From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Path: news.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: "Drew Adams" Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.bugs Subject: bug#7533: 24.0.50; `dired-mark-pop-up': delete frame afterwards if `pop-up-frames' Date: Fri, 17 Dec 2010 08:55:40 -0800 Message-ID: References: <90E09641E9264B37932D2315E5E7E2EA@us.oracle.com><4CF7EDED.5090500@gmx.at><44FB8E26FD824BB18AE8A367F560C091@us.oracle.com><4CF8A7B2.5080306@gmx.at><1880532436F6447B97DC61F6050FF29F@us.oracle.com><4CF93418.9090405@gmx.at><4CF939E7.6030603@gmx.at> <87zkslw43z.fsf@stupidchicken.com> <9FA3601ABD5C49E79DDAF60EAFFCD7F0@us.oracle.com> <4D0B03EB.4050706@gmx.at> <4D0B8BE4.2050401@gmx.at> NNTP-Posting-Host: lo.gmane.org Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Trace: dough.gmane.org 1292606650 29892 80.91.229.12 (17 Dec 2010 17:24:10 GMT) X-Complaints-To: usenet@dough.gmane.org NNTP-Posting-Date: Fri, 17 Dec 2010 17:24:10 +0000 (UTC) Cc: 'Chong Yidong' , 7533@debbugs.gnu.org To: "'martin rudalics'" Original-X-From: bug-gnu-emacs-bounces+geb-bug-gnu-emacs=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Fri Dec 17 18:24:04 2010 Return-path: Envelope-to: geb-bug-gnu-emacs@m.gmane.org Original-Received: from lists.gnu.org ([199.232.76.165]) by lo.gmane.org with esmtp (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1PTe2F-0004TJ-6h for geb-bug-gnu-emacs@m.gmane.org; Fri, 17 Dec 2010 18:24:03 +0100 Original-Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1]:34057 helo=lists.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1PTe2E-0000wC-MR for geb-bug-gnu-emacs@m.gmane.org; Fri, 17 Dec 2010 12:24:02 -0500 Original-Received: from [140.186.70.92] (port=49931 helo=eggs.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1PTe1R-0000fo-TN for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Fri, 17 Dec 2010 12:23:58 -0500 Original-Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1PTe0w-0005rs-Ir for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Fri, 17 Dec 2010 12:23:13 -0500 Original-Received: from debbugs.gnu.org ([140.186.70.43]:58866) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1PTe0w-0005ro-HV for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Fri, 17 Dec 2010 12:22:42 -0500 Original-Received: from Debian-debbugs by debbugs.gnu.org with local (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1PTdWH-0001C8-O0; Fri, 17 Dec 2010 11:51:01 -0500 X-Loop: help-debbugs@gnu.org Resent-From: "Drew Adams" Original-Sender: debbugs-submit-bounces@debbugs.gnu.org Resent-To: owner@debbugs.gnu.org Resent-CC: bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org Resent-Date: Fri, 17 Dec 2010 16:51:01 +0000 Resent-Message-ID: Resent-Sender: help-debbugs@gnu.org X-GNU-PR-Message: followup 7533 X-GNU-PR-Package: emacs X-GNU-PR-Keywords: Original-Received: via spool by 7533-submit@debbugs.gnu.org id=B7533.12926046494574 (code B ref 7533); Fri, 17 Dec 2010 16:51:01 +0000 Original-Received: (at 7533) by debbugs.gnu.org; 17 Dec 2010 16:50:49 +0000 Original-Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1] helo=debbugs.gnu.org) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1PTdW4-0001Bj-I3 for submit@debbugs.gnu.org; Fri, 17 Dec 2010 11:50:48 -0500 Original-Received: from rcsinet10.oracle.com ([148.87.113.121]) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1PTdW2-0001BS-5T for 7533@debbugs.gnu.org; Fri, 17 Dec 2010 11:50:46 -0500 Original-Received: from rcsinet15.oracle.com (rcsinet15.oracle.com [148.87.113.117]) by rcsinet10.oracle.com (Switch-3.4.2/Switch-3.4.2) with ESMTP id oBHGv4T6028442 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA bits=256 verify=OK); Fri, 17 Dec 2010 16:57:05 GMT Original-Received: from acsmt355.oracle.com (acsmt355.oracle.com [141.146.40.155]) by rcsinet15.oracle.com (Switch-3.4.2/Switch-3.4.1) with ESMTP id oBHGqVOj005378; Fri, 17 Dec 2010 16:56:43 GMT Original-Received: from abhmt012.oracle.com by acsmt355.oracle.com with ESMTP id 885341071292604943; Fri, 17 Dec 2010 08:55:43 -0800 Original-Received: from dradamslap1 (/10.159.229.142) by default (Oracle Beehive Gateway v4.0) with ESMTP ; Fri, 17 Dec 2010 08:55:43 -0800 X-Mailer: Microsoft Office Outlook 11 In-Reply-To: <4D0B8BE4.2050401@gmx.at> Thread-Index: AcueBTFWDWz0EahgRwGb7PsNC2jfwgABNwDQ X-MimeOLE: Produced By Microsoft MimeOLE V6.00.2900.5994 X-BeenThere: debbugs-submit@debbugs.gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.11 Precedence: list Resent-Date: Fri, 17 Dec 2010 11:51:01 -0500 X-detected-operating-system: by eggs.gnu.org: GNU/Linux 2.6 (newer, 3) X-BeenThere: bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org List-Id: "Bug reports for GNU Emacs, the Swiss army knife of text editors" List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Original-Sender: bug-gnu-emacs-bounces+geb-bug-gnu-emacs=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Errors-To: bug-gnu-emacs-bounces+geb-bug-gnu-emacs=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Xref: news.gmane.org gmane.emacs.bugs:42597 Archived-At: > > Apparently you think that the proper fix of removing the > > frame is too hard to implement for some reason. In that > > case I request that we return to the sane behavior of Emacs 22. > > You can get the "sane" behavior if you don't include such buffers in > `special-display-regexps'. > > > emacs -Q in Emacs 22 does exactly what I described: it > > pops up a window, not a frame, and it removes the window > > when the user dialog is finished. > > emacs -Q in Emacs 23 does the same. Not at all. The context you omitted makes it clear that (a) you are reaching for straws by bringing in `dired-shrink-to-fit' and (b) Emacs 22 does not suffer the bug: it removes the temporary display when done. You are showing nothing but bad faith. Why did you even make the partial fix, wrt `pop-up-frames'? Why don't you just tell users they can get the "sane" behavior by setting `pop-up-frames' to nil? This is a sorry state indeed.