From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Path: main.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: Eli Zaretskii Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.bugs Subject: Re: format hex numbers Date: Sun, 31 Mar 2002 13:03:21 -0500 Sender: bug-gnu-emacs-admin@gnu.org Message-ID: References: Reply-To: Eli Zaretskii NNTP-Posting-Host: localhost.gmane.org X-Trace: main.gmane.org 1017597982 28503 127.0.0.1 (31 Mar 2002 18:06:22 GMT) X-Complaints-To: usenet@main.gmane.org NNTP-Posting-Date: Sun, 31 Mar 2002 18:06:22 +0000 (UTC) Cc: bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org Original-Received: from fencepost.gnu.org ([199.232.76.164]) by main.gmane.org with esmtp (Exim 3.33 #1 (Debian)) id 16rjig-0007Pc-00 for ; Sun, 31 Mar 2002 20:06:22 +0200 Original-Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1] helo=fencepost.gnu.org) by fencepost.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 3.34 #1 (Debian)) id 16rjia-000735-00; Sun, 31 Mar 2002 13:06:16 -0500 Original-Received: from eliz by fencepost.gnu.org with local (Exim 3.34 #1 (Debian)) id 16rjfl-0006Yp-00; Sun, 31 Mar 2002 13:03:21 -0500 Original-To: David.Kastrup@t-online.de In-Reply-To: (David.Kastrup@t-online.de) Errors-To: bug-gnu-emacs-admin@gnu.org X-BeenThere: bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.0.8 Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Post: List-Subscribe: , List-Id: Bug reports for GNU Emacs, the Swiss army knife of text editors List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: Xref: main.gmane.org gmane.emacs.bugs:335 X-Report-Spam: http://spam.gmane.org/gmane.emacs.bugs:335 > From: David.Kastrup@t-online.de (David Kastrup) > Date: 31 Mar 2002 15:08:17 +0200 > > BTW, what is the difference in circulation between bug-gnu-emacs and > emacs-pretest-bug? In general, emacs-pretest-bug is only read by a small number of active developers. > The former is also gatewayed to gnu.emacs.bug, > that much I know. I am just trying to find out what bug should best > be sent to which list. It's best to send reports about unreleased versions (CVS and pretests) to emacs-pretest-bug. "M-x report-emacs-bug" will do that automatically for you, btw. > Are the lists and the progress on individual reports logged > somewhere? The lists are archived, although the archive for emacs-pretest-bug is not publicly available (archives of bug-gnu-emacs are accessible via mailman). There's no bug-tracking system for Emacs. It would be nice to have one, but someone will have to volunteer to set up and maintain that.