On Jan 7, 2009, at 11:27 AM, martin rudalics wrote: > > I can't image a situation when someone will want to display a narrow > > window on a full-height side window. At least I think currently > we should > > restore the old behavior when these commands displayed a narrow > window > > below the original window instead of a side window. > > I did this for `dired-pop-to-buffer'. > > > I think a general rule of thumb for finding all such cases should > be the > > following: when there is a call to `fit-window-to-buffer' after > calling > > `pop-to-buffer' then split windows vertically because otherwise > > `fit-window-to-buffer' makes no sense since it adjusts the window > height > > and can't do this on a full-height horizontally split window. > > Good suggestion. I found the following candidates: > > `Electric-pop-up-window', `ibuffer-confirm-operation-on', > `disabled-command-function', `proced-send-signal', > `fancy-startup-screen', `display-time-world', `widget-choose'. > > Can someone comment on these? We might also have to consider windows > affected by `temp-buffer-resize-mode'. I'll leave it to Carsten to > figure out what's best for `org-mode'. Hi Martin, org-mode already protects itself against this possibility, I think: Here is my code: (defun org-fit-window-to-buffer (&optional window max-height min-height shrink-only) "Fit WINDOW to the buffer, but only if it is not a side-by-side window. WINDOW defaults to the selected window. MAX-HEIGHT and MIN-HEIGHT are passed through to `fit-window-to-buffer'. If SHRINK-ONLY is set, call `shrink-window-if-larger-than-buffer' instead, the hight limit are ignored in this case." (cond ((> (frame-width) (window-width window)) ;; do nothing if another window would suffer ) ((and (fboundp 'fit-window-to-buffer) (not shrink-only)) (fit-window-to-buffer window max-height min-height)) ((fboundp 'shrink-window-if-larger-than-buffer) (shrink-window-if-larger-than-buffer window))) (or window (selected-window))) If the current window is not the full frame width, I do not adjust its size because it would shink other windows along with it. - Carsten > > > As for `calendar' I share Stefan's POV ... > > martin