On Fri, Sep 23, 2022 at 6:10 PM Lars Ingebrigtsen wrote: > Do you have a test case that demonstrates the problem? Yes, so what I initially wanted to do was parse dialyzer errors when running using the rebar3 package manager with `rebar3 dialyzer`. See attachment for example output. This is what I ended up with (setq compilation-error-regexp-alist (cons '("^\\(?:\n\\(.*\\)\n\\)?Line \\([0-9]+\\)\\(?: Column \\([0-9]+\\)\\)?: " 1 2 3 1) (cons ;; This next error regexp should not be necessary according to documentation. '("^Line \\([0-9]+\\)\\(?: Column \\([0-9]+\\)\\)?: " nil 1 2 1) (eval (car (get 'compilation-error-regexp-alist 'standard-value)))))) only with the 2nd error regexp does all errors get parsed. Though this is unexpected: In the 1st regexp when the first subexpression containing the file name does not match, the docs say it should act the same as the 2nd error regexp. When I have `eval-defun`:ed the patched version of `compilation-error-properties`, the 1st error regexp suffices as expected. > I think this change might be too large to apply without having an FSF > copyright assignment on file -- would you be willing to sign such > paperwork? The patch is mostly all indentation changes, but yes, if needed I would be willing though I would have to consult with my employer first.