From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Path: news.gmane.org!.POSTED.blaine.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: Eli Zaretskii Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.bugs Subject: bug#38818: jidanni's mail headers not perfect?! Date: Mon, 06 Jan 2020 12:02:32 +0200 Message-ID: References: <87imlxlrrv.5.fsf@jidanni.org> <87v9pv28qu.fsf@web.de> <87d0c33mdx.5.fsf@jidanni.org> <87o8vnq1ph.fsf@web.de> <875zhv3jyr.5.fsf@jidanni.org> <87eewjydyg.fsf@web.de> <87sgkw60fi.5.fsf@jidanni.org> <8736cwrub9.5.fsf@jidanni.org> <87y2uoqds6.5.fsf@jidanni.org> <83lfqlgbrk.fsf@gnu.org> <87sgktkbqg.8.fsf@jidanni.org> <838smlg2om.fsf@gnu.org> <87d0bxk9ea.8.fsf_-_@jidanni.org> <837e25g0lr.fsf@gnu.org> <875zhpng00.fsf@hase.home> <2DB34F98-B802-46A3-AA33-B614A1891D74@gnu.org> <871rsdndku.fsf@hase.home> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Injection-Info: blaine.gmane.org; posting-host="blaine.gmane.org:195.159.176.226"; logging-data="113911"; mail-complaints-to="usenet@blaine.gmane.org" User-Agent: K-9 Mail for Android Cc: pieter-l@vanoostrum.org, rms@gnu.org, michael_heerdegen@web.de, =?UTF-8?Q?=E7=A9=8D=E4=B8=B9=E5=B0=BC?= Dan Jacobson , larsi@gnus.org, 38818@debbugs.gnu.org To: Andreas Schwab Original-X-From: bug-gnu-emacs-bounces+geb-bug-gnu-emacs=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Mon Jan 06 11:03:10 2020 Return-path: Envelope-to: geb-bug-gnu-emacs@m.gmane.org Original-Received: from lists.gnu.org ([209.51.188.17]) by blaine.gmane.org with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.89) (envelope-from ) id 1ioPE6-000TUz-GG for geb-bug-gnu-emacs@m.gmane.org; Mon, 06 Jan 2020 11:03:10 +0100 Original-Received: from localhost ([::1]:50060 helo=lists1p.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1ioPE5-0001Ld-6h for geb-bug-gnu-emacs@m.gmane.org; Mon, 06 Jan 2020 05:03:09 -0500 Original-Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:470:142:3::10]:32818) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1ioPDz-0001KJ-Ku for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Mon, 06 Jan 2020 05:03:04 -0500 Original-Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1ioPDy-0007TS-Ng for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Mon, 06 Jan 2020 05:03:03 -0500 Original-Received: from debbugs.gnu.org ([209.51.188.43]:39087) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.0:RSA_AES_128_CBC_SHA1:16) (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1ioPDy-0007TI-KH for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Mon, 06 Jan 2020 05:03:02 -0500 Original-Received: from Debian-debbugs by debbugs.gnu.org with local (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1ioPDy-0005Oc-F1 for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Mon, 06 Jan 2020 05:03:02 -0500 X-Loop: help-debbugs@gnu.org Resent-From: Eli Zaretskii Original-Sender: "Debbugs-submit" Resent-CC: bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org Resent-Date: Mon, 06 Jan 2020 10:03:02 +0000 Resent-Message-ID: Resent-Sender: help-debbugs@gnu.org X-GNU-PR-Message: followup 38818 X-GNU-PR-Package: emacs Original-Received: via spool by 38818-submit@debbugs.gnu.org id=B38818.157830497020724 (code B ref 38818); Mon, 06 Jan 2020 10:03:02 +0000 Original-Received: (at 38818) by debbugs.gnu.org; 6 Jan 2020 10:02:50 +0000 Original-Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1]:45060 helo=debbugs.gnu.org) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1ioPDl-0005OC-TW for submit@debbugs.gnu.org; Mon, 06 Jan 2020 05:02:50 -0500 Original-Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([209.51.188.92]:51956) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1ioPDk-0005O0-DB for 38818@debbugs.gnu.org; Mon, 06 Jan 2020 05:02:49 -0500 Original-Received: from fencepost.gnu.org ([2001:470:142:3::e]:51877) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1ioPDe-0007KW-P3; Mon, 06 Jan 2020 05:02:42 -0500 Original-Received: from [176.12.180.157] (port=34087 helo=[10.212.47.98]) by fencepost.gnu.org with esmtpsa (TLS1.2:RSA_AES_128_CBC_SHA1:128) (Exim 4.82) (envelope-from ) id 1ioPDX-0000xp-Eg; Mon, 06 Jan 2020 05:02:35 -0500 In-Reply-To: <871rsdndku.fsf@hase.home> X-detected-operating-system: by eggs.gnu.org: GNU/Linux 2.2.x-3.x [generic] X-BeenThere: debbugs-submit@debbugs.gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.18 Precedence: list X-detected-operating-system: by eggs.gnu.org: GNU/Linux 2.2.x-3.x [generic] X-Received-From: 209.51.188.43 X-BeenThere: bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org List-Id: "Bug reports for GNU Emacs, the Swiss army knife of text editors" List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: bug-gnu-emacs-bounces+geb-bug-gnu-emacs=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Original-Sender: "bug-gnu-emacs" Xref: news.gmane.org gmane.emacs.bugs:174230 Archived-At: On January 6, 2020 11:23:13 AM GMT+02:00, Andreas Schwab wrote: > On Jan 06 2020, Eli Zaretskii wrote: >=20 > > On January 6, 2020 10:30:55 AM GMT+02:00, Andreas Schwab > wrote: > >> On Jan 05 2020, Eli Zaretskii wrote: > >>=20 > >> >> From: =3D?utf-8?B?56mN5Li55bC8?=3D Dan Jacobson > > >> >> ^^^^^^^^^^^ > >> > > >> > Why do you think this arrives intact to people's MUA? > >>=20 > >> Why do you think this does not arrive intact to people's MUA? > > > > Because some methods of fetching email auto-convert qp-encoded and > base64 encoded parts=2E >=20 > But that isn't the fault of the raw mail contents=2E This isn't about assigning blame, this is about finding where that mojibak= e comes from and what triggers it, and hopefully figuring out how to avoid = or fix that=2E