From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Path: main.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: Richard Stallman Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.bugs,gmane.emacs.devel Subject: Re: Emacs 21/X11 generating unbelieveable network traffic Date: Wed, 02 Oct 2002 00:07:21 -0400 Sender: bug-gnu-emacs-admin@gnu.org Message-ID: References: Reply-To: rms@gnu.org NNTP-Posting-Host: localhost.gmane.org X-Trace: main.gmane.org 1033531717 5462 127.0.0.1 (2 Oct 2002 04:08:37 GMT) X-Complaints-To: usenet@main.gmane.org NNTP-Posting-Date: Wed, 2 Oct 2002 04:08:37 +0000 (UTC) Cc: bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org, emacs-devel@gnu.org Return-path: Original-Received: from monty-python.gnu.org ([199.232.76.173]) by main.gmane.org with esmtp (Exim 3.35 #1 (Debian)) id 17waoN-0001Pq-00 for ; Wed, 02 Oct 2002 06:08:35 +0200 Original-Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1] helo=monty-python.gnu.org) by monty-python.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.10) id 17waoh-0005m9-00; Wed, 02 Oct 2002 00:08:55 -0400 Original-Received: from list by monty-python.gnu.org with tmda-scanned (Exim 4.10) id 17wanD-0005fO-00 for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Wed, 02 Oct 2002 00:07:23 -0400 Original-Received: from mail by monty-python.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.10) id 17wanB-0005ez-00 for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Wed, 02 Oct 2002 00:07:22 -0400 Original-Received: from fencepost.gnu.org ([199.232.76.164]) by monty-python.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.10) id 17wanB-0005et-00; Wed, 02 Oct 2002 00:07:21 -0400 Original-Received: from rms by fencepost.gnu.org with local (Exim 4.10) id 17wanB-0001xa-00; Wed, 02 Oct 2002 00:07:21 -0400 Original-To: david.abrahams@rcn.com In-reply-to: (david.abrahams@rcn.com) Errors-To: bug-gnu-emacs-admin@gnu.org X-BeenThere: bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.0.11 Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Post: List-Subscribe: , List-Id: Bug reports for GNU Emacs, the Swiss army knife of text editors List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: Xref: main.gmane.org gmane.emacs.bugs:3622 gmane.emacs.devel:8313 X-Report-Spam: http://spam.gmane.org/gmane.emacs.bugs:3622 Still, this is something emacs developers should want to fix, it seems to me! Probably so, but we are all volunteers and only a few of us know a lot about X. It would be very good if someone who knows enough about X would come and offer to help us.