From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Path: news.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: "Drew Adams" Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.bugs Subject: bug#7296: display-pixel-height not enough Date: Tue, 2 Nov 2010 10:48:01 -0700 Message-ID: References: <4CCAC90B.4070800@swipnet.se> <4CCB2713.5070104@swipnet.se> <4CCBC930.5060705@swipnet.se> <4CCBF75B.8070209@swipnet.se> <4CCC558E.5030704@swipnet.se> <7C6D3056-3E04-46E5-A731-A2E996197F03@swipnet.se> <4CCD4A1C.6070707@swipnet.se> <4CCEA66C.8060900@swipnet.se> <4CCF1753.6010707@swipnet.se><83hbg06b9q.fsf@gnu.org> <83eib467v2.fsf@gnu.org><4CCF64BE.7020808@gnu.org> <83aals5q7w.fsf@gnu.org><4CD0115D.8050008@swipnet.se> NNTP-Posting-Host: lo.gmane.org Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Trace: dough.gmane.org 1288722084 2042 80.91.229.12 (2 Nov 2010 18:21:24 GMT) X-Complaints-To: usenet@dough.gmane.org NNTP-Posting-Date: Tue, 2 Nov 2010 18:21:24 +0000 (UTC) Cc: bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org To: "'Eli Zaretskii'" , "'Jan D.'" Original-X-From: bug-gnu-emacs-bounces+geb-bug-gnu-emacs=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Tue Nov 02 19:21:19 2010 Return-path: Envelope-to: geb-bug-gnu-emacs@m.gmane.org Original-Received: from lists.gnu.org ([199.232.76.165]) by lo.gmane.org with esmtp (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1PDLTy-0006ha-Ao for geb-bug-gnu-emacs@m.gmane.org; Tue, 02 Nov 2010 19:21:19 +0100 Original-Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1]:32821 helo=lists.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1PDLOA-0006Wk-Oc for geb-bug-gnu-emacs@m.gmane.org; Tue, 02 Nov 2010 14:15:18 -0400 Original-Received: from [140.186.70.92] (port=59280 helo=eggs.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1PDLNp-0005nZ-J1 for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Tue, 02 Nov 2010 14:15:14 -0400 Original-Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1PDLML-0007dV-3c for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Tue, 02 Nov 2010 14:13:26 -0400 Original-Received: from debbugs.gnu.org ([140.186.70.43]:59965) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1PDLML-0007dJ-0Q for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Tue, 02 Nov 2010 14:13:25 -0400 Original-Received: from Debian-debbugs by debbugs.gnu.org with local (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1PDKus-00013f-H0; Tue, 02 Nov 2010 13:45:02 -0400 X-Loop: help-debbugs@gnu.org Resent-From: "Drew Adams" Original-Sender: debbugs-submit-bounces@debbugs.gnu.org Resent-To: owner@debbugs.gnu.org Resent-CC: bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org Resent-Date: Tue, 02 Nov 2010 17:45:02 +0000 Resent-Message-ID: Resent-Sender: help-debbugs@gnu.org X-GNU-PR-Message: followup 7296 X-GNU-PR-Package: emacs X-GNU-PR-Keywords: Original-Received: via spool by submit@debbugs.gnu.org id=B.12887198654046 (code B ref -1); Tue, 02 Nov 2010 17:45:02 +0000 Original-Received: (at submit) by debbugs.gnu.org; 2 Nov 2010 17:44:25 +0000 Original-Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1] helo=debbugs.gnu.org) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1PDKuH-00013D-1W for submit@debbugs.gnu.org; Tue, 02 Nov 2010 13:44:25 -0400 Original-Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([140.186.70.92]) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1PDKuF-000138-4x for submit@debbugs.gnu.org; Tue, 02 Nov 2010 13:44:23 -0400 Original-Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1PDKyT-0004Yj-4V for submit@debbugs.gnu.org; Tue, 02 Nov 2010 13:48:46 -0400 Original-Received: from lists.gnu.org ([199.232.76.165]:42496) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1PDKyT-0004Yf-2E for submit@debbugs.gnu.org; Tue, 02 Nov 2010 13:48:45 -0400 Original-Received: from [140.186.70.92] (port=33434 helo=eggs.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1PDKyQ-0006vK-PN for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Tue, 02 Nov 2010 13:48:44 -0400 Original-Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1PDKyP-0004Xu-Ay for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Tue, 02 Nov 2010 13:48:42 -0400 Original-Received: from rcsinet10.oracle.com ([148.87.113.121]:21416) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1PDKyN-0004XI-5D; Tue, 02 Nov 2010 13:48:39 -0400 Original-Received: from rcsinet15.oracle.com (rcsinet15.oracle.com [148.87.113.117]) by rcsinet10.oracle.com (Switch-3.4.2/Switch-3.4.2) with ESMTP id oA2HmY5o023882 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA bits=256 verify=OK); Tue, 2 Nov 2010 17:48:35 GMT Original-Received: from acsmt355.oracle.com (acsmt355.oracle.com [141.146.40.155]) by rcsinet15.oracle.com (Switch-3.4.2/Switch-3.4.1) with ESMTP id oA2Fj6hq023797; Tue, 2 Nov 2010 17:48:33 GMT Original-Received: from abhmt020.oracle.com by acsmt353.oracle.com with ESMTP id 743093181288720091; Tue, 02 Nov 2010 10:48:11 -0700 Original-Received: from dradamslap1 (/10.159.219.93) by default (Oracle Beehive Gateway v4.0) with ESMTP ; Tue, 02 Nov 2010 10:48:06 -0700 X-Mailer: Microsoft Office Outlook 11 In-Reply-To: Thread-Index: Act6sbcbLSWDokUzSfGJxBr86xH0RgAAzEMg X-MimeOLE: Produced By Microsoft MimeOLE V6.00.2900.5994 X-detected-operating-system: by eggs.gnu.org: GNU/Linux 2.6 (newer, 3) X-detected-operating-system: by eggs.gnu.org: GNU/Linux 2.6, seldom 2.4 (older, 4) X-BeenThere: debbugs-submit@debbugs.gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.11 Precedence: list Resent-Date: Tue, 02 Nov 2010 13:45:02 -0400 X-detected-operating-system: by eggs.gnu.org: GNU/Linux 2.6 (newer, 3) X-BeenThere: bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org List-Id: "Bug reports for GNU Emacs, the Swiss army knife of text editors" List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Original-Sender: bug-gnu-emacs-bounces+geb-bug-gnu-emacs=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Errors-To: bug-gnu-emacs-bounces+geb-bug-gnu-emacs=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Xref: news.gmane.org gmane.emacs.bugs:41375 Archived-At: > So what are the objections to this (my original suggestion) at this > point? To be 100% clear, I suggest: > > . on w32, return the dimensions sans the reserved part(s) > . on other GUI platforms, no change from the current behavior Hardly 100% clear. Are you talking about changing the behavior of `display-pixel-height' or defining a new function to do that? You refer to your "original suggestion". Do you mean this suggestion: >> Wouldn't it make more sense for display-pixel-height/width >> to return the height available for display? and >> "Available" means it does not include portions that are not >> usable by any window. If so, that sounds like a proposal to change the meaning/behavior of the function. I, for one, object to that (see the thread). I have no objection to your defining a new function that does that (or anything else), however.