From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Path: main.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: Edward Welbourne Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.bugs Subject: Re: Button Bar Date: Fri, 05 Jul 2002 15:17:45 +0200 Sender: bug-gnu-emacs-admin@gnu.org Message-ID: References: <20020705122249.GA179@xyz> Reply-To: eddy@opera.no NNTP-Posting-Host: localhost.gmane.org X-Trace: main.gmane.org 1025875230 15182 127.0.0.1 (5 Jul 2002 13:20:30 GMT) X-Complaints-To: usenet@main.gmane.org NNTP-Posting-Date: Fri, 5 Jul 2002 13:20:30 +0000 (UTC) Cc: bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org Return-path: Original-Received: from fencepost.gnu.org ([199.232.76.164]) by main.gmane.org with esmtp (Exim 3.33 #1 (Debian)) id 17QT0g-0003wX-00 for ; Fri, 05 Jul 2002 15:20:30 +0200 Original-Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1] helo=fencepost.gnu.org) by fencepost.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 3.34 #1 (Debian)) id 17QT1F-0004hd-00; Fri, 05 Jul 2002 09:21:05 -0400 Original-Received: from pat.opera.com ([193.69.113.22] helo=whorl.intern.opera.no) by fencepost.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 3.34 #1 (Debian)) id 17QSyd-0004dy-00 for ; Fri, 05 Jul 2002 09:18:23 -0400 Original-Received: from eddy by whorl.intern.opera.no with local (Exim 3.35 #1 (Debian)) id 17QSy1-0001M7-00; Fri, 05 Jul 2002 15:17:45 +0200 Original-To: paul.stoeber@stud.tu-ilmenau.de In-Reply-To: <20020705122249.GA179@xyz> (message from Paul Stoeber on Fri, 5 Jul 2002 12:22:49 +0000) Errors-To: bug-gnu-emacs-admin@gnu.org X-BeenThere: bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.0.11 Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Post: List-Subscribe: , List-Id: Bug reports for GNU Emacs, the Swiss army knife of text editors List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: Xref: main.gmane.org gmane.emacs.bugs:2476 X-Report-Spam: http://spam.gmane.org/gmane.emacs.bugs:2476 Thank you ;^) I'll leave you to imagine how *annoyed* I had to get before reporting *that* as a bug ... the remedy is proportionately welcome. > `emacs --no-windows' avoids graphical elements entirely, > as does not using X. ;-) ah, but with X I get 59 lines (plus a mode-line and minibuffer line) of width 162, or C-x 3 gives me two 78-column windows side-by-side - and this can only be improved when I finally sort out my mangled XF86 config (or give up and chose smaller fonts) - whereas the raw terminal only gives me 22 lines in one 79-column window (albeit with nice big friendly fonts). I can do the same with -nw in a big xterm (53 lines, 167 columns or twice 81), but the little subtle irritants get to me in the end. Having a Real Solution is the Right Answer. Making it easier to find in customization would help, too. Keep up the good work, Eddy.