-gnu-emacs>,
	<mailto:bug-gnu-emacs-request@gnu.org?subject=subscribe>
Errors-To: bug-gnu-emacs-bounces+geb-bug-gnu-emacs=m.gmane.org@gnu.org
Xref: main.gmane.org gmane.emacs.bugs:6645
X-Report-Spam: http://spam.gmane.org/gmane.emacs.bugs:6645

    > Writing "MS-DOG" is a common practice for us--it is not an error.

    But it does look unprofessional.

I don't give much credence to other people's ideas of what looks
"professional".