From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Path: news.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: "Drew Adams" Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.bugs Subject: bug#7545: 24.0.50; (elisp) `Simple Types' Date: Sat, 2 Jul 2011 08:26:37 -0700 Message-ID: References: <4EF744340E21483ABFE942FA8F1F2C12@us.oracle.com> <4E0F23D2.1010205@dogan.se> NNTP-Posting-Host: lo.gmane.org Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Trace: dough.gmane.org 1309620514 30878 80.91.229.12 (2 Jul 2011 15:28:34 GMT) X-Complaints-To: usenet@dough.gmane.org NNTP-Posting-Date: Sat, 2 Jul 2011 15:28:34 +0000 (UTC) Cc: 7545@debbugs.gnu.org To: "'Deniz Dogan'" , "'Lars Magne Ingebrigtsen'" Original-X-From: bug-gnu-emacs-bounces+geb-bug-gnu-emacs=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Sat Jul 02 17:28:27 2011 Return-path: Envelope-to: geb-bug-gnu-emacs@m.gmane.org Original-Received: from lists.gnu.org ([140.186.70.17]) by lo.gmane.org with esmtp (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1Qd27O-0005bt-UY for geb-bug-gnu-emacs@m.gmane.org; Sat, 02 Jul 2011 17:28:27 +0200 Original-Received: from localhost ([::1]:32944 helo=lists.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1Qd27N-00019U-I3 for geb-bug-gnu-emacs@m.gmane.org; Sat, 02 Jul 2011 11:28:25 -0400 Original-Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([140.186.70.92]:55848) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1Qd274-000199-01 for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Sat, 02 Jul 2011 11:28:07 -0400 Original-Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1Qd271-0007rr-Vh for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Sat, 02 Jul 2011 11:28:05 -0400 Original-Received: from debbugs.gnu.org ([140.186.70.43]:33187) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1Qd271-0007rg-Hs for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Sat, 02 Jul 2011 11:28:03 -0400 Original-Received: from Debian-debbugs by debbugs.gnu.org with local (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1Qd270-0005lh-Le; Sat, 02 Jul 2011 11:28:02 -0400 X-Loop: help-debbugs@gnu.org Resent-From: "Drew Adams" Original-Sender: debbugs-submit-bounces@debbugs.gnu.org Resent-To: owner@debbugs.gnu.org Resent-CC: bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org Resent-Date: Sat, 02 Jul 2011 15:28:02 +0000 Resent-Message-ID: Resent-Sender: help-debbugs@gnu.org X-GNU-PR-Message: followup 7545 X-GNU-PR-Package: emacs X-GNU-PR-Keywords: notabug Original-Received: via spool by 7545-submit@debbugs.gnu.org id=B7545.130962042422076 (code B ref 7545); Sat, 02 Jul 2011 15:28:02 +0000 Original-Received: (at 7545) by debbugs.gnu.org; 2 Jul 2011 15:27:04 +0000 Original-Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1] helo=debbugs.gnu.org) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1Qd264-0005k0-9n for submit@debbugs.gnu.org; Sat, 02 Jul 2011 11:27:04 -0400 Original-Received: from rcsinet15.oracle.com ([148.87.113.117]) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1Qd262-0005jX-KP for 7545@debbugs.gnu.org; Sat, 02 Jul 2011 11:27:03 -0400 Original-Received: from rtcsinet21.oracle.com (rtcsinet21.oracle.com [66.248.204.29]) by rcsinet15.oracle.com (Switch-3.4.4/Switch-3.4.4) with ESMTP id p62FQrFU015224 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA bits=256 verify=OK); Sat, 2 Jul 2011 15:26:55 GMT Original-Received: from acsmt358.oracle.com (acsmt358.oracle.com [141.146.40.158]) by rtcsinet21.oracle.com (8.14.4+Sun/8.14.4) with ESMTP id p62FQqt2002299 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA bits=256 verify=NO); Sat, 2 Jul 2011 15:26:53 GMT Original-Received: from abhmt107.oracle.com (abhmt107.oracle.com [141.146.116.59]) by acsmt358.oracle.com (8.12.11.20060308/8.12.11) with ESMTP id p62FQkcv016882; Sat, 2 Jul 2011 10:26:46 -0500 Original-Received: from dradamslap1 (/10.159.63.244) by default (Oracle Beehive Gateway v4.0) with ESMTP ; Sat, 02 Jul 2011 08:26:46 -0700 X-Mailer: Microsoft Office Outlook 11 In-Reply-To: <4E0F23D2.1010205@dogan.se> Thread-Index: Acw4wCRAfeA2gI4vRnWB04p1QTd7sAAC/5bw X-MimeOLE: Produced By Microsoft MimeOLE V6.00.2900.6109 X-Source-IP: rtcsinet21.oracle.com [66.248.204.29] X-CT-RefId: str=0001.0A090206.4E0F38C0.0015:SCFSTAT5015188, ss=1, re=-4.000, fgs=0 X-BeenThere: debbugs-submit@debbugs.gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.11 Precedence: list Resent-Date: Sat, 02 Jul 2011 11:28:02 -0400 X-detected-operating-system: by eggs.gnu.org: GNU/Linux 2.6 (newer, 3) X-Received-From: 140.186.70.43 X-BeenThere: bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org List-Id: "Bug reports for GNU Emacs, the Swiss army knife of text editors" List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: bug-gnu-emacs-bounces+geb-bug-gnu-emacs=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Original-Sender: bug-gnu-emacs-bounces+geb-bug-gnu-emacs=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Xref: news.gmane.org gmane.emacs.bugs:47760 Archived-At: > > That seems logical. But this report was marked as "notabug", but > > doesn't show how it got that mark. Anybody know what that means? > > It could mean that someone (I don't remember who has access) > changed it > straight in the database. This has happened to one of my bug reports > before. FWIW - I (the bug filer) received no mail about this bug's status. Nothing saying that it was classified as "notabug", or anything else for that matter.